Interdependent Human-Machine Teams: The Limits of Classical Team Science

We review the limits of classical team science from three perspectives, then the value of interdependence to a team and society. Afterwards, we include a review of our cur-rent research, our future research, and the generalizations that we have made in different contexts.

Authors

William F. Lawless (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-6923)

Institutions

Paine College (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Published: 2025-05-28
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v5i1.35564
Primary Topic: Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Interdependent Human-Machine Teams: The Limits of Classical Team Science

William F. Lawless

May 28, 2025

Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series

Complex Systems and Decision Making

article

Interdependent Human-Machine Teams: The Limits of Classical Team Science

William F. Lawless

May 28, 2025article en

Abstract

Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesVol. 5(1)

Paine College (US)

Openalex Percentile: Top 87%

Complex Systems and Decision Making

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interdependent Human-Machine Teams: The Limits of Classical Team Science — William F. Lawless · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS