In-hospital outcomes of sepsis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Insights from National Inpatient Sample.

e19077 Background: Per the Sepsis-3 guidelines published in 2016, sepsis was defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL) are at increased risks for developing sepsis. In this retrospective cohort study, we sought to identify the in-hospital outcomes of patients with DLBCL admitted for sepsis. Methods: Using the National inpatient sample (NIS) database from 2018-2021, we retrospectively analyzed patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of sepsis using the appropriate ICD10 code. Our primary population included patients ≥ 18 years admitted for sepsis. Patients were divided into 2 groups either having a DLBCL or not. Using a univariate and multivariate analysis, we compared the odds of various in hospital outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes considered were need for vasopressors, rate of mechanical ventilation (MV), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay (LOS) and total charges (TOTCHG). Results: There were 9,004,557 admissions for Sepsis out of which 33,400 (0.37%) had DLBCL. Compared to non DLBCL group, there was significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.48, CI: 1.38-1.59, p <0.001). Regarding secondary outcomes, there was increased odds of DIC (aOR: 1.81, CI: 1.48-2.1, p <0.001), need for vasopressor support (aOR: 1.45, CI: 1.32-1.59, p <0.001), LOS (+0.7 days, CI: 0.47-0.92, p <0.001) and additional TOTCHG (+ $17725.61 in additional costs, CI: $12855 - $22595, p <0.001). There was statistically no difference in AKI (aOR: 1.05, CI: 0.972-1.15, p-value 0.192) both groups however, DLBCL patients had significantly lower outcomes of requiring MV (aOR: 0.87, CI: 0.81-0.93, p <0.001) and needing RRT (aOR: 0.65, CI: 0.58-0.74, p <0.001) when compared to non DLBCL cohort. Conclusions: Patients with DLBCL have an overall increased risk of mortality when admitted for sepsis, with notably worse outcomes, increased length of stay and increased healthcare utilization costs. Further research may be needed to explain these outcomes in this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e19077
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-hospital outcomes of sepsis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Insights from National Inpatient Sample.

Alba Caceres Munoz, Augustina Annan, Victor Adenuga
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

In-hospital outcomes of sepsis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Insights from National Inpatient Sample.

Alba Caceres Munoz, Augustina Annan, Victor Adenuga
article en

Abstract

e19077 Background: Per the Sepsis-3 guidelines published in 2016, sepsis was defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL) are at increased risks for developing sepsis. In this retrospective cohort study, we sought to identify the in-hospital outcomes of patients with DLBCL admitted for sepsis. Methods: Using the National inpatient sample (NIS) database from 2018-2021, we retrospectively analyzed patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of sepsis using the appropriate ICD10 code. Our primary population included patients ≥ 18 years admitted for sepsis. Patients were divided into 2 groups either having a DLBCL or not. Using a univariate and multivariate analysis, we compared the odds of various in hospital outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes considered were need for vasopressors, rate of mechanical ventilation (MV), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay (LOS) and total charges (TOTCHG). Results: There were 9,004,557 admissions for Sepsis out of which 33,400 (0.37%) had DLBCL. Compared to non DLBCL group, there was significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.48, CI: 1.38-1.59, p <0.001). Regarding secondary outcomes, there was increased odds of DIC (aOR: 1.81, CI: 1.48-2.1, p <0.001), need for vasopressor support (aOR: 1.45, CI: 1.32-1.59, p <0.001), LOS (+0.7 days, CI: 0.47-0.92, p <0.001) and additional TOTCHG (+ $17725.61 in additional costs, CI: $12855 - $22595, p <0.001). There was statistically no difference in AKI (aOR: 1.05, CI: 0.972-1.15, p-value 0.192) both groups however, DLBCL patients had significantly lower outcomes of requiring MV (aOR: 0.87, CI: 0.81-0.93, p <0.001) and needing RRT (aOR: 0.65, CI: 0.58-0.74, p <0.001) when compared to non DLBCL cohort. Conclusions: Patients with DLBCL have an overall increased risk of mortality when admitted for sepsis, with notably worse outcomes, increased length of stay and increased healthcare utilization costs. Further research may be needed to explain these outcomes in this patient population.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Texas Health Resources Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.