Comparison of the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy and regorafenib combination therapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study.

e15529 Background: Regorafenib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) approved in third-line of treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of patients with mCRC who received regorafenib as a third-line of treatment from September 2020 to September 2024 at China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts, namely, the monotherapy (regorafenib alone), combination therapy (regorafenib combined with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or anti-PD-1). The clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), 1/2/3-year OS rates and safety data. Overall survival (OS) was not reach. Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled with a median age of 66 (52-81) years. 15 patients received regorafenib monotherapy and 13 patients received regorafenib combination therapy. There were 17 (60.7%) males and 11 (39.3%) females. Most patients had left-sided cancer (60.7%). Before regorafenib, 18 patients (64.3%) had received bevacizumab treatment. The majority of patients had not been on frontline treatment for more than 18 months (53.6%). The median PFS of was 5.2 months, (95% CI, 4.37-NA). One-year, 2-year and 3-year overall survival rate of was 42.86%, 28.57% and 10.71%, respectively. In the meanwhile, compared with monotherapy group, the 3-year overall survival rate in the combination therapy group is higher (6.67% vs. 15.38%).The incidence of all grade treatment-related adverse events was higher in combination therapy (69.23%) vs. monotherapy (20.00%) group; P = 0.036. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the combination therapy and monotherapy groups (23.08% vs. 0%); P = 0.130. Conclusions: Regorafenib alone or in combination with TAS-102 or anti-PD-1 is safe and feasible for third-line treatment of mCRC. Additional prospective large-scale studies are required to explore combination therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e15529
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy and regorafenib combination therapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study.

Meng Liu, Xiangling Su
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy and regorafenib combination therapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study.

Meng Liu, Xiangling Su
article en

Abstract

e15529 Background: Regorafenib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) approved in third-line of treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of patients with mCRC who received regorafenib as a third-line of treatment from September 2020 to September 2024 at China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Patients were grouped into 2 cohorts, namely, the monotherapy (regorafenib alone), combination therapy (regorafenib combined with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or anti-PD-1). The clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), 1/2/3-year OS rates and safety data. Overall survival (OS) was not reach. Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled with a median age of 66 (52-81) years. 15 patients received regorafenib monotherapy and 13 patients received regorafenib combination therapy. There were 17 (60.7%) males and 11 (39.3%) females. Most patients had left-sided cancer (60.7%). Before regorafenib, 18 patients (64.3%) had received bevacizumab treatment. The majority of patients had not been on frontline treatment for more than 18 months (53.6%). The median PFS of was 5.2 months, (95% CI, 4.37-NA). One-year, 2-year and 3-year overall survival rate of was 42.86%, 28.57% and 10.71%, respectively. In the meanwhile, compared with monotherapy group, the 3-year overall survival rate in the combination therapy group is higher (6.67% vs. 15.38%).The incidence of all grade treatment-related adverse events was higher in combination therapy (69.23%) vs. monotherapy (20.00%) group; P = 0.036. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the combination therapy and monotherapy groups (23.08% vs. 0%); P = 0.130. Conclusions: Regorafenib alone or in combination with TAS-102 or anti-PD-1 is safe and feasible for third-line treatment of mCRC. Additional prospective large-scale studies are required to explore combination therapy.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy and regorafenib combination therapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study. — Meng Liu, Xiangling Su · Journal of Clinical Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS