A ‘living intervention’: Evaluating a real-time feedback system to help teams co-create psychosocial safety climate

• Real-time monitoring provides new insight into how we measure Psychosocial Safety Climate. • Our app could be a cost-effective living intervention system for signalling psychosocial risk. • Climate is not a monolith; rather PSC is both stable and responsive to short-term fluctuations. • Managers have an opportunity for timely action on psychosocial safety signals. • Our evidence supports trending PSC theories such as PSC emergence and action potential. Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC) is a leading indicator of safety issues, and Real-time monitoring (RTM) interventions offer the opportunity to address safety concerns for worker psychological health before problems compound. We pilot a new intervention that combines RTM of PSC, enabling teams to engage in a co-creation process to develop ownership over their ‘living intervention’. We ran the PSC-RTM system in N = 3 healthcare teams in a large metropolitan government hospital in Australia. Pre-intervention PSC training was followed by 10 weeks of a 24/7 app kiosk that provided continual feedback to guide team discussion of psychosocial safety. Results demonstrated that the PSC-RTM system could capture clear safety signals, and our data provides evidence of a PSC emergence process. There was also support for a PSC action potential effect whereby improvement in PSC only occurred for teams that met a threshold for change. Findings show that PSC is fluid not monolithic; it’s dynamic and responsive to immediate changes in the safety environment, with real-time safety signals followed by ‘recovery’ phases to a set point indicating evidence for a “PSC Pulse”. The PSC-RTM poses a potentially cost-effective system for organisations to monitor psychosocial risk before hazards arise. Our findings also provide new evidence on trending topics such as PSC emergence, PSC set point, the nature of safety signals, forms of PSC enactment, and how real-time monitoring systems play a role in feedback-seeking and feedback-sharing behaviours to improve safety. Therefore, future studies might consider going beyond measuring a ‘snapshot’ of PSC, but rather monitor a team’s PSC Pulse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106901
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A ‘living intervention’: Evaluating a real-time feedback system to help teams co-create psychosocial safety climate

May Young Loh, Sarven S. McLinton, Ali Afsharian, Michelle M.R. Tuckey et al.
3 citations
Safety Science
Health Policy Implementation Science
8.45
article

A ‘living intervention’: Evaluating a real-time feedback system to help teams co-create psychosocial safety climate

May Young Loh, Sarven S. McLinton, Ali Afsharian, Michelle M.R. Tuckey, Maureen F. Dollard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Real-time monitoring provides new insight into how we measure Psychosocial Safety Climate. • Our app could be a cost-effective living intervention system for signalling psychosocial risk. • Climate is not a monolith; rather PSC is both stable and responsive to short-term fluctuations. • Managers have an opportunity for timely action on psychosocial safety signals. • Our evidence supports trending PSC theories such as PSC emergence and action potential. Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC) is a leading indicator of safety issues, and Real-time monitoring (RTM) interventions offer the opportunity to address safety concerns for worker psychological health before problems compound. We pilot a new intervention that combines RTM of PSC, enabling teams to engage in a co-creation process to develop ownership over their ‘living intervention’. We ran the PSC-RTM system in N = 3 healthcare teams in a large metropolitan government hospital in Australia. Pre-intervention PSC training was followed by 10 weeks of a 24/7 app kiosk that provided continual feedback to guide team discussion of psychosocial safety. Results demonstrated that the PSC-RTM system could capture clear safety signals, and our data provides evidence of a PSC emergence process. There was also support for a PSC action potential effect whereby improvement in PSC only occurred for teams that met a threshold for change. Findings show that PSC is fluid not monolithic; it’s dynamic and responsive to immediate changes in the safety environment, with real-time safety signals followed by ‘recovery’ phases to a set point indicating evidence for a “PSC Pulse”. The PSC-RTM poses a potentially cost-effective system for organisations to monitor psychosocial risk before hazards arise. Our findings also provide new evidence on trending topics such as PSC emergence, PSC set point, the nature of safety signals, forms of PSC enactment, and how real-time monitoring systems play a role in feedback-seeking and feedback-sharing behaviours to improve safety. Therefore, future studies might consider going beyond measuring a ‘snapshot’ of PSC, but rather monitor a team’s PSC Pulse.

Safety ScienceVol. 190
University of South Australia (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Health Policy Implementation Science
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.