Evaluating the role of consolidative chest radiotherapy after chemo-immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

8023 Background: Consolidative chest radiotherapy (XRT) after chemoimmunotherapy may provide benefits in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) due to the condition’s high sensitivity to radiation. Current guidelines suggest chest XRT for ES-SCLC patients who respond to chemotherapy, given its association with improved 2-year overall survival (OS), and reduced progression and recurrence rates. However, its role in the era of chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC remains unclear. Methods: Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for ES-SCLC patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2020 were analyzed (n=24,676). Cases included those treated with multi-agent chemotherapy, with data for T, N, and M status, and chest XRT. Exclusion criteria included survival <30 days, limited-stage SCLC cases, and missing key data elements. The primary outcome was OS from diagnosis, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was performed to compare outcomes in ES-SCLC patients receiving chest XRT after immunotherapy versus immunotherapy alone, adjusting for T, N, and M status, institution, sex, and CD score. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study stratified patients in two groups: 10,437 immunotherapy receivers and 14,239 not receiving immunotherapy. The proportion of chest XRT receivers was similar across both groups (13% vs. 14%, p=0.17). Receipt of XRT was significantly associated with younger age (<70), female sex, T3-4 stage, N2-N3, and M1a status; (p<0.05). Chest XRT was associated with a significant increase median OS in both groups: immunotherapy (13.1 months vs. 9.8 months; p<0.001) and non-immunotherapy (11.6 months vs. 8.4 months; p<0.001). XRT was an independent predictor of better OS in both groups after controlling for other covariates (HR 0.72 and 0.66; p<0.001). PSM analysis of 1,399 patients receiving XRT and 1,399 receiving immunotherapy alone confirmed the OS benefit of XRT after immunotherapy (13.1 months vs. 9.4 months; HR 0.63, p<0.001) with a 3-year survival of 16% (95%CI: 13.7-18.3%) vs 7% (95%CI: 5.3-8.7%), respectively. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that consolidative chest XRT is associated with improved overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC, especially when combined with chemoimmunotherapy. These findings are hypothesis-generating and support ongoing randomized studies evaluating consolidative radiotherapy in the chemoimmunotherapy era. Multivariable Cox regression analyses for overall survival in ES-SCLC. Factor Immunotherapy + Immunotherapy - HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) Chest XRT (Yes/No) 0.72 (0.68-0.77) 0.67 (0.64-0.71) p-value P<0.0001 P<0.0001 ES, extensive stage; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; CD, Charlson-Deyo; XRT, radiation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.8023
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the role of consolidative chest radiotherapy after chemo-immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

Takefumi Komiya, Joseph A. Miccio, Mitch Machtay, Jorge Raul Vazquez Urrutia et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Research Studies
article

Evaluating the role of consolidative chest radiotherapy after chemo-immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

Takefumi Komiya, Joseph A. Miccio, Mitch Machtay, Jorge Raul Vazquez Urrutia, Junjia Zhu, Natasha Venugopal
article en

Abstract

8023 Background: Consolidative chest radiotherapy (XRT) after chemoimmunotherapy may provide benefits in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) due to the condition’s high sensitivity to radiation. Current guidelines suggest chest XRT for ES-SCLC patients who respond to chemotherapy, given its association with improved 2-year overall survival (OS), and reduced progression and recurrence rates. However, its role in the era of chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC remains unclear. Methods: Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for ES-SCLC patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2020 were analyzed (n=24,676). Cases included those treated with multi-agent chemotherapy, with data for T, N, and M status, and chest XRT. Exclusion criteria included survival <30 days, limited-stage SCLC cases, and missing key data elements. The primary outcome was OS from diagnosis, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was performed to compare outcomes in ES-SCLC patients receiving chest XRT after immunotherapy versus immunotherapy alone, adjusting for T, N, and M status, institution, sex, and CD score. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study stratified patients in two groups: 10,437 immunotherapy receivers and 14,239 not receiving immunotherapy. The proportion of chest XRT receivers was similar across both groups (13% vs. 14%, p=0.17). Receipt of XRT was significantly associated with younger age (<70), female sex, T3-4 stage, N2-N3, and M1a status; (p<0.05). Chest XRT was associated with a significant increase median OS in both groups: immunotherapy (13.1 months vs. 9.8 months; p<0.001) and non-immunotherapy (11.6 months vs. 8.4 months; p<0.001). XRT was an independent predictor of better OS in both groups after controlling for other covariates (HR 0.72 and 0.66; p<0.001). PSM analysis of 1,399 patients receiving XRT and 1,399 receiving immunotherapy alone confirmed the OS benefit of XRT after immunotherapy (13.1 months vs. 9.4 months; HR 0.63, p<0.001) with a 3-year survival of 16% (95%CI: 13.7-18.3%) vs 7% (95%CI: 5.3-8.7%), respectively. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that consolidative chest XRT is associated with improved overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC, especially when combined with chemoimmunotherapy. These findings are hypothesis-generating and support ongoing randomized studies evaluating consolidative radiotherapy in the chemoimmunotherapy era. Multivariable Cox regression analyses for overall survival in ES-SCLC. Factor Immunotherapy + Immunotherapy - HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) Chest XRT (Yes/No) 0.72 (0.68-0.77) 0.67 (0.64-0.71) p-value P<0.0001 P<0.0001 ES, extensive stage; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; CD, Charlson-Deyo; XRT, radiation.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Lung Cancer Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.