Survival of patients with anal adenocarcinoma in comparison to rectal adenocarcinoma: A perspective from the United States National Cancer Database.

e15504 Background: Primary adenocarcinoma of the anal canal is a rare malignancy, accounting for only 5%-10% of all anal canal cancers. Due to its aggressive nature, the treatment approach for anal adenocarcinomas is often more intensive, typically involving surgery. This study aimed to compare the survival of anal vs. rectal adenocarcinoma using a large-scale national database. Methods: Patients with anal and rectal adenocarcinoma were identified from the NCDB database from 2005 to 2022. A 1:3 propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied to persons with anal carcinoma and patients with rectal adenocarcinoma to match sex, age, race, primary payor, income, education, Charlson comorbidities, facility type/location, diagnosis years, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM and overall staging, and treatment. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier (KM) model and log-rank tests. Results: There were 3853 persons diagnosed with anal adenocarcinoma and 196347 persons diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma. After PSM , anal adenocarcinoma (n=3477) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n=6779) patients had statistically significant differing overall mortality rates (48.43% vs 45.46%, p<0.01), medium OS (90.71 ± 1.74 vs 98.55 ± 1.24 months, p<0.01). The KM curves of the two groups showed a log-rank p=0.0003. Landmark survival rates of anal adenocarcinoma patients and rectal adenocarcinoma patients at 6 months [0.915 (95 CI 0.909-0.922) vs 0.919 (95 CI 0.909-0.28), p=0.63], 1 year [0.853 (95 CI 0.843-0.861) vs 0.856 (95 CI 0.844-0.868), p=0.78], 2 years [0.741 (95 CI 0.730-0.752) vs. 0.739 (95 CI 0.723-0.754), p=0.78], and 3 years [0.661 (95 CI 0.649-0.673) vs 0.645 (95 CI 0.627-0.662), p=0.27] were all comparable. In contrast, survival at 5 years [0.552 (95 CI 0.539-0.566) vs 0.509 (95 CI 0.490-0.528), p=0.01], and 10 years [0.390 (95 CI 0.374-0.406) vs 0.334 (95 CI 0.312-0.357), p<0.01] showed significant differences of better survival rates in those with anal adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in survival rate between persons with anal adenocarcinoma being higher than persons with rectal adenocarcinoma at 5 and 10 years. Overall mortality, mean survival time, and landmark survival rates between anal adenocarcinoma and rectal adenocarcinoma after 1:2 propensity-score matching. Anal adenocarcinoma(n =3477) rectal adenocarcinoma(n =6779) p-value Overall mortality (n, %) 1684 (48.43%) 3082 (45.46%) <0.01 Survival month (mean ± SE) 90.707 ± 1.74 98.549 ± 1.243 <0.01 Landmark survival rates (%, 95 CI) 6-month 0.919 (0.909-0.928) 0.915 (0.909-0.922) 0.63 1-year 0.856 (0.844-0.868) 0.853 (0.843-0.861) 0.78 2-year 0.739 (0.723-0.754) 0.741 (0.730-0.752) 0.88 3-year 0.645 (0.627-0.662) 0.661 (0.649-0.673) 0.27 5-year 0.509 (0.490-0.528) 0.552 (0.539-0.566) 0.01 10-year 0.334 (0.312-0.357) 0.390 (0.374-0.406) <0.01

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e15504
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival of patients with anal adenocarcinoma in comparison to rectal adenocarcinoma: A perspective from the United States National Cancer Database.

Aparna Nanduru, Marian Khalili, Matthew Ng, Renxi Li et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
article

Survival of patients with anal adenocarcinoma in comparison to rectal adenocarcinoma: A perspective from the United States National Cancer Database.

Aparna Nanduru, Marian Khalili, Matthew Ng, Renxi Li, Christina Schott
article en

Abstract

e15504 Background: Primary adenocarcinoma of the anal canal is a rare malignancy, accounting for only 5%-10% of all anal canal cancers. Due to its aggressive nature, the treatment approach for anal adenocarcinomas is often more intensive, typically involving surgery. This study aimed to compare the survival of anal vs. rectal adenocarcinoma using a large-scale national database. Methods: Patients with anal and rectal adenocarcinoma were identified from the NCDB database from 2005 to 2022. A 1:3 propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied to persons with anal carcinoma and patients with rectal adenocarcinoma to match sex, age, race, primary payor, income, education, Charlson comorbidities, facility type/location, diagnosis years, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM and overall staging, and treatment. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier (KM) model and log-rank tests. Results: There were 3853 persons diagnosed with anal adenocarcinoma and 196347 persons diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma. After PSM , anal adenocarcinoma (n=3477) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n=6779) patients had statistically significant differing overall mortality rates (48.43% vs 45.46%, p<0.01), medium OS (90.71 ± 1.74 vs 98.55 ± 1.24 months, p<0.01). The KM curves of the two groups showed a log-rank p=0.0003. Landmark survival rates of anal adenocarcinoma patients and rectal adenocarcinoma patients at 6 months [0.915 (95 CI 0.909-0.922) vs 0.919 (95 CI 0.909-0.28), p=0.63], 1 year [0.853 (95 CI 0.843-0.861) vs 0.856 (95 CI 0.844-0.868), p=0.78], 2 years [0.741 (95 CI 0.730-0.752) vs. 0.739 (95 CI 0.723-0.754), p=0.78], and 3 years [0.661 (95 CI 0.649-0.673) vs 0.645 (95 CI 0.627-0.662), p=0.27] were all comparable. In contrast, survival at 5 years [0.552 (95 CI 0.539-0.566) vs 0.509 (95 CI 0.490-0.528), p=0.01], and 10 years [0.390 (95 CI 0.374-0.406) vs 0.334 (95 CI 0.312-0.357), p<0.01] showed significant differences of better survival rates in those with anal adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in survival rate between persons with anal adenocarcinoma being higher than persons with rectal adenocarcinoma at 5 and 10 years. Overall mortality, mean survival time, and landmark survival rates between anal adenocarcinoma and rectal adenocarcinoma after 1:2 propensity-score matching. Anal adenocarcinoma(n =3477) rectal adenocarcinoma(n =6779) p-value Overall mortality (n, %) 1684 (48.43%) 3082 (45.46%) <0.01 Survival month (mean ± SE) 90.707 ± 1.74 98.549 ± 1.243 <0.01 Landmark survival rates (%, 95 CI) 6-month 0.919 (0.909-0.928) 0.915 (0.909-0.922) 0.63 1-year 0.856 (0.844-0.868) 0.853 (0.843-0.861) 0.78 2-year 0.739 (0.723-0.754) 0.741 (0.730-0.752) 0.88 3-year 0.645 (0.627-0.662) 0.661 (0.649-0.673) 0.27 5-year 0.509 (0.490-0.528) 0.552 (0.539-0.566) 0.01 10-year 0.334 (0.312-0.357) 0.390 (0.374-0.406) <0.01

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
George Washington University Hospital (US), George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.