Towards Determining How Deep Neural Models Learn to Reason

Large Language Models (LLMs) are well known to perform poorly on tasks involving reasoning, including deductive, inductive, abductive, and spatial reasoning. This is evidenced by many existing benchmarks. While techniques such as chain-of-thought prompting and inference computation attempt to improve reasoning performance, it is necessary to assess whether large models are ultimately "memorizing" answers to the questions being used to assess their purportedly learnt reasoning capabilities. In this short paper, we describe a work in progress that aims to investigate the innate reasoning processes of large models by generating new questions that require deductive reasoning to answer. Initially, we train from scratch and then assess the ability of a recurrent deep neural model to make such a binary decision. We then discuss how our preliminary results bear on the hypothesis that some deep neural models can indeed learn to reason in the absence of memorization and semantic shortcuts, and conclude by discussing future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v5i1.35614
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Determining How Deep Neural Models Learn to Reason

Atriya Sen, Anthony Marchiafava
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Towards Determining How Deep Neural Models Learn to Reason

Atriya Sen, Anthony Marchiafava
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are well known to perform poorly on tasks involving reasoning, including deductive, inductive, abductive, and spatial reasoning. This is evidenced by many existing benchmarks. While techniques such as chain-of-thought prompting and inference computation attempt to improve reasoning performance, it is necessary to assess whether large models are ultimately "memorizing" answers to the questions being used to assess their purportedly learnt reasoning capabilities. In this short paper, we describe a work in progress that aims to investigate the innate reasoning processes of large models by generating new questions that require deductive reasoning to answer. Initially, we train from scratch and then assess the ability of a recurrent deep neural model to make such a binary decision. We then discuss how our preliminary results bear on the hypothesis that some deep neural models can indeed learn to reason in the absence of memorization and semantic shortcuts, and conclude by discussing future work.

Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesVol. 5(1)
Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards Determining How Deep Neural Models Learn to Reason — Atriya Sen, Anthony Marchiafava · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS