Exploring the role of posthumous organ donation attitudes: A comparative study of Egyptian cancer patients and healthy individuals.

e22605 Background: Organ transplantation is a critical intervention for patients with end-stage organ failure, including those suffering from cancer-related organ damage. This study examines how chronic illness, specifically cancer, affects these attitudes by comparing cancer patients to healthy individuals and explores their awareness of relevant Egyptian laws. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two Egyptian governorates, involving 6,000 participants equally divided between cancer patients and healthy individuals. Data were collected through structured interviews and self-administered questionnaires, focusing on socio-demographic factors, knowledge of organ donation, and consent preferences. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of willingness to donate. Results: Cancer patients showed a significantly higher willingness to accept posthumous organ donation (91%) compared to healthy individuals (60%). Both groups favored written consent and incentivized donation options. Key predictors for healthy participants included age, job status, socioeconomic class, and awareness of donation laws, while these factors were less influential for cancer patients. Conclusions: The findings suggest that cancer increases openness to organ donation, regardless of socio-demographic factors. Tailored public awareness campaigns and flexible consent processes could enhance organ donation rates in Egypt. Health authorities should consider more formal consent processes for healthy individuals and simplified, surrogate-inclusive options for cancer patients. Comparison between chronically ill patients and healthy participants regarding personal preferences for consenting posthumous organ donation. Personal Preferences Patientsout of willing(n=2739) Healthy participantsout of willing(n=1815) COR (CI) P value by z test between proportions Written consent 1920 (70.1) 1365 (75.2) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) ** <0.001** Oral consent 819 (29.9) 450 (24.8) <0.001** Personal Preferences of consent with or without incentives With incentives 1632 (59.6) 993 (54.7) 1.2 (1.1-1.4) ** 0.001** Without incentives 1107 (40.4) 822 (45.3) 0.001** Personal Preference for Four Organ Donation Consenting Systems Informed consent by donor only 249 (9.1) 221 (12.2) <0.001** Informed consent by donor only or surrogate 277 (10.1) 105 (5.8) 0.4 (0.3-0.6) ** <0.001** Oral consent by donor only 249 (9.1) 91 (5.0) 0.4 (0.3-0.6) ** <0.001** Implementation of presumed consent 227 (8.3) 82 (4.5) 0.3 (0.3-0.5) ** <0.001** (a) Informed consent by donor only vs. Informed consent by donor only or surrogate (b) Informed consent by donor only vs. Oral consent by donor only (c) Informed consent by donor only vs. Implementation of presumed consent. **Highly significant: p <0.01.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e22605
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the role of posthumous organ donation attitudes: A comparative study of Egyptian cancer patients and healthy individuals.

Hanan A. Mohamed, Raefa Refaat Alam, Hanan Badran, Mohamed H. Abdel‐Rahman et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Exploring the role of posthumous organ donation attitudes: A comparative study of Egyptian cancer patients and healthy individuals.

Hanan A. Mohamed, Raefa Refaat Alam, Hanan Badran, Mohamed H. Abdel‐Rahman, Ammal M. Metwally, Abdelrahman Hassanein, Wafaa M. Elboraey, Ghada A. Elshaarawy, Safaa I. Abd El Hady, Hend I. Salama, Amira S. ElRifay, Zeinab M. El-Bouraey
article en

Abstract

e22605 Background: Organ transplantation is a critical intervention for patients with end-stage organ failure, including those suffering from cancer-related organ damage. This study examines how chronic illness, specifically cancer, affects these attitudes by comparing cancer patients to healthy individuals and explores their awareness of relevant Egyptian laws. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two Egyptian governorates, involving 6,000 participants equally divided between cancer patients and healthy individuals. Data were collected through structured interviews and self-administered questionnaires, focusing on socio-demographic factors, knowledge of organ donation, and consent preferences. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of willingness to donate. Results: Cancer patients showed a significantly higher willingness to accept posthumous organ donation (91%) compared to healthy individuals (60%). Both groups favored written consent and incentivized donation options. Key predictors for healthy participants included age, job status, socioeconomic class, and awareness of donation laws, while these factors were less influential for cancer patients. Conclusions: The findings suggest that cancer increases openness to organ donation, regardless of socio-demographic factors. Tailored public awareness campaigns and flexible consent processes could enhance organ donation rates in Egypt. Health authorities should consider more formal consent processes for healthy individuals and simplified, surrogate-inclusive options for cancer patients. Comparison between chronically ill patients and healthy participants regarding personal preferences for consenting posthumous organ donation. Personal Preferences Patientsout of willing(n=2739) Healthy participantsout of willing(n=1815) COR (CI) P value by z test between proportions Written consent 1920 (70.1) 1365 (75.2) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) ** <0.001** Oral consent 819 (29.9) 450 (24.8) <0.001** Personal Preferences of consent with or without incentives With incentives 1632 (59.6) 993 (54.7) 1.2 (1.1-1.4) ** 0.001** Without incentives 1107 (40.4) 822 (45.3) 0.001** Personal Preference for Four Organ Donation Consenting Systems Informed consent by donor only 249 (9.1) 221 (12.2) <0.001** Informed consent by donor only or surrogate 277 (10.1) 105 (5.8) 0.4 (0.3-0.6) ** <0.001** Oral consent by donor only 249 (9.1) 91 (5.0) 0.4 (0.3-0.6) ** <0.001** Implementation of presumed consent 227 (8.3) 82 (4.5) 0.3 (0.3-0.5) ** <0.001** (a) Informed consent by donor only vs. Informed consent by donor only or surrogate (b) Informed consent by donor only vs. Oral consent by donor only (c) Informed consent by donor only vs. Implementation of presumed consent. **Highly significant: p <0.01.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Mansoura University (EG), National Research Centre (EG), National Water Research Center (EG), Ministry of Health and Population (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.