Engineering the Reproducible Literature Review Section for Scholarly Publications and Grant Applications

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to transform the synthesis of scientific knowledge. While literature review sections generated with the assistance of LLMs raise legitimate concerns due to limitations of the technology, researchers' interest in automation brings a rare opportunity to change scientific practice to increase the robustness and reproducibility of literature review sections. This position paper proposes a digital object called a reproducible literature review section containing a discourse graph and a bibliography in a computable format. By leveraging technologies including query-focused summarization with retrieval-augmented generation, discourse graphs, and scholarly big data infrastructure, the reproducible literature review section could address trust issues with human-generated literature review sections and LLM-generated text.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v5i1.35612
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineering the Reproducible Literature Review Section for Scholarly Publications and Grant Applications

Jodi Schneider, Yuanxi Fu
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Library Science and Information Systems
article

Engineering the Reproducible Literature Review Section for Scholarly Publications and Grant Applications

Jodi Schneider, Yuanxi Fu
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to transform the synthesis of scientific knowledge. While literature review sections generated with the assistance of LLMs raise legitimate concerns due to limitations of the technology, researchers' interest in automation brings a rare opportunity to change scientific practice to increase the robustness and reproducibility of literature review sections. This position paper proposes a digital object called a reproducible literature review section containing a discourse graph and a bibliography in a computable format. By leveraging technologies including query-focused summarization with retrieval-augmented generation, discourse graphs, and scholarly big data infrastructure, the reproducible literature review section could address trust issues with human-generated literature review sections and LLM-generated text.

Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesVol. 5(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Library Science and Information Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Engineering the Reproducible Literature Review Section for Scholarly Publications and Grant Applications — Jodi Schneider, Yuanxi Fu · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS