Examining the impact of socioeconomic factors on survival and treatment outcomes in primary intraocular lymphoma: Insights from the SEER database (2000–2021).

e19080 Background: Primary Intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is a subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma, with increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. While it is known that health disparities exist across ocular oncology, there is limited research on the effect of socioeconomic factors on treatment in PIOL. The aim of this study is to investigate the importance of health equity in PIOL by evaluating the role of socioeconomic factors on survival and surgical treatment outcomes. Methods: Ocular lymphoma patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) were selected from 2000-2021. Covariates included age, gender, race, stage, tumor size, median household income, and population size of the patient’s home area. Cox regression analyses were completed to compare survival. Logistic regression compared factors associated with receipt of surgery. Results: A total of 3,756 patients were included. On Cox regression, there was improved survival for patients who were diagnosed with PIOL more recently (2016-2021) (p=0.013, HR=0.621), received radiation therapy (p<0.001, HR=0.582), and surgery (p=0.004, HR=0.621). Age over 65 (p<0.001, HR=4.919), diagnosis at distant staging (p<0.001, HR=2.404), and receiving chemotherapy (p<0.001, HR=1.804) were associated with worse survival. Logistic regression showed that patients who received chemotherapy (p=0.012, OR=0.775) and patients living in non-metropolitan areas (p=0.003, OR=0.622) were associated with a lower rate of surgery. Conclusions: This study assessed the impact of socioeconomic factors including age, race, household income, and living location on PIOL survival and treatment. Tumor stage and year of diagnosis were also analyzed. Diagnosis of PIOL from 2016-2021, receiving radiation therapy, and undergoing surgery had improved survival. Worse survival was associated with age over 65, distant staging, and those who received chemotherapy. Patients who received chemotherapy and lived in non-metropolitan areas had decreased rates of receiving surgical treatment. Evaluating barriers to care is important to determine how to improve survival and how to increase health equity across different patient populations. Future research should prioritize addressing obstacles to accessing care in order to improve outcomes for patients with PIOL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e19080
Primary Topic
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the impact of socioeconomic factors on survival and treatment outcomes in primary intraocular lymphoma: Insights from the SEER database (2000–2021).

Connor Tupper, Peter T. Silberstein, Laura Cogua, Erin C. Sinai
Journal of Clinical Oncology
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Examining the impact of socioeconomic factors on survival and treatment outcomes in primary intraocular lymphoma: Insights from the SEER database (2000–2021).

Connor Tupper, Peter T. Silberstein, Laura Cogua, Erin C. Sinai
article en

Abstract

e19080 Background: Primary Intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is a subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma, with increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. While it is known that health disparities exist across ocular oncology, there is limited research on the effect of socioeconomic factors on treatment in PIOL. The aim of this study is to investigate the importance of health equity in PIOL by evaluating the role of socioeconomic factors on survival and surgical treatment outcomes. Methods: Ocular lymphoma patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) were selected from 2000-2021. Covariates included age, gender, race, stage, tumor size, median household income, and population size of the patient’s home area. Cox regression analyses were completed to compare survival. Logistic regression compared factors associated with receipt of surgery. Results: A total of 3,756 patients were included. On Cox regression, there was improved survival for patients who were diagnosed with PIOL more recently (2016-2021) (p=0.013, HR=0.621), received radiation therapy (p<0.001, HR=0.582), and surgery (p=0.004, HR=0.621). Age over 65 (p<0.001, HR=4.919), diagnosis at distant staging (p<0.001, HR=2.404), and receiving chemotherapy (p<0.001, HR=1.804) were associated with worse survival. Logistic regression showed that patients who received chemotherapy (p=0.012, OR=0.775) and patients living in non-metropolitan areas (p=0.003, OR=0.622) were associated with a lower rate of surgery. Conclusions: This study assessed the impact of socioeconomic factors including age, race, household income, and living location on PIOL survival and treatment. Tumor stage and year of diagnosis were also analyzed. Diagnosis of PIOL from 2016-2021, receiving radiation therapy, and undergoing surgery had improved survival. Worse survival was associated with age over 65, distant staging, and those who received chemotherapy. Patients who received chemotherapy and lived in non-metropolitan areas had decreased rates of receiving surgical treatment. Evaluating barriers to care is important to determine how to improve survival and how to increase health equity across different patient populations. Future research should prioritize addressing obstacles to accessing care in order to improve outcomes for patients with PIOL.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Creighton University (US), Hofstra University (US), Phoenix (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.