Clinical outcomes in phase I trials across solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

e19014 Background: Low expectations of clinical benefit from Phase I cancer trials may hinder patient participation and delay study findings. Although progress in cancer drug development, shifting from cytotoxic agents to targeted therapies and immunotherapies, may have improved treatment responses, comprehensive data remain limited. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes for solid tumors and hematological malignancies from Phase I trials. Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, a total of 231 patients with advanced solid tumors and hematological malignancies were enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial at the Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Response rates for solid tumor patients were assessed using RECIST 1.1, while specific methods were used for hematological patients, of whom a large majority were lymphoma patients whose response was assessed according to the Lugano Classification. The response rate was defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete or partial response, while the clinical benefit rate was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease with no progression 90 days after C1D1. Results: A total of 231 patients were analyzed; comprising 56% (n=129) male and 44% (n=102) female, with a median age of 64 years. Solid tumors were present in 63.6% (n=147) patients, while 36.4% (n=84) had hematological malignancies. The response rate was 6.1% for solid tumors and 60.6% for hematological malignancies. The clinical benefit rate was 36.4% for solid tumors and 62.8% for hematological malignancies. The median progression free survival was 2.76 months (95% CI: 1.90–3.62) for solid tumors and 5.52 months (95% CI: 2.89–8.15) for hematological malignancies. The median survival was 8.21 months (95% CI: 6.75–9.68) for solid tumors and 21.42 months (95% CI: 9.15–33.69) for hematological malignancies. Conclusions: This study presents promising outcomes of Phase I cancer trials, with particularly encouraging response rates in hematological malignancies. While response rates in early-stage clinical trials vary by patient population and trial availability, this study reflects outcomes from a major academic center across diagnoses and clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e19014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes in phase I trials across solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Karl Ludwig Klingenberg, Laïla Belcaid, Kristoffer Staal Rohrberg, Caroline Hasselbalch Riley et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
article

Clinical outcomes in phase I trials across solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Karl Ludwig Klingenberg, Laïla Belcaid, Kristoffer Staal Rohrberg, Caroline Hasselbalch Riley, Iben Spanggaard, Martin Hutchings, Ulrik Lassen, Martin Hoejgaard, Laurine Bente Schram Harsløf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

e19014 Background: Low expectations of clinical benefit from Phase I cancer trials may hinder patient participation and delay study findings. Although progress in cancer drug development, shifting from cytotoxic agents to targeted therapies and immunotherapies, may have improved treatment responses, comprehensive data remain limited. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes for solid tumors and hematological malignancies from Phase I trials. Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, a total of 231 patients with advanced solid tumors and hematological malignancies were enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial at the Phase I Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Response rates for solid tumor patients were assessed using RECIST 1.1, while specific methods were used for hematological patients, of whom a large majority were lymphoma patients whose response was assessed according to the Lugano Classification. The response rate was defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete or partial response, while the clinical benefit rate was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease with no progression 90 days after C1D1. Results: A total of 231 patients were analyzed; comprising 56% (n=129) male and 44% (n=102) female, with a median age of 64 years. Solid tumors were present in 63.6% (n=147) patients, while 36.4% (n=84) had hematological malignancies. The response rate was 6.1% for solid tumors and 60.6% for hematological malignancies. The clinical benefit rate was 36.4% for solid tumors and 62.8% for hematological malignancies. The median progression free survival was 2.76 months (95% CI: 1.90–3.62) for solid tumors and 5.52 months (95% CI: 2.89–8.15) for hematological malignancies. The median survival was 8.21 months (95% CI: 6.75–9.68) for solid tumors and 21.42 months (95% CI: 9.15–33.69) for hematological malignancies. Conclusions: This study presents promising outcomes of Phase I cancer trials, with particularly encouraging response rates in hematological malignancies. While response rates in early-stage clinical trials vary by patient population and trial availability, this study reflects outcomes from a major academic center across diagnoses and clinical trials.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.