Alectinib as neoadjuvant treatment in potentially resectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC: Final analysis of ALNEO phase II trial (GOIRC-01-2020-ML42316).

8015 Background: Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and no single definitive therapeutic approach. The role of neoadjuvant alectinib in stage III ALK-positive NSCLC is still unclear. Here, we present the final analysis of the phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study aimed at investigating the activity and safety of alectinib in potentially resectable locally advanced stage III ALK-positive NSCLC patients (ALNEO trial, EUDRACT number 2020-003432-25). Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with potentially resectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC, ECOG PS≤1 were registered to receive neoadjuvant alectinib for 2 cycles (8 weeks) followed by surgery and adjuvant alectinib for 24 cycles (96 weeks). The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR) by BICR, objective response (OR), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). According to the Simon’s design (P0=20%, P1=40%), 18 and 33 patients were required for the first and second stage, respectively. Results: A total of 33 patients were registered in 20 Italian Oncology Centers from May 2021 to July 2024. Median age was 62 years (Interquartile Range [IQR], 49–74 years), 23 (70%) patients were female and 17 (52%) were never smokers. Clinical stage according to the 8th AJCC TNM was IIIA in 21 (64%) and IIIB in 12 (36%) patients. The most represented stage was T3N2 (n=8, 24%), followed by T1aN2 (n=4, 12%), T2aN2 (n=4, 12%), T4N0 (n=4, 12%) and T4N2 (n=4, 12%). All the patients completed the neoadjuvant phase and 28 (85%) underwent surgery, which consisted of lobectomy in 21 (64%), pneumonectomy in 3 (9%) and other surgery in 4 (12%) patients. Among patients who completed surgery, R0 was achieved in 24 (86%) patients. According to the BICR, MPR was documented in 15 (46%, 90% Confidence Interval [CI]: 31%–61%) patients and pCR in 4 (12%, 95% CI: 3%–28%) patients. Overall, an OR was observed in 22 (67%) patients. Adjuvant treatment was started in 26 (79%) patients with a median interval from surgery of 5.1 weeks (IQR, 3.6–6.0 weeks). After a median follow-up of 15.2 months (IQR, 6.8–27.8 months), 31 (94%) patients were alive and 5 (19%) patients completed the adjuvant treatment. Median EFS and OS were not reached. A total of 6 (18%) patients experienced disease progression/recurrence. Grade≥3 AEs occurred in 3 (9%) and 2 (8%) patients during neoadjuvant and adjuvant phase, respectively. Conclusions: ALNEO study met its primary endpoint, suggesting alectinib as a feasible peri-operative option in resectable locally advanced stage III ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The study was partially supported by Roche S.p.A. Clinical trial information: NCT05015010 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.8015
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alectinib as neoadjuvant treatment in potentially resectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC: Final analysis of ALNEO phase II trial (GOIRC-01-2020-ML42316).

Francesco Passiglia, Luca Toschi, Sara Pilotto, Francesca Mazzoni et al.
9 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
13.67
article

Alectinib as neoadjuvant treatment in potentially resectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC: Final analysis of ALNEO phase II trial (GOIRC-01-2020-ML42316).

Francesco Passiglia, Luca Toschi, Sara Pilotto, Francesca Mazzoni, Alessandra Bearz, Emilio Bria, Giulio Metro, Héctor Soto Parrà, Letizia Gnetti, Michele Tognetto, Diego Cortinovis, Angelo Delmonte, Serena Ricciardi, Alessandro Leonetti, Federica Bertolini, Marcello Tiseo, Luca Boni, Giulia Pasello, Fabiana Letizia Cecere, Francesco Gelsomino
article en
9 citations

Abstract

8015 Background: Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and no single definitive therapeutic approach. The role of neoadjuvant alectinib in stage III ALK-positive NSCLC is still unclear. Here, we present the final analysis of the phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study aimed at investigating the activity and safety of alectinib in potentially resectable locally advanced stage III ALK-positive NSCLC patients (ALNEO trial, EUDRACT number 2020-003432-25). Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with potentially resectable stage III ALK-positive NSCLC, ECOG PS≤1 were registered to receive neoadjuvant alectinib for 2 cycles (8 weeks) followed by surgery and adjuvant alectinib for 24 cycles (96 weeks). The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR) by BICR, objective response (OR), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). According to the Simon’s design (P0=20%, P1=40%), 18 and 33 patients were required for the first and second stage, respectively. Results: A total of 33 patients were registered in 20 Italian Oncology Centers from May 2021 to July 2024. Median age was 62 years (Interquartile Range [IQR], 49–74 years), 23 (70%) patients were female and 17 (52%) were never smokers. Clinical stage according to the 8th AJCC TNM was IIIA in 21 (64%) and IIIB in 12 (36%) patients. The most represented stage was T3N2 (n=8, 24%), followed by T1aN2 (n=4, 12%), T2aN2 (n=4, 12%), T4N0 (n=4, 12%) and T4N2 (n=4, 12%). All the patients completed the neoadjuvant phase and 28 (85%) underwent surgery, which consisted of lobectomy in 21 (64%), pneumonectomy in 3 (9%) and other surgery in 4 (12%) patients. Among patients who completed surgery, R0 was achieved in 24 (86%) patients. According to the BICR, MPR was documented in 15 (46%, 90% Confidence Interval [CI]: 31%–61%) patients and pCR in 4 (12%, 95% CI: 3%–28%) patients. Overall, an OR was observed in 22 (67%) patients. Adjuvant treatment was started in 26 (79%) patients with a median interval from surgery of 5.1 weeks (IQR, 3.6–6.0 weeks). After a median follow-up of 15.2 months (IQR, 6.8–27.8 months), 31 (94%) patients were alive and 5 (19%) patients completed the adjuvant treatment. Median EFS and OS were not reached. A total of 6 (18%) patients experienced disease progression/recurrence. Grade≥3 AEs occurred in 3 (9%) and 2 (8%) patients during neoadjuvant and adjuvant phase, respectively. Conclusions: ALNEO study met its primary endpoint, suggesting alectinib as a feasible peri-operative option in resectable locally advanced stage III ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The study was partially supported by Roche S.p.A. Clinical trial information: NCT05015010 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Verona (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Parma (IT), University of Perugia (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Italian Oncology Group of Clinical Research (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Carlo Forlanini Hospital (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - San Marco" (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), University of Turin (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
13.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.