Profiling treatment-associated evolutionary dynamics in advanced urothelial cancer via deep whole exome sequencing of cell-free DNA.

4572 Background: Monitoring treatment response and identifying resistance mechanisms remain critical challenges in managing advanced bladder cancer. We investigated whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and deep whole exome sequencing (D-WES) could provide insights into treatment response and resistance patterns. Methods: We prospectively collected blood samples from 70 patients with advanced bladder cancer during treatment. Ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) was performed on 213 plasma samples to quantify tumor fraction, with subsequent D-WES (200X) performed on 47 high-purity (i.e., at least 3% tumor fraction by ichorCNA) samples from 25 patients. Longitudinal analysis of ctDNA levels was correlated with clinical response. Phylogenetic reconstruction for samples in the D-WES cohort was used to identify candidate drivers of therapeutic response and resistance. Results: Changes in ctDNA tumor fraction correlated significantly with clinical trajectories: progression (median +1.3%), stable disease (-0.4%, p = 0.04 vs progression), and regression (-1.2%, p = 0.002 vs progression). Phylogenetic analysis revealed dynamic subclonal competition during treatment response. Mutation burden was significantly elevated in subclones associated with PD-(L)1 response (p = 0.04), including within a single patient. A number of novel candidate drivers of therapeutic response were identified across different therapeutic classes, with five genes meeting FDR-adjusted significance (q < 0.05): NLGN2, SHANK1 (chemotherapy resistance), GPR56 (taxane resistance), FOSL1, and ORC1L (chemotherapy sensitivity). Conclusions: Analysis of ctDNA can effectively monitor treatment response in advanced bladder cancer. D-WES of longitudinal samples revealed novel candidate drivers of therapeutic response and resistance, suggesting distinct molecular mechanisms may govern primary oncogenesis versus treatment response. These findings warrant further investigation in larger cohorts to validate their potential as predictive biomarkers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4572
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profiling treatment-associated evolutionary dynamics in advanced urothelial cancer via deep whole exome sequencing of cell-free DNA.

Gad A. Getz, Anwar Abdelnaser, Ilana Epstein, Timothy N. Clinton et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Profiling treatment-associated evolutionary dynamics in advanced urothelial cancer via deep whole exome sequencing of cell-free DNA.

Gad A. Getz, Anwar Abdelnaser, Ilana Epstein, Timothy N. Clinton, Charlene Mantia, Praful Ravi, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Brian P. Danysh, Kerry L. Kilbridge, Dory Freeman, Guru Sonpavde, Toni K. Choueiri, Arvind Ravi, Bradley A. McGregor, Mitra Shavakhi, Kent W. Mouw, Atish D. Choudhury, Joaquim Bellmunt, Mendy Miller, David J. Kwiatkowski
article en

Abstract

4572 Background: Monitoring treatment response and identifying resistance mechanisms remain critical challenges in managing advanced bladder cancer. We investigated whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and deep whole exome sequencing (D-WES) could provide insights into treatment response and resistance patterns. Methods: We prospectively collected blood samples from 70 patients with advanced bladder cancer during treatment. Ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) was performed on 213 plasma samples to quantify tumor fraction, with subsequent D-WES (200X) performed on 47 high-purity (i.e., at least 3% tumor fraction by ichorCNA) samples from 25 patients. Longitudinal analysis of ctDNA levels was correlated with clinical response. Phylogenetic reconstruction for samples in the D-WES cohort was used to identify candidate drivers of therapeutic response and resistance. Results: Changes in ctDNA tumor fraction correlated significantly with clinical trajectories: progression (median +1.3%), stable disease (-0.4%, p = 0.04 vs progression), and regression (-1.2%, p = 0.002 vs progression). Phylogenetic analysis revealed dynamic subclonal competition during treatment response. Mutation burden was significantly elevated in subclones associated with PD-(L)1 response (p = 0.04), including within a single patient. A number of novel candidate drivers of therapeutic response were identified across different therapeutic classes, with five genes meeting FDR-adjusted significance (q < 0.05): NLGN2, SHANK1 (chemotherapy resistance), GPR56 (taxane resistance), FOSL1, and ORC1L (chemotherapy sensitivity). Conclusions: Analysis of ctDNA can effectively monitor treatment response in advanced bladder cancer. D-WES of longitudinal samples revealed novel candidate drivers of therapeutic response and resistance, suggesting distinct molecular mechanisms may govern primary oncogenesis versus treatment response. These findings warrant further investigation in larger cohorts to validate their potential as predictive biomarkers.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Broad Institute (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Florida Hospital Cancer Institute (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.