Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who received perioperative durvalumab (D) in NIAGARA.

4503 Background: In the phase 3 NIAGARA trial (NCT03732677) of patients (pts) with cisplatin-eligible MIBC, addition of perioperative D to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival compared with NAC alone, and a 10% higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate, with a manageable safety profile and no impact on the feasibility of surgery. Here, we report a planned exploratory analysis of ctDNA and association with clinical outcomes from NIAGARA. Methods: NIAGARA enrolled cisplatin-eligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4aN0/1M0) planned for radical cystectomy (RC). Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive either neoadjuvant D (1500 mg IV Q3W) and NAC (cisplatin + gemcitabine IV Q3W) for 4 cycles followed by RC, then adjuvant D monotherapy (1500 mg IV Q4W) for 8 cycles (D arm), or NAC followed by RC alone (comparator [C] arm). Dual primary endpoints were pCR and EFS. Disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary endpoint. Plasma ctDNA was assessed using the Signatera personalized, tumor-informed molecular residual disease (MRD) assay (Natera, Inc, Austin, TX, USA). ctDNA was assessed at baseline (screening or neoadjuvant C1D1, n = 460), after neoadjuvant treatment prior to RC (pre-RC, n = 422), and at C1D1 of the adjuvant phase (post-RC, n = 345). Results: Of 1063 randomized pts, 462 comprised the biomarker-evaluable population (237 D arm; 225 C arm). Patient characteristics were similar to the ITT population. Overall, the ctDNA+ rate at baseline was 57% (260/460) and decreased to 22% (94/422) after neoadjuvant treatment at pre-RC. ctDNA clearance rates from baseline to pre-RC were 41% in the D arm and 31% in the C arm. The non-pCR rate was 97% (86/89) among pts with pre-RC ctDNA+ status. Overall ctDNA+ rate post-RC was 9% (31/345). EFS benefit in the D arm vs the C arm was observed in both the baseline ctDNA+ and ctDNA− groups (Table). DFS benefit with perioperative D was observed in post-RC ctDNA+ and ctDNA− groups (Table). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, ctDNA+ status at pre-RC was associated with non-pCR. Higher ctDNA clearance from baseline to pre-RC in the D arm indicated the additional benefit of D plus NAC vs NAC alone. Perioperative D provided an EFS benefit to both pts with ctDNA+ and ctDNA− status at baseline; a similar trend was observed with DFS based on ctDNA status post-RC. These results further support the perioperative D regimen for pts with MIBC. Funding : AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT03732677 . EFS DFS Baseline ctDNA+ Baseline ctDNA- Post-RC ctDNA+ Post-RC ctDNA- D C D C D C D C n 137 123 99 101 9 8 129 126 Median (95% CI), months NR (NR–NR) 32.3(24.3–NR) NR(NR–NR) NR(NR–NR) 9.5(2.8–NR) 6.2(2.9–NR) NR(NR–NR) NR(NR–NR) Hazard ratio(95% CI) 0.73(0.51–1.06) 0.45(0.25–0.84) NC* 0.49(0.28–0.84) CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculable; NR, not reached. *NC due to <20 events between arms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4503
Citations
26
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who received perioperative durvalumab (D) in NIAGARA.

Hiroaki Kikukawa, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Svetlana Ho, Joshua J. Meeks et al.
26 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
24.34
article

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who received perioperative durvalumab (D) in NIAGARA.

Hiroaki Kikukawa, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Svetlana Ho, Joshua J. Meeks, Matthew D. Galsky, Hikmat A Al‐Ahmadie, James W.F. Catto, Amir Mortazavi, Yashaswi Shrestha, Vagif Atduev, Yousef Zakharia, Wenjing Xin, Toan Quang Vu, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Thomas Powles, Bernhard J. Eigl, Ying Wang, Tae‐Hwan Kim, Kazuo Nishimura, Michiel Simon Van Der Heijden
article en
26 citations

Abstract

4503 Background: In the phase 3 NIAGARA trial (NCT03732677) of patients (pts) with cisplatin-eligible MIBC, addition of perioperative D to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival compared with NAC alone, and a 10% higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate, with a manageable safety profile and no impact on the feasibility of surgery. Here, we report a planned exploratory analysis of ctDNA and association with clinical outcomes from NIAGARA. Methods: NIAGARA enrolled cisplatin-eligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4aN0/1M0) planned for radical cystectomy (RC). Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive either neoadjuvant D (1500 mg IV Q3W) and NAC (cisplatin + gemcitabine IV Q3W) for 4 cycles followed by RC, then adjuvant D monotherapy (1500 mg IV Q4W) for 8 cycles (D arm), or NAC followed by RC alone (comparator [C] arm). Dual primary endpoints were pCR and EFS. Disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary endpoint. Plasma ctDNA was assessed using the Signatera personalized, tumor-informed molecular residual disease (MRD) assay (Natera, Inc, Austin, TX, USA). ctDNA was assessed at baseline (screening or neoadjuvant C1D1, n = 460), after neoadjuvant treatment prior to RC (pre-RC, n = 422), and at C1D1 of the adjuvant phase (post-RC, n = 345). Results: Of 1063 randomized pts, 462 comprised the biomarker-evaluable population (237 D arm; 225 C arm). Patient characteristics were similar to the ITT population. Overall, the ctDNA+ rate at baseline was 57% (260/460) and decreased to 22% (94/422) after neoadjuvant treatment at pre-RC. ctDNA clearance rates from baseline to pre-RC were 41% in the D arm and 31% in the C arm. The non-pCR rate was 97% (86/89) among pts with pre-RC ctDNA+ status. Overall ctDNA+ rate post-RC was 9% (31/345). EFS benefit in the D arm vs the C arm was observed in both the baseline ctDNA+ and ctDNA− groups (Table). DFS benefit with perioperative D was observed in post-RC ctDNA+ and ctDNA− groups (Table). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, ctDNA+ status at pre-RC was associated with non-pCR. Higher ctDNA clearance from baseline to pre-RC in the D arm indicated the additional benefit of D plus NAC vs NAC alone. Perioperative D provided an EFS benefit to both pts with ctDNA+ and ctDNA− status at baseline; a similar trend was observed with DFS based on ctDNA status post-RC. These results further support the perioperative D regimen for pts with MIBC. Funding : AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT03732677 . EFS DFS Baseline ctDNA+ Baseline ctDNA- Post-RC ctDNA+ Post-RC ctDNA- D C D C D C D C n 137 123 99 101 9 8 129 126 Median (95% CI), months NR (NR–NR) 32.3(24.3–NR) NR(NR–NR) NR(NR–NR) 9.5(2.8–NR) 6.2(2.9–NR) NR(NR–NR) NR(NR–NR) Hazard ratio(95% CI) 0.73(0.51–1.06) 0.45(0.25–0.84) NC* 0.49(0.28–0.84) CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculable; NR, not reached. *NC due to <20 events between arms.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Northwestern University (US), University of Iowa (US), BC Cancer Agency (CA), St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Tsukuba (JP), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Dutch Cancer Society (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Kyungpook National University (KR), AstraZeneca (Japan) (JP), Vietnam National Children's Hospital (VN), AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE), AstraZeneca (Spain) (ES), AstraZeneca (United States) (US), Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), Kumamoto Medical Center (JP), University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Florence (IT), Federal Medical-Biological Agency (RU), University of Sheffield (GB), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
24.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.