The unseen burden of CTCL caregiving.

e19059 Background: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) patients rely heavily on informal caregivers for complex psychosocial and medical support. While crucial for patient outcomes, these caregivers face unique psychological challenges balancing care responsibilities with their own emotional needs. This study explores how CTCL caregivers navigate the expectations of caregiving while managing their own psychological well-being. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews using an internally standardized questionnaire with (N=16) CTCL patients and caregivers at a comprehensive cancer center. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through thematic analysis using MAXQDA software to identify recurring patterns in caregiving experiences, with particular attention to caregivers' emotional experiences and their interactions with healthcare systems. The study was approved by the Emory University institutional review board (IRB #00008367). Results: Analysis of caregiver interviews revealed a pattern of progressive psychological isolation driven by both internal and institutional factors. Caregivers described three interconnected forms of silencing: (1) Suppressed depression - caregivers consistently prioritized projecting strength over acknowledging their own emotional needs; (2) Systemic Invisibility - caregivers reported feeling overlooked within healthcare settings despite their consistent presence and integral role in patient care; (3) Protective isolation - caregivers deliberately withdrew from support systems and minimized their own struggles to maintain an optimistic environment for their loved ones, ultimately creating a cycle of increasing isolation and emotional burden. Conclusions: This study reveals a complex dynamic where caregivers' dedication to creating a supportive environment for CTCL patients often comes at the cost of their own psychological well-being. Healthcare institutions should consider developing supportive resources that respect both patient privacy and caregiver needs through: 1) Creating accessible educational materials and resource directories for caregiver self-care and support services; 2) Establishing voluntary caregiver support groups within cancer care settings; and 3) Building partnerships with community mental health organizations that specialize in supporting caregivers. While these findings came from the CTCL setting, they may represent universal challenges faced by caregivers across oncology, suggesting broad applicability for developing feasible and privacy-compliant caregiver support programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e19059
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The unseen burden of CTCL caregiving.

Pamela B. Allen, Darina Paulino, Margie D. Dixon, Joel Andrews et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

The unseen burden of CTCL caregiving.

Pamela B. Allen, Darina Paulino, Margie D. Dixon, Joel Andrews, Rebecca D. Pentz, Zachary J. Wolner, Mary Jo Lechowicz, Brittany Adams, Tatenda Merken, Angela Ballard Oden, Kenya I. Apongule, Charles E. Waldner
article en

Abstract

e19059 Background: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) patients rely heavily on informal caregivers for complex psychosocial and medical support. While crucial for patient outcomes, these caregivers face unique psychological challenges balancing care responsibilities with their own emotional needs. This study explores how CTCL caregivers navigate the expectations of caregiving while managing their own psychological well-being. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews using an internally standardized questionnaire with (N=16) CTCL patients and caregivers at a comprehensive cancer center. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through thematic analysis using MAXQDA software to identify recurring patterns in caregiving experiences, with particular attention to caregivers' emotional experiences and their interactions with healthcare systems. The study was approved by the Emory University institutional review board (IRB #00008367). Results: Analysis of caregiver interviews revealed a pattern of progressive psychological isolation driven by both internal and institutional factors. Caregivers described three interconnected forms of silencing: (1) Suppressed depression - caregivers consistently prioritized projecting strength over acknowledging their own emotional needs; (2) Systemic Invisibility - caregivers reported feeling overlooked within healthcare settings despite their consistent presence and integral role in patient care; (3) Protective isolation - caregivers deliberately withdrew from support systems and minimized their own struggles to maintain an optimistic environment for their loved ones, ultimately creating a cycle of increasing isolation and emotional burden. Conclusions: This study reveals a complex dynamic where caregivers' dedication to creating a supportive environment for CTCL patients often comes at the cost of their own psychological well-being. Healthcare institutions should consider developing supportive resources that respect both patient privacy and caregiver needs through: 1) Creating accessible educational materials and resource directories for caregiver self-care and support services; 2) Establishing voluntary caregiver support groups within cancer care settings; and 3) Building partnerships with community mental health organizations that specialize in supporting caregivers. While these findings came from the CTCL setting, they may represent universal challenges faced by caregivers across oncology, suggesting broad applicability for developing feasible and privacy-compliant caregiver support programs.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Emory Healthcare (US), Hofstra University (US), Emory University (US), Piedmont Cancer Institute (US), Winship Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.