Real-world comparative outcomes of chemo-immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in colon cancer: A multi-center retrospective cohort study.

e15579 Background: Immunotherapy and chemotherapy are key treatments for metastatic colon cancer, but their comparative effects on survival and adverse events remain unclear, warranting further investigation. Methods: This retrospective study used the TriNetX database (January 2017–December 2022) to evaluate patients with stage II-IV colon cancer. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors with Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and Atezolizumab (chemo-immunotherapy), and those treated with chemotherapy alone (5-FU or capecitabine). Propensity score matching ensured balanced cohorts. Results: After matching, each cohort was reduced to 171 patients, achieving balance in demographics such as age (mean 64.9 ± 14.1 vs. 66 ± 13.5 years), sex (51.46% male vs. 49.70% male), ethnicity (59.06% vs. 55.56% non-Hispanic), and White race (63.74% vs. 67.25%). The median follow-up was shorter in the chemo-immunotherapy group (498 days; IQR: 944 days) compared to the chemotherapy group (772 days; IQR: 734 days). Median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in the chemo-immunotherapy group (648 days) compared to the chemotherapy group, with survival probabilities at the end of the time window of 40.75% and 58.94%, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for survival was 1.883 (95% CI: 1.356–2.616, p = 0.0001), indicating a significantly higher risk of mortality in the chemo-immunotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy group. The risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) was similar between the chemo-immunotherapy and chemotherapy groups (HR: 0.889, 95% CI: 0.608–1.299, p = 0.9209). The risk of Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) was comparable between the groups (HR: 1.298, 95% CI: 0.843–1.998, p = 0.8126). The risk of liver metastases was higher in the chemo-immunotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy group (HR: 1.548, 95% CI: 1.127–2.126, p = 0.2519). The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was similar between the two groups (HR: 1.537, 95% CI: 0.727–3.253, p = 0.7349). Conclusions: Chemo-immunotherapy in metastatic colon cancer showed a shorter overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone, with no significant differences in MACE, MAKE, liver metastases, or GI bleeding risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e15579
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world comparative outcomes of chemo-immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in colon cancer: A multi-center retrospective cohort study.

Omar Hamadi, Ameer Awashra, Mahdi El Ankouni, Islam Rajab et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Real-world comparative outcomes of chemo-immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in colon cancer: A multi-center retrospective cohort study.

Omar Hamadi, Ameer Awashra, Mahdi El Ankouni, Islam Rajab, M. Elgendy, Abdallah Hussein
article en

Abstract

e15579 Background: Immunotherapy and chemotherapy are key treatments for metastatic colon cancer, but their comparative effects on survival and adverse events remain unclear, warranting further investigation. Methods: This retrospective study used the TriNetX database (January 2017–December 2022) to evaluate patients with stage II-IV colon cancer. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors with Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and Atezolizumab (chemo-immunotherapy), and those treated with chemotherapy alone (5-FU or capecitabine). Propensity score matching ensured balanced cohorts. Results: After matching, each cohort was reduced to 171 patients, achieving balance in demographics such as age (mean 64.9 ± 14.1 vs. 66 ± 13.5 years), sex (51.46% male vs. 49.70% male), ethnicity (59.06% vs. 55.56% non-Hispanic), and White race (63.74% vs. 67.25%). The median follow-up was shorter in the chemo-immunotherapy group (498 days; IQR: 944 days) compared to the chemotherapy group (772 days; IQR: 734 days). Median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in the chemo-immunotherapy group (648 days) compared to the chemotherapy group, with survival probabilities at the end of the time window of 40.75% and 58.94%, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for survival was 1.883 (95% CI: 1.356–2.616, p = 0.0001), indicating a significantly higher risk of mortality in the chemo-immunotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy group. The risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) was similar between the chemo-immunotherapy and chemotherapy groups (HR: 0.889, 95% CI: 0.608–1.299, p = 0.9209). The risk of Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) was comparable between the groups (HR: 1.298, 95% CI: 0.843–1.998, p = 0.8126). The risk of liver metastases was higher in the chemo-immunotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy group (HR: 1.548, 95% CI: 1.127–2.126, p = 0.2519). The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was similar between the two groups (HR: 1.537, 95% CI: 0.727–3.253, p = 0.7349). Conclusions: Chemo-immunotherapy in metastatic colon cancer showed a shorter overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone, with no significant differences in MACE, MAKE, liver metastases, or GI bleeding risks.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
An-Najah National University (PS), Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center (US), Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US), St. Joseph’s University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.