Real-life comparison between immunotherapy and conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced anal cancer after first-line treatment.

e15501 Background: Phase II study have suggested potential benefits of immunotherapy for selected populations based on specific biomarkers in first line therapy. However, there is a clear lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in subsequent lines of treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of immunotherapy treatment in subsequent lines of therapy for patients with metastatic anal cancer. Methods: Investigators conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study involving patients who experienced disease progression after first-line treatment for anal cancer. The study was carried out mainly at the AC Camargo Cancer Center in São Paulo, Brazil, with data collected from January/2007 to June/2024, focusing on patients in subsequent lines of treatment who received either immunotherapy or the phisicyan’s choice chemotherapy. The primary outcomes assessed were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS). It was considered p value < 0,05 statistically significant. Results: A total of 35 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 24 (68.3%) received chemotherapy as their second-line treatment, while 11 (31.4%) were treated with immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab or Atezolizumab). Of these, six patients (17.1%) were HIV-positive, and 21 (60%) were classified as elderly (over 65 years). Treatment regimens included platinum-based combinations with fluoropyrimidine in 12 patients (34.3%) and taxanes in other 12 patients (34.3%). Median follow-up was 63,5 months (95% CI 54,9 – 72,2). The median overall survival in the immunotherapy group was 30 months (95% CI 12.0 – 47.9), versus 8 months (95% CI 5.2 – 10.7) in the chemotherapy with p value of 0,027. The median progression-free survival for patients receiving second-line treatment was 6.0 months (95% CI 1.6 – 10.3) in the immunotherapy group versus 4.0 months (95% CI 2.1 – 5.8) in the conventional chemotherapy cohort with p value of 0,102. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that immunotherapy significantly improves overall survival in patients with advanced squamous-cell anal cancer who had received one previous line of chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e15501
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-life comparison between immunotherapy and conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced anal cancer after first-line treatment.

Marcos Pedro Guedes Camandaroba, Pedro Luiz Serrano Usón, Rachel P. Riechelmann, Bernard Marquès et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
article

Real-life comparison between immunotherapy and conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced anal cancer after first-line treatment.

Marcos Pedro Guedes Camandaroba, Pedro Luiz Serrano Usón, Rachel P. Riechelmann, Bernard Marquès, Matheus Coimbra Barroso
article en

Abstract

e15501 Background: Phase II study have suggested potential benefits of immunotherapy for selected populations based on specific biomarkers in first line therapy. However, there is a clear lack of evidence regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in subsequent lines of treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of immunotherapy treatment in subsequent lines of therapy for patients with metastatic anal cancer. Methods: Investigators conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study involving patients who experienced disease progression after first-line treatment for anal cancer. The study was carried out mainly at the AC Camargo Cancer Center in São Paulo, Brazil, with data collected from January/2007 to June/2024, focusing on patients in subsequent lines of treatment who received either immunotherapy or the phisicyan’s choice chemotherapy. The primary outcomes assessed were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS). It was considered p value < 0,05 statistically significant. Results: A total of 35 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 24 (68.3%) received chemotherapy as their second-line treatment, while 11 (31.4%) were treated with immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab or Atezolizumab). Of these, six patients (17.1%) were HIV-positive, and 21 (60%) were classified as elderly (over 65 years). Treatment regimens included platinum-based combinations with fluoropyrimidine in 12 patients (34.3%) and taxanes in other 12 patients (34.3%). Median follow-up was 63,5 months (95% CI 54,9 – 72,2). The median overall survival in the immunotherapy group was 30 months (95% CI 12.0 – 47.9), versus 8 months (95% CI 5.2 – 10.7) in the chemotherapy with p value of 0,027. The median progression-free survival for patients receiving second-line treatment was 6.0 months (95% CI 1.6 – 10.3) in the immunotherapy group versus 4.0 months (95% CI 2.1 – 5.8) in the conventional chemotherapy cohort with p value of 0,102. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that immunotherapy significantly improves overall survival in patients with advanced squamous-cell anal cancer who had received one previous line of chemotherapy.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), AC Camargo Hospital (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.