Five-year follow-up results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study of adjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) for the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

4514 Background: KEYNOTE-564 (NCT03142334) established pembro monotherapy as the first adjuvant regimen to significantly improve both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) vs placebo (pbo) after surgery for participants (pts) with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence. We present results from the fourth prespecified interim analysis with a minimum follow-up of 5 yrs. Methods: KEYNOTE-564 is a randomized, double-blind, pbo-controlled, phase 3 study, which enrolled adults with ccRCC with intermediate-high (pT2 Gr 4 or sarcomatoid, or pT3 any Gr, N0 M0) or high (pT4 any Gr, N0 M0, or any pT and Gr, N+ M0) risk of recurrence or M1 with no evidence of disease (NED) who had nephrectomy and/or metastasectomy ≤12 wks prior to 1:1 randomization to pembro 200 mg or pbo IV Q3W. Treatment continued for ~1 yr (17 cycles) or until recurrence, intolerable AEs, or physician decision to discontinue treatment. The primary endpoint was DFS by investigator; the key secondary endpoint was OS. The study met its DFS and OS objectives at earlier analyses; thus, no subsequent formal statistical testing occurred. AEs were collected for 30-90 days after treatment cessation depending on severity, with serious treatment-related AEs collected regardless of timing. Results: A total of 994 pts were randomized to pembro (n = 496) or pbo (n = 498). The median follow-up time to data cutoff date of 25 Sept 2024 was 69.5 mo (range, 60.2−86.9). All pts completed or discontinued study treatment ≥3 years earlier. 188 DFS events in the pembro group and 241 in the pbo group had occurred. Median DFS was not reached (NR) vs 68.3 mo, respectively (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59−0.86); estimated DFS rate at 5 yrs was 60.9% vs 52.2%. 68 OS events in the pembro group and 99 in the pbo group had occurred. Median OS was NR in both arms (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48−0.90); estimated OS rate at 5 yrs was 87.7% vs 82.3%, respectively. DFS and OS outcomes were consistent across key subgroups, including by prespecified risk and sarcomatoid features (Table). No new serious treatment-related AEs have been reported for ≥3 years. Conclusions: With ≥5 yrs of follow-up, the benefits observed with adjuvant pembro vs pbo are consistent with prior analyses, including in all subgroups. No new serious treatment-related safety signals occurred. Adjuvant pembro remains a standard-of-care option for patients with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT03142334 . All pts Prespecified risk subgroups Sarcomatoid features Intermediate-high High M1 NED Present Absent N 994 855 77 57 111 829 DFS events 429 342 49 37 59 339 DFS HR(95% CI) 0.71(0.59−0.86) 0.75 (0.61−0.93) 0.61(0.35−1.08) 0.48(0.25−0.92) 0.56(0.33−0.96) 0.75(0.60−0.92) OS events 167 131 22 13 23 130 OS HR(95% CI) 0.66(0.48−0.90) 0.65(0.46−0.92) 0.86(0.37−1.98) 0.36(0.11−1.18) 0.67(0.29−1.56) 0.64(0.45−0.91)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4514
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five-year follow-up results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study of adjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) for the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

John M. Burke, Marine Gross‐Goupil, Howard Gurney, Naomi B. Haas et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
4.56
article

Five-year follow-up results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study of adjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) for the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

John M. Burke, Marine Gross‐Goupil, Howard Gurney, Naomi B. Haas, Joseph E. Burgents, Toni K. Choueiri, Stefan Nicholas Symeonides, Gury K. Doshi, Piotr Sawrycki, Se Hoon Park, Jerry Cornell, Jae‐Lyun Lee, Naveed Sarwar, Rodolfo F. Perini, Warren Chang, Piotr Tomczak, Thomas B. Powles, Balaji Venugopal, Tom Ferguson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

4514 Background: KEYNOTE-564 (NCT03142334) established pembro monotherapy as the first adjuvant regimen to significantly improve both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) vs placebo (pbo) after surgery for participants (pts) with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence. We present results from the fourth prespecified interim analysis with a minimum follow-up of 5 yrs. Methods: KEYNOTE-564 is a randomized, double-blind, pbo-controlled, phase 3 study, which enrolled adults with ccRCC with intermediate-high (pT2 Gr 4 or sarcomatoid, or pT3 any Gr, N0 M0) or high (pT4 any Gr, N0 M0, or any pT and Gr, N+ M0) risk of recurrence or M1 with no evidence of disease (NED) who had nephrectomy and/or metastasectomy ≤12 wks prior to 1:1 randomization to pembro 200 mg or pbo IV Q3W. Treatment continued for ~1 yr (17 cycles) or until recurrence, intolerable AEs, or physician decision to discontinue treatment. The primary endpoint was DFS by investigator; the key secondary endpoint was OS. The study met its DFS and OS objectives at earlier analyses; thus, no subsequent formal statistical testing occurred. AEs were collected for 30-90 days after treatment cessation depending on severity, with serious treatment-related AEs collected regardless of timing. Results: A total of 994 pts were randomized to pembro (n = 496) or pbo (n = 498). The median follow-up time to data cutoff date of 25 Sept 2024 was 69.5 mo (range, 60.2−86.9). All pts completed or discontinued study treatment ≥3 years earlier. 188 DFS events in the pembro group and 241 in the pbo group had occurred. Median DFS was not reached (NR) vs 68.3 mo, respectively (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59−0.86); estimated DFS rate at 5 yrs was 60.9% vs 52.2%. 68 OS events in the pembro group and 99 in the pbo group had occurred. Median OS was NR in both arms (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48−0.90); estimated OS rate at 5 yrs was 87.7% vs 82.3%, respectively. DFS and OS outcomes were consistent across key subgroups, including by prespecified risk and sarcomatoid features (Table). No new serious treatment-related AEs have been reported for ≥3 years. Conclusions: With ≥5 yrs of follow-up, the benefits observed with adjuvant pembro vs pbo are consistent with prior analyses, including in all subgroups. No new serious treatment-related safety signals occurred. Adjuvant pembro remains a standard-of-care option for patients with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT03142334 . All pts Prespecified risk subgroups Sarcomatoid features Intermediate-high High M1 NED Present Absent N 994 855 77 57 111 829 DFS events 429 342 49 37 59 339 DFS HR(95% CI) 0.71(0.59−0.86) 0.75 (0.61−0.93) 0.61(0.35−1.08) 0.48(0.25−0.92) 0.56(0.33−0.96) 0.75(0.60−0.92) OS events 167 131 22 13 23 130 OS HR(95% CI) 0.66(0.48−0.90) 0.65(0.46−0.92) 0.86(0.37−1.98) 0.36(0.11−1.18) 0.67(0.29−1.56) 0.64(0.45−0.91)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Ulsan College (KR), Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Harvard University (US), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Texas Oncology (US), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), The Royal Free Hospital (GB), Asan Medical Center (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), University of Ulsan (KR), Hôpital Saint-André (FR), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers (US), Provincial Polyclinical Hospital in Toruń (PL), University College London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Pennsylvania (US), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.