Clinical factors affecting clinical investigators’ (CIs) selection of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKis) for patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC).

e13097 Background: The clinical availability of three CDKis for the treatment of HR+ mBC has provided clinicians with important therapeutic options; however, minimal information exists on how available research findings, FDA approvals and current practice guidelines translate to clinical practice. Methods: In June 2024, 20 US-based and international CIs completed a case-based survey on their use of CDKis for HR+ mBC. A modest honorarium was offered. For each case question, one or more key clinical variables (eg, age, prior therapy, sites of metastases, comorbidities) were varied. Results: For a 65-year-old woman with de novo HR+ mBC, ribociclib was favored both for patients with asymptomatic bone metastases and for those with symptomatic visceral (including liver) metastases. For the same patient with asymptomatic brain metastases, abemaciclib was preferred and was also favored for patients with a recent history of myocardial infarction. In a similar manner, for an 85-year-old patient with multiple comorbidities and a difficult time managing polypharmacy, palbociclib was most frequently selected, although many CIs eliminate CDKi treatment altogether. Conclusions: Even in the absence of direct comparative clinical trial evidence, many CIs are tailoring their use of CDKis in certain situations according to factors including age, sites of metastases, comorbidities and other considerations. It would be interesting and relevant to explore whether matching approaches are being undertaken in community oncology practice. Clinical scenario(ER/PR+, HER2- de novo mBC) Choice of endocrine-based treatment 65-yo, asymptomatic bone mets R + AI: 17/20 (85%)P + AI: 2/20 (10%)A + AI: 1/20 (5%) 65-yo, symptomatic visceral (including liver) mets R + AI: 14/20 (70%)A + AI: 4/20 (20%)P + AI: 2/20 (10%) 65-yo, multiple asymptomatic brain mets A + AI: 10/20 (50%)R + AI: 7/20 (35%)P + AI: 2/20 (10%)Other: 1/20 (5%) 65-yo, 3 mo s/p MI, symptomatic visceral mets A + AI: 9/20 (45%)R + AI: 5/20 (25%)P + AI: 5/20 (25%)Other: 1/20 (5%) 85-yo, multiple comorbidities, symptomatic visceral mets P + AI: 6/20 (30%)AI: 4/20 (20%)Other: 10/20 (50%) R = ribociclib; AI = aromatase inhibitor; P = palbociclib; A = abemaciclib; MI = myocardial infarction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e13097
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical factors affecting clinical investigators’ (CIs) selection of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKis) for patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC).

Douglas Paley, Karl H. Pang, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Taylor C. Wallace et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Clinical factors affecting clinical investigators’ (CIs) selection of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKis) for patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC).

Douglas Paley, Karl H. Pang, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Taylor C. Wallace, Kathryn Ziel, Neil Love, Trenton Cruse, K. Miller, Gloria Kelly, Leijah Petelka
article en

Abstract

e13097 Background: The clinical availability of three CDKis for the treatment of HR+ mBC has provided clinicians with important therapeutic options; however, minimal information exists on how available research findings, FDA approvals and current practice guidelines translate to clinical practice. Methods: In June 2024, 20 US-based and international CIs completed a case-based survey on their use of CDKis for HR+ mBC. A modest honorarium was offered. For each case question, one or more key clinical variables (eg, age, prior therapy, sites of metastases, comorbidities) were varied. Results: For a 65-year-old woman with de novo HR+ mBC, ribociclib was favored both for patients with asymptomatic bone metastases and for those with symptomatic visceral (including liver) metastases. For the same patient with asymptomatic brain metastases, abemaciclib was preferred and was also favored for patients with a recent history of myocardial infarction. In a similar manner, for an 85-year-old patient with multiple comorbidities and a difficult time managing polypharmacy, palbociclib was most frequently selected, although many CIs eliminate CDKi treatment altogether. Conclusions: Even in the absence of direct comparative clinical trial evidence, many CIs are tailoring their use of CDKis in certain situations according to factors including age, sites of metastases, comorbidities and other considerations. It would be interesting and relevant to explore whether matching approaches are being undertaken in community oncology practice. Clinical scenario(ER/PR+, HER2- de novo mBC) Choice of endocrine-based treatment 65-yo, asymptomatic bone mets R + AI: 17/20 (85%)P + AI: 2/20 (10%)A + AI: 1/20 (5%) 65-yo, symptomatic visceral (including liver) mets R + AI: 14/20 (70%)A + AI: 4/20 (20%)P + AI: 2/20 (10%) 65-yo, multiple asymptomatic brain mets A + AI: 10/20 (50%)R + AI: 7/20 (35%)P + AI: 2/20 (10%)Other: 1/20 (5%) 65-yo, 3 mo s/p MI, symptomatic visceral mets A + AI: 9/20 (45%)R + AI: 5/20 (25%)P + AI: 5/20 (25%)Other: 1/20 (5%) 85-yo, multiple comorbidities, symptomatic visceral mets P + AI: 6/20 (30%)AI: 4/20 (20%)Other: 10/20 (50%) R = ribociclib; AI = aromatase inhibitor; P = palbociclib; A = abemaciclib; MI = myocardial infarction.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Texas Oncology (US), Baylor University Medical Center (US), Sarah Cannon (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.