Lung cancer diagnosis rates (LCDR) in lung cancer screening (LCS) and incidental pulmonary nodule (IPN) cohorts in the Mississippi Delta.

8002 Background: The LCDR in the CT screened cohort in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was 1.1% over a median of 6.5 years follow up. We evaluated the LCDR in a regional US community. Methods: Prospective cohort study of patients in LCS and IPN programs in 22 facilities across a 125 county service area population. We compared LCDR over 3 years in LCS stratified by Lung-RADS (L-R) score (1 to 4X), IPN by nodule size (≤6, &gt;6-15, &gt;15-20, &gt;20-30 mm) on initial CT scans. Comparisons used Chi-square tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Cox regression models with Hazard Ratios (HR) for lung cancer diagnosis adjusted for age, sex, race, and insurance. Results: From 2015 to 2023, 7121 persons were enrolled in LCS – 5447 (76%) L-R 1/2, 823 (12%) L-R 3, 452 (6%) L-R 4A, 205(3%) L-R 4B, and 114(2%) L-R 4X; and 22,455 in IPN - 8141 (36%) ≤6mm, 11177 (50%) &gt;6-15 mm, 1596 (7%) &gt;15-20 mm, 1535 (7%) &gt;20-30 mm. Over this period, 334 (4.7%) and 1016 (4.5%) were diagnosed with lung cancer in LCS and IPN cohorts, respectively, including 91 (2%), 40 (5%), 60 (13%), 68 (33%), and 66 (58%) L-R 1-4X and 69 (1%), 421 (4%), 224 (14%) and 302 (20%) of IPN cohort in ascending order of nodule size. The cumulative LCDR at 36 months were: 5% (95% CI 4.4 – 5.6) in LCS- 1.9% (1.5-2.4), 5.0% (3.4-7.0), 14%(10-18), 33%(27-40), and 60% (49-68) for L-R 1 to 4X, respectively; and 4.4% (4.1 – 4.7)- 0.66% (0.49-0.88), 3.5% (3.2-3.9), 14% (12-16) and 20% (18-22) for the respective IPN cohorts. With L-R 1/2 as reference, aHR for lung cancer diagnosis was 2.9 (2.0 - 4.1, p&lt;0.0001), 7.6 (5.4 - 10.6, p&lt;0.0001), 24.1 (17.4 - 33.4, p&lt;0.0001), and 66.3 (47.7 - 92.3, p&lt;0.0001) for L-R 3, 4A, 4B &amp; 4X in LCS cohort. With nodule &gt;6-15 as reference, aHR was 0.2 (0.2 - 0.3, p&lt;0.0001), 4.2(3.6 - 4.9, p&lt;0.0001) and 5.7 (4.9 - 6.7, p&lt;0.0001) in IPN cohort. Conclusions: LCDR of this Mississippi Delta LCS and IPN cohort was greater than 4-fold the NLST. The NLST significantly underestimates the potential impact of LCS in this population. LCS IPN 1-2 3 4A 4B 4X P 0-6mm 6-15 15-20 20-30 P N = 5447 N = 823 N = 452 N = 205 N = 114 N = 8147 N = 11177 N = 1596 N = 1535 Lung Cancer* 91 (2) 40 (5) 60 (13) 68 (33) 66 (58) &lt;0.0001 69(1) 421(4) 224 (14) 302(20) &lt;0.0001 Age Median (Q1 - Q3) 65 (60-70) 65 (60-70) 67 (61-71) 67 (63-73) 67 (63-72) &lt;0.0001 62 (51-72) 64 (52-74) 66 (53-75) 68 (57-77) &lt;0.0001 Female* 2795 (51) 400 (49) 218 (48) 107 (52) 57 (50) 0.4709 4777(59) 6191 (55) 884 (55) 788 (51) 0.0005 Black* 1005 (19) 157 (19) 87 (19) 37 (18) 25 (22) 0.972 2376(29) 3126 (28) 479 (30) 443 (29) 0.0713 Commercial insurance* 2168 (40) 297 (36) 142 (31) 58 (28) 30 (26) 0.0005 3612(44) 4544 (41) 596 (37) 515 (34) 0.0005 Never smoked* 13 (0.2) 3 (0.4) 0 0 0 0.4628 3662(45) 4537 (41) 549 (34)</ja

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.8002
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung cancer diagnosis rates (LCDR) in lung cancer screening (LCS) and incidental pulmonary nodule (IPN) cohorts in the Mississippi Delta.

Jordan Goss, Kourtney R. Dortch, Meredith Ray, Wei Liao et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Lung cancer diagnosis rates (LCDR) in lung cancer screening (LCS) and incidental pulmonary nodule (IPN) cohorts in the Mississippi Delta.

Jordan Goss, Kourtney R. Dortch, Meredith Ray, Wei Liao, Amanda Harris, Carrie Fehnel, Talat Qureshi, Sara Johnson, Osarenren Ogbeide, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon, Matthew Smeltzer
article en

Abstract

8002 Background: The LCDR in the CT screened cohort in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was 1.1% over a median of 6.5 years follow up. We evaluated the LCDR in a regional US community. Methods: Prospective cohort study of patients in LCS and IPN programs in 22 facilities across a 125 county service area population. We compared LCDR over 3 years in LCS stratified by Lung-RADS (L-R) score (1 to 4X), IPN by nodule size (≤6, &gt;6-15, &gt;15-20, &gt;20-30 mm) on initial CT scans. Comparisons used Chi-square tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Cox regression models with Hazard Ratios (HR) for lung cancer diagnosis adjusted for age, sex, race, and insurance. Results: From 2015 to 2023, 7121 persons were enrolled in LCS – 5447 (76%) L-R 1/2, 823 (12%) L-R 3, 452 (6%) L-R 4A, 205(3%) L-R 4B, and 114(2%) L-R 4X; and 22,455 in IPN - 8141 (36%) ≤6mm, 11177 (50%) &gt;6-15 mm, 1596 (7%) &gt;15-20 mm, 1535 (7%) &gt;20-30 mm. Over this period, 334 (4.7%) and 1016 (4.5%) were diagnosed with lung cancer in LCS and IPN cohorts, respectively, including 91 (2%), 40 (5%), 60 (13%), 68 (33%), and 66 (58%) L-R 1-4X and 69 (1%), 421 (4%), 224 (14%) and 302 (20%) of IPN cohort in ascending order of nodule size. The cumulative LCDR at 36 months were: 5% (95% CI 4.4 – 5.6) in LCS- 1.9% (1.5-2.4), 5.0% (3.4-7.0), 14%(10-18), 33%(27-40), and 60% (49-68) for L-R 1 to 4X, respectively; and 4.4% (4.1 – 4.7)- 0.66% (0.49-0.88), 3.5% (3.2-3.9), 14% (12-16) and 20% (18-22) for the respective IPN cohorts. With L-R 1/2 as reference, aHR for lung cancer diagnosis was 2.9 (2.0 - 4.1, p&lt;0.0001), 7.6 (5.4 - 10.6, p&lt;0.0001), 24.1 (17.4 - 33.4, p&lt;0.0001), and 66.3 (47.7 - 92.3, p&lt;0.0001) for L-R 3, 4A, 4B &amp; 4X in LCS cohort. With nodule &gt;6-15 as reference, aHR was 0.2 (0.2 - 0.3, p&lt;0.0001), 4.2(3.6 - 4.9, p&lt;0.0001) and 5.7 (4.9 - 6.7, p&lt;0.0001) in IPN cohort. Conclusions: LCDR of this Mississippi Delta LCS and IPN cohort was greater than 4-fold the NLST. The NLST significantly underestimates the potential impact of LCS in this population. LCS IPN 1-2 3 4A 4B 4X P 0-6mm 6-15 15-20 20-30 P N = 5447 N = 823 N = 452 N = 205 N = 114 N = 8147 N = 11177 N = 1596 N = 1535 Lung Cancer* 91 (2) 40 (5) 60 (13) 68 (33) 66 (58) &lt;0.0001 69(1) 421(4) 224 (14) 302(20) &lt;0.0001 Age Median (Q1 - Q3) 65 (60-70) 65 (60-70) 67 (61-71) 67 (63-73) 67 (63-72) &lt;0.0001 62 (51-72) 64 (52-74) 66 (53-75) 68 (57-77) &lt;0.0001 Female* 2795 (51) 400 (49) 218 (48) 107 (52) 57 (50) 0.4709 4777(59) 6191 (55) 884 (55) 788 (51) 0.0005 Black* 1005 (19) 157 (19) 87 (19) 37 (18) 25 (22) 0.972 2376(29) 3126 (28) 479 (30) 443 (29) 0.0713 Commercial insurance* 2168 (40) 297 (36) 142 (31) 58 (28) 30 (26) 0.0005 3612(44) 4544 (41) 596 (37) 515 (34) 0.0005 Never smoked* 13 (0.2) 3 (0.4) 0 0 0 0.4628 3662(45) 4537 (41) 549 (34)</ja

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.