Performance of cardiac implantable electronic devices in detecting premature ventricular contraction burden
CIEDs underestimate PVC burden compared with ambulatory cardiac monitoring. Clinicians should not solely rely on PVC data from CIEDs to rule out a clinically relevant PVC burden.
Authors
- Travis D. Richardson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9772-0308)
- Arvindh N. Kanagasundram (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-1528)
- George H. Crossley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0096-8401)
- Quinn S. Wells (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-0313)
- Giovanni Davogustto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2771-6466)
- Robert L. Abraham
- William G. Stevenson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-7893)
- Jay A. Montgomery (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9950-940X)
- Gregory F. Michaud (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8425-4455)
- Matthew G. Gayoso
- Frank E. Harrell
- Yue Gao
Institutions
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Heart Rhythm
- Published
- 2025-05-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.006
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.39
Funders
- Vanderbilt University
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Servier
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences