A randomized, phase 2/3 clinical trial investigating RP2 plus nivolumab vs ipilimumab plus nivolumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

TPS9597 Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy, accounting for nearly 90% of ocular melanomas and up to 5% of melanomas overall. Approximately 50% of patients (pts) with UM will develop metastatic disease, with the liver being the most common site of metastases (~90%). The prognosis for pts with metastatic UM (mUM) is poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 1 year. Effective treatment options for mUM are limited as it responds poorly to single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs; <10% response rate). Response rates are slightly higher with combination therapies (12%–18%), but often at the expense of increased toxicity. Tebentafusp is FDA approved for mUM based on survival benefit; however, its use is restricted to pts who are HLA-A*02:01 positive, and only ~10% of pts achieve an objective response. RP2 is a selectively replication-competent herpes simplex virus type 1–based oncolytic immunotherapy expressing GM-CSF, a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP-R–), and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule. Prior phase 1 preliminary clinical data of RP2 as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab (nivo) demonstrated a promising safety profile and anti-tumor activity with an ORR of 29.4% in 17 patients with mUM, most of whom had received prior ICIs. This study will assess the efficacy and safety of RP2 + nivo vs ipilimumab (ipi) + nivo in pts with ICI-naïve mUM (NCT06581406; RP2-202). Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, phase 2/3 study. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years and confirmed unresectable mUM with lesions amenable to injection. Pts with metastatic disease who have had prior exposure to ICIs since the time of UM diagnosis, involvement of >33.3% of the liver, or a history of prior liver- or lesion-directed therapy are not eligible for enrollment. Enrolled pts (N = ~280) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either RP2 + nivo or ipi + nivo. In the RP2 + nivo arm, RP2 will be given intratumorally initially at 1 x 10 6 PFU/mL, then every 2 weeks (Q2W) at 1 x 10 7 PFU/mL for 7 doses in combination with intravenous (IV) nivo (240 mg). In the ipi + nivo arm, pts will receive IV ipi (3 mg/kg) and IV nivo (1 mg/kg) Q3W for 4 doses. Pts in both arms may then receive IV nivo at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W for up to 2 years from the first dose. The co-primary endpoints are OS and progression-free survival by independent central review using RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of clinical benefit, and safety, including incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and immune-mediated AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT06581406 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.tps9597
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomized, phase 2/3 clinical trial investigating RP2 plus nivolumab vs ipilimumab plus nivolumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

Rahul Marpadga, Diwakar Davar, Marlana Orloff, Sapna Pradyuman Patel et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
3.41
article

A randomized, phase 2/3 clinical trial investigating RP2 plus nivolumab vs ipilimumab plus nivolumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

Rahul Marpadga, Diwakar Davar, Marlana Orloff, Sapna Pradyuman Patel, Alexander Noor Shoushtari, Giuseppe Gullo, Mark Navarro, Jessica Cecile Hassel, Allison Betof Warner, Joseph J. Sacco, Justin C. Moser, Anthony M. Joshua, Richard D. Carvajal, Ryan J. Sullivan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

TPS9597 Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy, accounting for nearly 90% of ocular melanomas and up to 5% of melanomas overall. Approximately 50% of patients (pts) with UM will develop metastatic disease, with the liver being the most common site of metastases (~90%). The prognosis for pts with metastatic UM (mUM) is poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 1 year. Effective treatment options for mUM are limited as it responds poorly to single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs; <10% response rate). Response rates are slightly higher with combination therapies (12%–18%), but often at the expense of increased toxicity. Tebentafusp is FDA approved for mUM based on survival benefit; however, its use is restricted to pts who are HLA-A*02:01 positive, and only ~10% of pts achieve an objective response. RP2 is a selectively replication-competent herpes simplex virus type 1–based oncolytic immunotherapy expressing GM-CSF, a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP-R–), and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule. Prior phase 1 preliminary clinical data of RP2 as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab (nivo) demonstrated a promising safety profile and anti-tumor activity with an ORR of 29.4% in 17 patients with mUM, most of whom had received prior ICIs. This study will assess the efficacy and safety of RP2 + nivo vs ipilimumab (ipi) + nivo in pts with ICI-naïve mUM (NCT06581406; RP2-202). Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, phase 2/3 study. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years and confirmed unresectable mUM with lesions amenable to injection. Pts with metastatic disease who have had prior exposure to ICIs since the time of UM diagnosis, involvement of >33.3% of the liver, or a history of prior liver- or lesion-directed therapy are not eligible for enrollment. Enrolled pts (N = ~280) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either RP2 + nivo or ipi + nivo. In the RP2 + nivo arm, RP2 will be given intratumorally initially at 1 x 10 6 PFU/mL, then every 2 weeks (Q2W) at 1 x 10 7 PFU/mL for 7 doses in combination with intravenous (IV) nivo (240 mg). In the ipi + nivo arm, pts will receive IV ipi (3 mg/kg) and IV nivo (1 mg/kg) Q3W for 4 doses. Pts in both arms may then receive IV nivo at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W for up to 2 years from the first dose. The co-primary endpoints are OS and progression-free survival by independent central review using RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of clinical benefit, and safety, including incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and immune-mediated AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT06581406 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Northwell Health (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Liverpool (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), HonorHealth (US), University of Colorado Cancer Center (US), Stanford Medicine (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
3.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.