Comparative Analysis of RT-PCR and a Colloidal Gold Immunochromatographic Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for rapid, accurate, and accessible diagnostic testing to effectively manage and contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. RT-PCR is widely recognized as the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection due to its high sensitivity and specificity. However, RT-PCR testing requires specialized laboratory equipment, highly trained personnel, and extended processing times, which limits its feasibility for large-scale screening and point-of-care applications. This study aims to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of RT-PCR and a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA). <b>Methods</b>: By comparing these two methods, we seek to determine a GICA's effectiveness as a complementary or alternative diagnostic tool, particularly in resource-limited settings and scenarios requiring rapid, large-scale testing. We assessed the following key clinical parameters: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy. Additionally, we investigated the correlation between GICA signal intensity and RT-PCR Ct values using regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the calculated area under the curve. <b>Results</b>: Our findings indicate that while RT-PCR exhibits superior sensitivity, GICA results demonstrate a strong correlation with RT-PCR results and provide a rapid, cost-effective alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Unlike RT-PCR, which requires extensive resources and prolonged turnaround times, a GICA delivers results within 20 min, making it a viable option for decentralized testing and real-time public health interventions. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results suggest that a GICA can serve as a complementary diagnostic tool alongside RT-PCR, particularly in resource-limited settings and high-throughput screening scenarios. By integrating GICAs into broader testing strategies, healthcare systems can enhance early detection efforts, improve accessibility to diagnostics, and strengthen pandemic response measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of RT-PCR and a Colloidal Gold Immunochromatographic Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

Calvin Lui, Harlan L. Pietz, Carl Urban, Nishant Prasad et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.40
article

Comparative Analysis of RT-PCR and a Colloidal Gold Immunochromatographic Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

Calvin Lui, Harlan L. Pietz, Carl Urban, Nishant Prasad, William H. Rodgers, George D. Rodriguez, Eric Konadu, James Truong, Mingyu Shao, Dakai Liu, Keither K. James, Andrew M. Schreiner, Qiang Zhou, Junyu Chen, Vishnu Singh, Hui Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for rapid, accurate, and accessible diagnostic testing to effectively manage and contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. RT-PCR is widely recognized as the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection due to its high sensitivity and specificity. However, RT-PCR testing requires specialized laboratory equipment, highly trained personnel, and extended processing times, which limits its feasibility for large-scale screening and point-of-care applications. This study aims to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of RT-PCR and a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA). <b>Methods</b>: By comparing these two methods, we seek to determine a GICA's effectiveness as a complementary or alternative diagnostic tool, particularly in resource-limited settings and scenarios requiring rapid, large-scale testing. We assessed the following key clinical parameters: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy. Additionally, we investigated the correlation between GICA signal intensity and RT-PCR Ct values using regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the calculated area under the curve. <b>Results</b>: Our findings indicate that while RT-PCR exhibits superior sensitivity, GICA results demonstrate a strong correlation with RT-PCR results and provide a rapid, cost-effective alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Unlike RT-PCR, which requires extensive resources and prolonged turnaround times, a GICA delivers results within 20 min, making it a viable option for decentralized testing and real-time public health interventions. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results suggest that a GICA can serve as a complementary diagnostic tool alongside RT-PCR, particularly in resource-limited settings and high-throughput screening scenarios. By integrating GICAs into broader testing strategies, healthcare systems can enhance early detection efforts, improve accessibility to diagnostics, and strengthen pandemic response measures.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(11)
Cornell University (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Yale University, Eastern Virginia Medical School
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.