Comparison of the air kerma standards of ARPANSA, Australia, and the IAEA in RQR, RQA, and RQT diagnostic X-ray beams

A comparison of air kerma standards between the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was carried out for the RQR, RQA and RQT radiation qualities (as prescribed by IEC 61267 or IAEA TRS 457) using two ionisation chambers as transfer standards. The ratios between the IAEA and ARPANSA calibration coefficients ranged between 0.993 and 0.997 for RQR beams, 0.990 and 0.999 for RQA beams, and 0.993 to 0.994 for RQT beams. The relative expanded uncertainty for IAEA and ARPANSA was 1.2 and 1.4% respectively, and the comparison results agree at around the level of, or better than, the combined standard uncertainty of 0.74% for all the beams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01570-w
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the air kerma standards of ARPANSA, Australia, and the IAEA in RQR, RQA, and RQT diagnostic X-ray beams

Kam L. Lee, Peter Thomas, Z. Msimang, J. V. Cardoso et al.
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Comparison of the air kerma standards of ARPANSA, Australia, and the IAEA in RQR, RQA, and RQT diagnostic X-ray beams

Kam L. Lee, Peter Thomas, Z. Msimang, J. V. Cardoso, Duncan Butler
article en

Abstract

A comparison of air kerma standards between the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was carried out for the RQR, RQA and RQT radiation qualities (as prescribed by IEC 61267 or IAEA TRS 457) using two ionisation chambers as transfer standards. The ratios between the IAEA and ARPANSA calibration coefficients ranged between 0.993 and 0.997 for RQR beams, 0.990 and 0.999 for RQA beams, and 0.993 to 0.994 for RQT beams. The relative expanded uncertainty for IAEA and ARPANSA was 1.2 and 1.4% respectively, and the comparison results agree at around the level of, or better than, the combined standard uncertainty of 0.74% for all the beams.

Physical and Engineering Sciences in MedicineVol. 48(3)
International Atomic Energy Agency (AT), Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.