Factors influencing clinical trial enrollment in glioblastoma patients: A retrospective study at the University of Vermont Medical Center.

2054 Background: The standard of care for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is a combination therapy of radiation and temozolomide. NCCN guidelines recommend clinical trials should be offered to glioblastoma patients when appropriate. This study aims to investigate the number of patients enrolled in clinical trials at the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC) and/or referred to larger academic centers for trials. This study sought to identify and analyze characteristics of patients enrolled in trials at UVMMC and other outside academic centers. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of the electronic health records of ninety patients with GBM from 2021 to 2023 who were followed at UVMMC. Patient age, gender, and educational and employment status were collected. We assessed all comers who were offered a clinical trial, patients who proceeded to enroll in a clinical trial, and factors that influenced enrollment. We also assessed location where the trial was conducted (UVMMC vs Outside Center) and the trial interventions provided at the various centers. Results: We assessed 90 patients diagnosed with GBM at UVMMC from 2021-2023. 87% of all patients were offered the opportunity to enroll in a clinical trial. 17% of patients who were offered a trial successfully enrolled. Amongst enrolled patients, 62% completed their clinical trial at UVMMC while 38% were referred and treated at nearby academic centers in the New England Area including Mass General Hospital and Dana-Faber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Intrinsic barriers to enrollment included poor Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) scores, MGMT negative status, presence of leptomeningeal disease, and deep tumor locations precluding resection. Extrinsic factors included distance to academic centers, trial closure to accrual, and socioeconomic status. There was a correlation between socioeconomic status and trial enrollment. Of the thirty-eight patients identified with higher educational attainment (college or higher), 87% were offered a clinical trial and 18% eventually enrolled. Among the non-college educated group of thirty-six, 92% were offered a trial. However, only 14% enrolled. Further analysis on age, gender, and clinical trial intervention will be reported in future publications. Conclusions: Expanding access to clinical trials is critical to optimizing care for GBM patients. Our findings highlight access to academic centers is crucial to clinical trial enrollment. Further studies analyzing modifiable barriers to clinical trial accrual are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.2054
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing clinical trial enrollment in glioblastoma patients: A retrospective study at the University of Vermont Medical Center.

Oluwatosin Akintola, Shrey Patel, Leena Ziane
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Factors influencing clinical trial enrollment in glioblastoma patients: A retrospective study at the University of Vermont Medical Center.

Oluwatosin Akintola, Shrey Patel, Leena Ziane
article en

Abstract

2054 Background: The standard of care for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is a combination therapy of radiation and temozolomide. NCCN guidelines recommend clinical trials should be offered to glioblastoma patients when appropriate. This study aims to investigate the number of patients enrolled in clinical trials at the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC) and/or referred to larger academic centers for trials. This study sought to identify and analyze characteristics of patients enrolled in trials at UVMMC and other outside academic centers. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of the electronic health records of ninety patients with GBM from 2021 to 2023 who were followed at UVMMC. Patient age, gender, and educational and employment status were collected. We assessed all comers who were offered a clinical trial, patients who proceeded to enroll in a clinical trial, and factors that influenced enrollment. We also assessed location where the trial was conducted (UVMMC vs Outside Center) and the trial interventions provided at the various centers. Results: We assessed 90 patients diagnosed with GBM at UVMMC from 2021-2023. 87% of all patients were offered the opportunity to enroll in a clinical trial. 17% of patients who were offered a trial successfully enrolled. Amongst enrolled patients, 62% completed their clinical trial at UVMMC while 38% were referred and treated at nearby academic centers in the New England Area including Mass General Hospital and Dana-Faber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Intrinsic barriers to enrollment included poor Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) scores, MGMT negative status, presence of leptomeningeal disease, and deep tumor locations precluding resection. Extrinsic factors included distance to academic centers, trial closure to accrual, and socioeconomic status. There was a correlation between socioeconomic status and trial enrollment. Of the thirty-eight patients identified with higher educational attainment (college or higher), 87% were offered a clinical trial and 18% eventually enrolled. Among the non-college educated group of thirty-six, 92% were offered a trial. However, only 14% enrolled. Further analysis on age, gender, and clinical trial intervention will be reported in future publications. Conclusions: Expanding access to clinical trials is critical to optimizing care for GBM patients. Our findings highlight access to academic centers is crucial to clinical trial enrollment. Further studies analyzing modifiable barriers to clinical trial accrual are needed.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Vermont (US), University of Vermont Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.