Estimating Total Lung Volume from Pixel-Level Thickness Maps of Chest Radiographs Using Deep Learning

Purpose To estimate the total lung volume (TLV) from real and synthetic frontal chest radiographs on a pixel level using lung thickness maps generated by a U-Net deep learning model. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 5959 chest CT scans from two public datasets, the Lung Nodule Analysis 2016 (Luna16) (<i>n</i> = 656) and the Radiological Society of North America Pulmonary Embolism Detection Challenge 2020 (<i>n</i> = 5303). Additionally, 72 participants were selected from the Klinikum Rechts der Isar dataset (October 2018 through December 2019), each with a corresponding chest radiograph obtained within 7 days. Synthetic radiographs and lung thickness maps were generated using forward projection of CT scans and their lung segmentations. A U-Net model was trained on synthetic radiographs to predict lung thickness maps and estimate TLV. Model performance was assessed using mean squared error (MSE), Pearson correlation coefficient, and two-sided Student <i>t</i> distribution. Results The study included 72 participants (45 male and 27 female participants; 33 healthy participants: mean age, 62 years [range, 34-80 years]; 39 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mean age, 69 years [range, 47-91 years]). TLV predictions showed low error rates (MSE<sub>Public-Synthetic</sub>, 0.16 L<sup>2</sup>; MSE<sub>KRI-Synthetic</sub>, 0.20 L<sup>2</sup>; MSE<sub>KRI-Real</sub>, 0.35 L<sup>2</sup>) and strong correlations with CT-derived reference standard TLV (<i>n</i><sub>Public-Synthetic</sub>, 1191; <i>r</i> = 0.99; <i>P</i> < .001) (<i>n</i><sub>KRI-Synthetic</sub>, 72; <i>r</i> = 0.97; <i>P</i> < .001) (<i>n</i><sub>KRI-Real</sub>, 72; <i>r</i> = 0.91; <i>P</i> < .001). When evaluated on different datasets, the U-Net model achieved the highest performance for TLV estimation on the Luna16 test dataset, with the lowest MSE (0.09 L<sup>2</sup>) and strongest correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.99; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with CT-derived TLV. Conclusion The U-Net-generated pixel-level lung thickness maps successfully estimated TLV for both synthetic and real radiographs. <b>Keywords:</b> Frontal Chest Radiographs, Lung Thickness Map, Pixel-Level, Total Lung Volume, U-Net <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240484
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Total Lung Volume from Pixel-Level Thickness Maps of Chest Radiographs Using Deep Learning

Korbinian Mechlem, Manuel Schultheiß, Philipp Schmette, Franz Pfeiffer et al.
2 citations
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.72
article

Estimating Total Lung Volume from Pixel-Level Thickness Maps of Chest Radiographs Using Deep Learning

Korbinian Mechlem, Manuel Schultheiß, Philipp Schmette, Franz Pfeiffer, Daniela Pfeiffer, Florian T. Gassert, Kirsten Taphorn, Thorsten Sellerer, Tina Dorosti, Johannes Thalhammer, Florian Schaff, Lorenz Birnbacher, Rafael Schick, Jule Heuchert
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose To estimate the total lung volume (TLV) from real and synthetic frontal chest radiographs on a pixel level using lung thickness maps generated by a U-Net deep learning model. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 5959 chest CT scans from two public datasets, the Lung Nodule Analysis 2016 (Luna16) (<i>n</i> = 656) and the Radiological Society of North America Pulmonary Embolism Detection Challenge 2020 (<i>n</i> = 5303). Additionally, 72 participants were selected from the Klinikum Rechts der Isar dataset (October 2018 through December 2019), each with a corresponding chest radiograph obtained within 7 days. Synthetic radiographs and lung thickness maps were generated using forward projection of CT scans and their lung segmentations. A U-Net model was trained on synthetic radiographs to predict lung thickness maps and estimate TLV. Model performance was assessed using mean squared error (MSE), Pearson correlation coefficient, and two-sided Student <i>t</i> distribution. Results The study included 72 participants (45 male and 27 female participants; 33 healthy participants: mean age, 62 years [range, 34-80 years]; 39 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mean age, 69 years [range, 47-91 years]). TLV predictions showed low error rates (MSE<sub>Public-Synthetic</sub>, 0.16 L<sup>2</sup>; MSE<sub>KRI-Synthetic</sub>, 0.20 L<sup>2</sup>; MSE<sub>KRI-Real</sub>, 0.35 L<sup>2</sup>) and strong correlations with CT-derived reference standard TLV (<i>n</i><sub>Public-Synthetic</sub>, 1191; <i>r</i> = 0.99; <i>P</i> < .001) (<i>n</i><sub>KRI-Synthetic</sub>, 72; <i>r</i> = 0.97; <i>P</i> < .001) (<i>n</i><sub>KRI-Real</sub>, 72; <i>r</i> = 0.91; <i>P</i> < .001). When evaluated on different datasets, the U-Net model achieved the highest performance for TLV estimation on the Luna16 test dataset, with the lowest MSE (0.09 L<sup>2</sup>) and strongest correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.99; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with CT-derived TLV. Conclusion The U-Net-generated pixel-level lung thickness maps successfully estimated TLV for both synthetic and real radiographs. <b>Keywords:</b> Frontal Chest Radiographs, Lung Thickness Map, Pixel-Level, Total Lung Volume, U-Net <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7(4)
TUM Klinikum (DE), Institute for Advanced Study (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.