A phase 2 study of pemigatinib for pre-treated glioblastoma or other gliomas with activating FGFR1-3 alterations: Results from FIGHT-209.

2003 Background: FGFR genomic alterations occur in approximately 8% of gliomas. Inhibition of FGFR1-3 with pemigatinib showed antitumor activity in a multihistology basket trial (FIGHT-207) in which approximately 10% of participants (pts) had recurrent/progressive FGFR-altered glioblastoma (GBM). We further investigated pemigatinib activity in primary brain tumors by conducting an international, multicenter, single-arm, 2-cohort, phase 2 study specifically in adults with FGFR-altered pretreated gliomas (FIGHT-209; NCT05267106). Methods: Pts were enrolled in 2 cohorts: A, histologically or molecularly defined GBM; or B, other gliomas, glioneuronal tumors, and neuronal tumors. Eligible pts had tumors harboring a FGFR1-3 fusion/rearrangement or mutation detected by an accredited laboratory that had recurred/progressed after ≥1 prior therapy. Pemigatinib (oral, 13.5 mg on days 1-14/21) was intended to continue until progression by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria determined by an independent review committee (IRC) or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy of each cohort was evaluated independently. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; partial plus complete) per RANO (cohort A), with a goal of > 28%. Key secondary and exploratory endpoints were ORR in cohort B, ORR by investigator assessment, progression-free survival (PFS) by IRC, overall survival (OS), safety, neurologic function by Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO), and efficacy correlations with diagnosis and specific FGFR-alterations. Results: Between May 2022 and December 2023, 74 pts were enrolled in cohort A and 9 in cohort B. FGFR1-3 fusions/rearrangements were the most common genomic alterations in cohort A (n = 65 [88%]) and in cohort B, FGFR1 mutations (n = 8 [89%]). Pts had a median (range) age of 56 (20-79) years; 60% were male. On September 27, 2024 (data cutoff), 16 pts remained on treatment (cohort A, n = 11 [15%]; cohort B, n = 5 [56%]); 67 discontinued, primarily due to progressive disease (n = 59 [71%]). In cohort A, ORR was 8% (6 partial responses [PR], 0 complete responses [CR]); 21 pts (28%) had stable disease (SD); estimated 6-month PFS rate was 17% (95% CI, 8.7-27.8) and 12-month OS rate 48% (95% CI, 35.6-60.2). In cohort B, the ORR was 22% (1 CR, 1 PR); 3 (33%) SD. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were low grade in severity (grade ≥3, 36.1%). Hyperphosphatemia, a class effect of FGFR inhibitors, was the most common AE (75%); 6 pts (7%) required dose reduction and 4 pts (5%) discontinued due to AEs. Conclusions: ORR did not meet the pre-specified goal of > 28% among pts with GBM harboring pemigatinib-sensitizing FGFR alterations. However, durable disease stabilization was observed, notably in pts with CNS tumors other than GBM, and toxicities were manageable. More mature PFS and OS data will be presented with exploratory molecular correlations. Clinical trial information: NCT05267106 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.2003
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase 2 study of pemigatinib for pre-treated glioblastoma or other gliomas with activating FGFR1-3 alterations: Results from FIGHT-209.

María Vieito, Stephen Bagley, Martin J. van den Bent, Catherine McBain et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
3.22
article

A phase 2 study of pemigatinib for pre-treated glioblastoma or other gliomas with activating FGFR1-3 alterations: Results from FIGHT-209.

María Vieito, Stephen Bagley, Martin J. van den Bent, Catherine McBain, Roy E. Strowd, Yufei Guo, Manmeet S. Ahluwalia, Andrew B. Lassman, Louis Viviers, Enrico Franceschi, Delphine Larrieu‐Ciron, Lalanthica Yogendran, Marc Sanson, Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot, Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez, Alessia Pellerino, Yoshitaka Narita, Natália Cristina de Oliveira, Giuseppe Lombardi, Estela Pineda
article en
4 citations

Abstract

2003 Background: FGFR genomic alterations occur in approximately 8% of gliomas. Inhibition of FGFR1-3 with pemigatinib showed antitumor activity in a multihistology basket trial (FIGHT-207) in which approximately 10% of participants (pts) had recurrent/progressive FGFR-altered glioblastoma (GBM). We further investigated pemigatinib activity in primary brain tumors by conducting an international, multicenter, single-arm, 2-cohort, phase 2 study specifically in adults with FGFR-altered pretreated gliomas (FIGHT-209; NCT05267106). Methods: Pts were enrolled in 2 cohorts: A, histologically or molecularly defined GBM; or B, other gliomas, glioneuronal tumors, and neuronal tumors. Eligible pts had tumors harboring a FGFR1-3 fusion/rearrangement or mutation detected by an accredited laboratory that had recurred/progressed after ≥1 prior therapy. Pemigatinib (oral, 13.5 mg on days 1-14/21) was intended to continue until progression by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria determined by an independent review committee (IRC) or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy of each cohort was evaluated independently. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; partial plus complete) per RANO (cohort A), with a goal of > 28%. Key secondary and exploratory endpoints were ORR in cohort B, ORR by investigator assessment, progression-free survival (PFS) by IRC, overall survival (OS), safety, neurologic function by Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO), and efficacy correlations with diagnosis and specific FGFR-alterations. Results: Between May 2022 and December 2023, 74 pts were enrolled in cohort A and 9 in cohort B. FGFR1-3 fusions/rearrangements were the most common genomic alterations in cohort A (n = 65 [88%]) and in cohort B, FGFR1 mutations (n = 8 [89%]). Pts had a median (range) age of 56 (20-79) years; 60% were male. On September 27, 2024 (data cutoff), 16 pts remained on treatment (cohort A, n = 11 [15%]; cohort B, n = 5 [56%]); 67 discontinued, primarily due to progressive disease (n = 59 [71%]). In cohort A, ORR was 8% (6 partial responses [PR], 0 complete responses [CR]); 21 pts (28%) had stable disease (SD); estimated 6-month PFS rate was 17% (95% CI, 8.7-27.8) and 12-month OS rate 48% (95% CI, 35.6-60.2). In cohort B, the ORR was 22% (1 CR, 1 PR); 3 (33%) SD. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were low grade in severity (grade ≥3, 36.1%). Hyperphosphatemia, a class effect of FGFR inhibitors, was the most common AE (75%); 6 pts (7%) required dose reduction and 4 pts (5%) discontinued due to AEs. Conclusions: ORR did not meet the pre-specified goal of > 28% among pts with GBM harboring pemigatinib-sensitizing FGFR alterations. However, durable disease stabilization was observed, notably in pts with CNS tumors other than GBM, and toxicities were manageable. More mature PFS and OS data will be presented with exploratory molecular correlations. Clinical trial information: NCT05267106 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (US), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Pennsylvania Hospital (US), Odense University Hospital (DK), Sorbonne Université (FR), Baptist Health South Florida (US), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Institut Claudius Regaud (FR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), UC Irvine Health (US), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Tokyo National Hospital (JP), Wake Forest University (US), Columbia University (US)
Incyte
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.