MELODY: A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET/AGO-B-062, NCT 05559411).

TPS627 Background: In the last decades, the proportion of breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving surgery has increased, reaching 70-80% in developed countries. In case of non-palpable lesions, surgical excision requires some form of breast localization. While wire-guided localization has long been considered gold standard, it carries several limitations, including logistical difficulties, the potential for displacement and patient discomfort, and re-excision rates reaching 21% (in DCIS up to 30%). Other techniques (radioactive seed or radio-occult lesion localization, intraoperative ultrasound, magnetic, radiofrequency, and radar localization) have been developed with the aim of overcoming these disadvantages. However, comparative data on the rates of successful lesion removal, negative margins, and re-operations are limited. In most studies, the patient perspective, addressing e.g. discomfort and pain, has not been evaluated. The aim of MELODY (MEthods for LOcalization of Different types of breast lesions) is to evaluate different imaging-guided localization methods with regard to oncological safety, patient-reported outcomes, surgeon and radiologist satisfaction and economic impact. Methods: The EUBREAST and the iBRA-NET have initiated the MELODY study to assess breast localization techniques and devices from several perspectives (NCT05559411, http://eubreast.org/melody ). MELODY is a prospective intergroup cohort study which enrolls female and male patients. planned for breast-conserving surgery with imaging-guided localization for invasive breast cancer or DCIS. Multiple or bilateral lesions and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed. Primary outcomes are: 1) Intended target lesion and/or marker removal, independent of margin status on final histopathology, and 2) Negative resection margin rates at first surgery. Secondary outcomes are, among others: rates of second surgery and secondary mastectomy, Resection Ratio (defined as actual resection volume divided by the calculated optimum specimen volume), duration of surgery, marker dislocation rates, rates of marker placement or localization failure, patient-reported outcomes, rates of “lost markers”, radiologist and surgeon satisfaction, and health economic evaluation of the different techniques. Target accrual is 7,416 patients. Enrollment started in January 2023. Until 24 January 2025, 3938 patients from 20 countries were enrolled in the study. The study is expected to complete patient enrollment in year 2026. The study will be conducted in 30 countries and is supported by the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC), AWOgyn, AGO-B, SENATURK, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS) and the Korean Breast Cancer Study Group (KBCSG). Clinical trial information: NCT05559411 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.tps627
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MELODY: A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET/AGO-B-062, NCT 05559411).

Neslihan Cabıoğlu, Rosa Di Micco, S. Alran, Oreste ­Gentilini et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

MELODY: A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET/AGO-B-062, NCT 05559411).

Neslihan Cabıoğlu, Rosa Di Micco, S. Alran, Oreste ­Gentilini, James Harvey, Yazan Masannat, Thorsten Kühn, Nina Ditsch, Güldeniz Karadeniz Çakmak, Lina Pankratjevaitė, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Jana de Boniface, Steffi Hartmann, Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov, Dawid Murawa, Maggie Banys‐Paluchowski, William P. Weber, Andreas Karakatsanis, Natalia Krawczyk, Jai Min Ryu
article en

Abstract

TPS627 Background: In the last decades, the proportion of breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving surgery has increased, reaching 70-80% in developed countries. In case of non-palpable lesions, surgical excision requires some form of breast localization. While wire-guided localization has long been considered gold standard, it carries several limitations, including logistical difficulties, the potential for displacement and patient discomfort, and re-excision rates reaching 21% (in DCIS up to 30%). Other techniques (radioactive seed or radio-occult lesion localization, intraoperative ultrasound, magnetic, radiofrequency, and radar localization) have been developed with the aim of overcoming these disadvantages. However, comparative data on the rates of successful lesion removal, negative margins, and re-operations are limited. In most studies, the patient perspective, addressing e.g. discomfort and pain, has not been evaluated. The aim of MELODY (MEthods for LOcalization of Different types of breast lesions) is to evaluate different imaging-guided localization methods with regard to oncological safety, patient-reported outcomes, surgeon and radiologist satisfaction and economic impact. Methods: The EUBREAST and the iBRA-NET have initiated the MELODY study to assess breast localization techniques and devices from several perspectives (NCT05559411, http://eubreast.org/melody ). MELODY is a prospective intergroup cohort study which enrolls female and male patients. planned for breast-conserving surgery with imaging-guided localization for invasive breast cancer or DCIS. Multiple or bilateral lesions and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed. Primary outcomes are: 1) Intended target lesion and/or marker removal, independent of margin status on final histopathology, and 2) Negative resection margin rates at first surgery. Secondary outcomes are, among others: rates of second surgery and secondary mastectomy, Resection Ratio (defined as actual resection volume divided by the calculated optimum specimen volume), duration of surgery, marker dislocation rates, rates of marker placement or localization failure, patient-reported outcomes, rates of “lost markers”, radiologist and surgeon satisfaction, and health economic evaluation of the different techniques. Target accrual is 7,416 patients. Enrollment started in January 2023. Until 24 January 2025, 3938 patients from 20 countries were enrolled in the study. The study is expected to complete patient enrollment in year 2026. The study will be conducted in 30 countries and is supported by the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC), AWOgyn, AGO-B, SENATURK, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS) and the Korean Breast Cancer Study Group (KBCSG). Clinical trial information: NCT05559411 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), University of Basel (CH), Universität Ulm (DE), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), Samsung Medical Center (KR), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR), Ospedale regionale di Lugano (CH), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Saint Göran Hospital (SE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph (FR), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Zielona Góra (PL), University of Rostock (DE), Istanbul University (TR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), University of Lübeck (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.