Estimated prevalence of pathogenic variants in patients with breast, colon, and/or endometrial cancer who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing.

10577 Background: Patients with cancer who carry pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary cancer genes often have improved outcomes when their treatment is guided by their germline genetics. Identifying germline PVs also allows cascade testing of family members to pursue cancer prevention interventions. Guidelines recommend genetic testing for patients with female breast (BC), colorectal (CRC), or endometrial cancer (EC) who meet specific criteria, including early age at diagnosis and/or family history (FH). However, many patients with cancer who do not meet these guidelines may unknowingly carry PVs and may, therefore, receive suboptimal care. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to analyze trends in the prevalence of PVs based on age and FH in a consecutive cohort of patients referred for hereditary cancer testing (MyRisk, Myriad Genetics). We report model-based prevalence estimates for patients without FH diagnosed with BC, CRC, or EC at various ages. Prevalence is summarized overall for 25-48 hereditary cancer genes and for genes most frequently implicated in each cancer type. Results: Estimates of prevalence of PVs among patients with BC and CRC decreased substantially with age of diagnosis (Table 1). For patients with BC/CRC (respectively) without FH, overall prevalence estimates were 13.0%/11.8% among those diagnosed at age 30, 6.9%/7.1% at age 50 and 2.5%/3.2% at age 80. Among BC patients, PVs were most frequently identified in the BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 genes. Among CRC patients, PVs were most prevalent in the Lynch syndrome genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 . Prevalence was not significantly associated with age at EC diagnosis. Women with no FH had overall prevalence estimates of 7.5% if diagnosed with EC at age 30, 7.3% at age 50 and 7.1% at age 80 (Table 1). PVs were most common in the aforementioned Lynch syndrome genes. Conclusions: These results support existing literature that a substantial fraction of patients who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing may carry PVs, including a high prevalence of PVs among EC patients without FH, regardless of age at diagnosis. Elimination of age-based restrictions on genetic testing could improve the survival of cancer patients and their family members. Estimated prevalence (%) according to age of diagnosis among patients with no family history of cancer. Age at dx 30 40 50 60 70 80 BC 13.0% 9.5% 6.9% 5.0% 3.5% 2.5% CRC 11.8% 9.2% 7.1% 5.5% 4.2% 3.2% EC 7.5% 7.4% 7.3% 7.2% 7.2% 7.1% BC a 12.3% 8.3% 5.6% 3.7% 2.4% 1.6% CRC b 7.3% 5.1% 3.5% 2.4% 1.7% 1.1% EC b 4.4% 4.3% 4.3% 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% BC=breast cancer; CRC=colorectal cancer; dx=diagnosis; EC=endometrial cancer. a BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, or PALB2. b MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.10577
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimated prevalence of pathogenic variants in patients with breast, colon, and/or endometrial cancer who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing.

Matthew Kucera, Ryan Bernhisel, Stephanie Rieder, Elisha Hughes et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Estimated prevalence of pathogenic variants in patients with breast, colon, and/or endometrial cancer who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing.

Matthew Kucera, Ryan Bernhisel, Stephanie Rieder, Elisha Hughes, Joan L. Walker, Shelly Cummings, E. W. Smith
article en

Abstract

10577 Background: Patients with cancer who carry pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary cancer genes often have improved outcomes when their treatment is guided by their germline genetics. Identifying germline PVs also allows cascade testing of family members to pursue cancer prevention interventions. Guidelines recommend genetic testing for patients with female breast (BC), colorectal (CRC), or endometrial cancer (EC) who meet specific criteria, including early age at diagnosis and/or family history (FH). However, many patients with cancer who do not meet these guidelines may unknowingly carry PVs and may, therefore, receive suboptimal care. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to analyze trends in the prevalence of PVs based on age and FH in a consecutive cohort of patients referred for hereditary cancer testing (MyRisk, Myriad Genetics). We report model-based prevalence estimates for patients without FH diagnosed with BC, CRC, or EC at various ages. Prevalence is summarized overall for 25-48 hereditary cancer genes and for genes most frequently implicated in each cancer type. Results: Estimates of prevalence of PVs among patients with BC and CRC decreased substantially with age of diagnosis (Table 1). For patients with BC/CRC (respectively) without FH, overall prevalence estimates were 13.0%/11.8% among those diagnosed at age 30, 6.9%/7.1% at age 50 and 2.5%/3.2% at age 80. Among BC patients, PVs were most frequently identified in the BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 genes. Among CRC patients, PVs were most prevalent in the Lynch syndrome genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 . Prevalence was not significantly associated with age at EC diagnosis. Women with no FH had overall prevalence estimates of 7.5% if diagnosed with EC at age 30, 7.3% at age 50 and 7.1% at age 80 (Table 1). PVs were most common in the aforementioned Lynch syndrome genes. Conclusions: These results support existing literature that a substantial fraction of patients who do not meet guidelines for genetic testing may carry PVs, including a high prevalence of PVs among EC patients without FH, regardless of age at diagnosis. Elimination of age-based restrictions on genetic testing could improve the survival of cancer patients and their family members. Estimated prevalence (%) according to age of diagnosis among patients with no family history of cancer. Age at dx 30 40 50 60 70 80 BC 13.0% 9.5% 6.9% 5.0% 3.5% 2.5% CRC 11.8% 9.2% 7.1% 5.5% 4.2% 3.2% EC 7.5% 7.4% 7.3% 7.2% 7.2% 7.1% BC a 12.3% 8.3% 5.6% 3.7% 2.4% 1.6% CRC b 7.3% 5.1% 3.5% 2.4% 1.7% 1.1% EC b 4.4% 4.3% 4.3% 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% BC=breast cancer; CRC=colorectal cancer; dx=diagnosis; EC=endometrial cancer. a BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM, or PALB2. b MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of New Mexico (US), Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US), Myriad Genetics (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Myriad Genetics
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.