Better together: Synergy of germline and somatic testing in HRR pathway-driven cancers.

10571 Background: Germline and somatic pathogenic variants inform eligibility for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic (BOPP) cancers. The role of BRCA1/BRCA2 in BOPP cancers is well-established, but the significance of other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes is evolving. Integrating germline and somatic data provides a comprehensive understanding of oncogenesis and informs therapeutic decisions and risk assessment. For example, patients with “two hits” (germline and somatic alteration in the same HRR gene) often exhibit exceptional responses to PARPi. Methods: Patients with BOPP cancers receiving standard of care germline genetic testing (GGT) (Labcorp Genetics, formerly Invitae) and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) (Omniseq Insight, Labcorp) between 2021-2024 were analyzed. CGP data was queried to determine if the germline pathogenic variant (PGV) 1) was detected in the tumor, 2) had suggestive loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) with a variant allele fraction (VAF) of ≥ 0.6, 3) had a second hit in the same gene, or 4) had somatic mutation(s) in other HRR gene(s). These were compared between BRCA1/BRCA2 and other HRR PGVs using Fisher’s exact test with significance set at <0.05. Results: 607 patients with BOPP cancers underwent GGT and CGP; 57 (9.4%) had ≥ 1 PGV in an HRR gene. The PGV+ cohort was 51% White; mean age at GGT was 62 years (26-88). Breast cancer was the most common cancer (27), followed by ovarian (15), pancreatic (12) and prostate (4); 20 (35%) patients had a BRCA1/BRCA2 PGV and 37 (65%) patients had other HRR PGV, primarily CHEK2, ATM, PALB2 (Table). Most (88%) PGV were detected by CGP, with 100% of BRCA2 PGV identified. However, 8 (12%) of PGV+ patients would have been missed by CGP testing alone. VAF ≥ 0.6 and/or 2nd hits in the same gene were significantly more likely in those with BRCA1/2 PGV vs. other HRR. Rates of additional mutations in other HRR genes were not significantly different (p>0.05) between the groups (Table). Conclusions: BRCA1/2 PGV were frequently identified as suspected drivers of BOPP cancers compared to other HRR genes. However, one-third of patients with other HRR variants exhibited features suggestive of driving cancer pathogenesis. These findings may qualify indicated patients for targeted therapies or trials and highlight the synergistic value of combined germline and somatic testing. Tumor characteristics of patients with HRR PGV. Genes Total PGV+ patients N (%) PGV detected by CGP N (%) VAF ≥ 0.6 N (%) 2nd hit, same gene N (%) VAF ≥ 0.6 OR 2nd hit N (%) 2nd mutation, different HRR gene BRCA1/2 20 17 (85) 12 (71) a 2 (12) 14 (82) b 6 (35) BRCA1 11 8 (73) 7 (88) 0 (0) 7 (88) 2 (25) BRCA2 9 9 (100) 5 (56) 2 (22) 7 (78) 4 (44) Other HRR c 37 33 (89) 9 (27) a 4 (12) 11 (33) b 9 (27) a p=0.011; b p=0.005; c CHEK2 (14), ATM (7), PALB2 (5), BRIP1 (2), RAD51C (2); BARD1 , BLM, FANCA, FANCA/CHEK2, FANCM , NBN, RAD50 (1 each).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.10571
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Better together: Synergy of germline and somatic testing in HRR pathway-driven cancers.

Edward D. Esplin, Taylor J. Jensen, Emily M. Russell, Shakti Ramkissoon et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Better together: Synergy of germline and somatic testing in HRR pathway-driven cancers.

Edward D. Esplin, Taylor J. Jensen, Emily M. Russell, Shakti Ramkissoon, Eric A. Severson, Erin Newburn, Sarah M. Nielsen, Rebecca A. Previs, Heidi Ko, Kyle C. Strickland, Shumei Kato, Michelle Green
article en

Abstract

10571 Background: Germline and somatic pathogenic variants inform eligibility for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic (BOPP) cancers. The role of BRCA1/BRCA2 in BOPP cancers is well-established, but the significance of other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes is evolving. Integrating germline and somatic data provides a comprehensive understanding of oncogenesis and informs therapeutic decisions and risk assessment. For example, patients with “two hits” (germline and somatic alteration in the same HRR gene) often exhibit exceptional responses to PARPi. Methods: Patients with BOPP cancers receiving standard of care germline genetic testing (GGT) (Labcorp Genetics, formerly Invitae) and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) (Omniseq Insight, Labcorp) between 2021-2024 were analyzed. CGP data was queried to determine if the germline pathogenic variant (PGV) 1) was detected in the tumor, 2) had suggestive loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) with a variant allele fraction (VAF) of ≥ 0.6, 3) had a second hit in the same gene, or 4) had somatic mutation(s) in other HRR gene(s). These were compared between BRCA1/BRCA2 and other HRR PGVs using Fisher’s exact test with significance set at <0.05. Results: 607 patients with BOPP cancers underwent GGT and CGP; 57 (9.4%) had ≥ 1 PGV in an HRR gene. The PGV+ cohort was 51% White; mean age at GGT was 62 years (26-88). Breast cancer was the most common cancer (27), followed by ovarian (15), pancreatic (12) and prostate (4); 20 (35%) patients had a BRCA1/BRCA2 PGV and 37 (65%) patients had other HRR PGV, primarily CHEK2, ATM, PALB2 (Table). Most (88%) PGV were detected by CGP, with 100% of BRCA2 PGV identified. However, 8 (12%) of PGV+ patients would have been missed by CGP testing alone. VAF ≥ 0.6 and/or 2nd hits in the same gene were significantly more likely in those with BRCA1/2 PGV vs. other HRR. Rates of additional mutations in other HRR genes were not significantly different (p>0.05) between the groups (Table). Conclusions: BRCA1/2 PGV were frequently identified as suspected drivers of BOPP cancers compared to other HRR genes. However, one-third of patients with other HRR variants exhibited features suggestive of driving cancer pathogenesis. These findings may qualify indicated patients for targeted therapies or trials and highlight the synergistic value of combined germline and somatic testing. Tumor characteristics of patients with HRR PGV. Genes Total PGV+ patients N (%) PGV detected by CGP N (%) VAF ≥ 0.6 N (%) 2nd hit, same gene N (%) VAF ≥ 0.6 OR 2nd hit N (%) 2nd mutation, different HRR gene BRCA1/2 20 17 (85) 12 (71) a 2 (12) 14 (82) b 6 (35) BRCA1 11 8 (73) 7 (88) 0 (0) 7 (88) 2 (25) BRCA2 9 9 (100) 5 (56) 2 (22) 7 (78) 4 (44) Other HRR c 37 33 (89) 9 (27) a 4 (12) 11 (33) b 9 (27) a p=0.011; b p=0.005; c CHEK2 (14), ATM (7), PALB2 (5), BRIP1 (2), RAD51C (2); BARD1 , BLM, FANCA, FANCA/CHEK2, FANCM , NBN, RAD50 (1 each).

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
UC San Diego Health System (US), LabCorp (United States) (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Invitae (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.