Impact of trimodal therapy on survival outcomes in non-urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A nationwide analysis.

e16614 Background: Bladder-sparing strategies (BSS) are increasingly utilized in managing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), with trimodal therapy (TMT) comprising of maximum possible local resection along with Chemoradiation being the most established approach. While current guidelines recommend TMT for organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. It is also applied to non-organ confined disease. Furthermore, most evidence from retrospective studies and clinical trials focuses on urothelial histology. We aim to investigate the impact of TMT on overall survival (OS) in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients with MIBC (T2-4, N0-2, M0) having non urothelial histology. We utilized Kaplan Meier analysis and cox proportional hazard modelling to study the impact of various treatment modalities on OS in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Results: We identified a total of 3,298 patients with MIBC with non-urothelial histology. Among these, 2,240 (67.9%) received surgery with or without systemic therapy, and 1,058 (32.1%) were treated with TMT. The median OS was 48.2 months (95% CI: 40.54–54.24) for those who underwent surgery with or without Systemic therapy and 21.75 months (95% CI: 19.84–23.72) for those treated with TMT. In the multivariate analysis, higher hazard ratios (HRs) were observed for patients with non-academic facility treatment (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04–1.30, p < 0.01), Charlson comorbidity score ≥1 (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.38, p < 0.001), and TMT treatment (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, we found surgery with or without systemic therapy was associated with better survival compared to TMT in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. These findings warrant further investigation and emphasize the need for careful patient selection and consideration of risk factors when opting for bladder-preserving approaches in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Cox proportional hazards regression model in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Variable HR (95% CI) P-value Facility Type Academic Non-Academic Ref 1.16 (1.04–1.30) <0.01 Charlson Dayson Comorbidity score = 0 >= 1 Ref 1.24 (1.11–1.38) <0.001 Grade Well or moderately differentiated Poor or undifferentiated Ref 1.01 (0.90–1.13) 0.91 Treatment type Surgery +/- Systemic therapy TMT Ref 1.12 (1.08–1.16) <0.001

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16614
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of trimodal therapy on survival outcomes in non-urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A nationwide analysis.

Karan Jatwani, Rajiv Doddamani, Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani, Rohan Garje et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Impact of trimodal therapy on survival outcomes in non-urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A nationwide analysis.

Karan Jatwani, Rajiv Doddamani, Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani, Rohan Garje, Atulya Aman Khosla, Manas Pustake, Murugesan Manoharan
article en

Abstract

e16614 Background: Bladder-sparing strategies (BSS) are increasingly utilized in managing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), with trimodal therapy (TMT) comprising of maximum possible local resection along with Chemoradiation being the most established approach. While current guidelines recommend TMT for organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. It is also applied to non-organ confined disease. Furthermore, most evidence from retrospective studies and clinical trials focuses on urothelial histology. We aim to investigate the impact of TMT on overall survival (OS) in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients with MIBC (T2-4, N0-2, M0) having non urothelial histology. We utilized Kaplan Meier analysis and cox proportional hazard modelling to study the impact of various treatment modalities on OS in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Results: We identified a total of 3,298 patients with MIBC with non-urothelial histology. Among these, 2,240 (67.9%) received surgery with or without systemic therapy, and 1,058 (32.1%) were treated with TMT. The median OS was 48.2 months (95% CI: 40.54–54.24) for those who underwent surgery with or without Systemic therapy and 21.75 months (95% CI: 19.84–23.72) for those treated with TMT. In the multivariate analysis, higher hazard ratios (HRs) were observed for patients with non-academic facility treatment (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04–1.30, p < 0.01), Charlson comorbidity score ≥1 (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.38, p < 0.001), and TMT treatment (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, we found surgery with or without systemic therapy was associated with better survival compared to TMT in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. These findings warrant further investigation and emphasize the need for careful patient selection and consideration of risk factors when opting for bladder-preserving approaches in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Cox proportional hazards regression model in patients with non-urothelial MIBC. Variable HR (95% CI) P-value Facility Type Academic Non-Academic Ref 1.16 (1.04–1.30) <0.01 Charlson Dayson Comorbidity score = 0 >= 1 Ref 1.24 (1.11–1.38) <0.001 Grade Well or moderately differentiated Poor or undifferentiated Ref 1.01 (0.90–1.13) 0.91 Treatment type Surgery +/- Systemic therapy TMT Ref 1.12 (1.08–1.16) <0.001

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Texas Tech University (US), George Washington University Hospital (US), Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Baptist Health South Florida (US), Lakewood Regional Medical Center (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.