A phase 2, open-label, randomized study of livmoniplimab in combination with budigalimab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

TPS4618 Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) has a high mortality rate in patients (pts) with metastatic disease. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (CTx) or enfortumab vedotin (EV), have been approved for first-line treatment of metastatic (m)UC, many pts have de novo or develop acquired resistance. For pts without response to frontline treatment or whose disease has progressed on prior CPI combinations, optimal treatment is unclear and new therapies are urgently needed. Glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP) is a membrane-bound receptor that complexes with latent transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1; the release of active TGF-β1 from this complex suppresses antitumor responses. Livmoniplimab (livmo), an antibody targeting the GARP:TGF-β1 complex, prevents release of active TGF-β1, thereby promoting antitumor activity. A first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT03821935) demonstrated that combining livmo and the anti–PD-1 mAb budigalimab (budi) resulted in a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in pts with PD-1–refractory advanced UC (J Clin Oncol 2024;42[suppl 4]: abs 617). Herein, we describe the phase 2 study that is evaluating livmo + budi vs CTx in pts with mUC (NCT06632951). Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized study is enrolling pts aged ≥18 years who have mUC, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0–1, and have experienced disease progression on anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-1 ligand 1 therapy. Platinum (Pt)-eligible pts must have received a Pt-containing regimen; pts who can receive EV must have experienced disease progression on/after receiving EV treatment. Primary objectives are to identify the recommended phase 3 livmo dose in combination with budi and evaluate overall survival. Secondary objectives include evaluating progression-free survival, best overall response of complete or partial response, duration of response, and assessment of safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of the combination. Pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to 3 arms: 1) livmo dose 1 Q3W + budi Q3W; 2) livmo dose 2 Q3W + budi Q3W; or 3) investigator’s choice of CTx (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or gemcitabine). Pts will be stratified by ECOG PS (0 vs 1) and first-line therapy (pembrolizumab + EV vs CTx). Treatment for pts in Arms 1 and 2 will continue until a maximum of 35 cycles. For pts in Arm 3, treatment will continue for the duration that is consistent with local guidelines/practice for this pt population. No crossover between arms will be permitted. For all pts, treatment is discontinued at disease progression or if other protocol-defined discontinuation criteria are met. In total, approximately 150 pts (50 pts/arm) are planned for enrollment globally. Clinical trial information: NCT06632951 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.tps4618
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase 2, open-label, randomized study of livmoniplimab in combination with budigalimab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

J. Thaddeus Beck, Shingo Hatakeyama, Matthew D. Galsky, Eli Rosenbaum et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

A phase 2, open-label, randomized study of livmoniplimab in combination with budigalimab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

J. Thaddeus Beck, Shingo Hatakeyama, Matthew D. Galsky, Eli Rosenbaum, Nadine S. Jahchan, Duyen Ngo, Cathy Zhou, Cristiano Ferlini, Sujata Jha, Terence W. Friedlander, Avivit Peer
article en

Abstract

TPS4618 Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) has a high mortality rate in patients (pts) with metastatic disease. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (CTx) or enfortumab vedotin (EV), have been approved for first-line treatment of metastatic (m)UC, many pts have de novo or develop acquired resistance. For pts without response to frontline treatment or whose disease has progressed on prior CPI combinations, optimal treatment is unclear and new therapies are urgently needed. Glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP) is a membrane-bound receptor that complexes with latent transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1; the release of active TGF-β1 from this complex suppresses antitumor responses. Livmoniplimab (livmo), an antibody targeting the GARP:TGF-β1 complex, prevents release of active TGF-β1, thereby promoting antitumor activity. A first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT03821935) demonstrated that combining livmo and the anti–PD-1 mAb budigalimab (budi) resulted in a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in pts with PD-1–refractory advanced UC (J Clin Oncol 2024;42[suppl 4]: abs 617). Herein, we describe the phase 2 study that is evaluating livmo + budi vs CTx in pts with mUC (NCT06632951). Methods: This multicenter, open-label, randomized study is enrolling pts aged ≥18 years who have mUC, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0–1, and have experienced disease progression on anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-1 ligand 1 therapy. Platinum (Pt)-eligible pts must have received a Pt-containing regimen; pts who can receive EV must have experienced disease progression on/after receiving EV treatment. Primary objectives are to identify the recommended phase 3 livmo dose in combination with budi and evaluate overall survival. Secondary objectives include evaluating progression-free survival, best overall response of complete or partial response, duration of response, and assessment of safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of the combination. Pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to 3 arms: 1) livmo dose 1 Q3W + budi Q3W; 2) livmo dose 2 Q3W + budi Q3W; or 3) investigator’s choice of CTx (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or gemcitabine). Pts will be stratified by ECOG PS (0 vs 1) and first-line therapy (pembrolizumab + EV vs CTx). Treatment for pts in Arms 1 and 2 will continue until a maximum of 35 cycles. For pts in Arm 3, treatment will continue for the duration that is consistent with local guidelines/practice for this pt population. No crossover between arms will be permitted. For all pts, treatment is discontinued at disease progression or if other protocol-defined discontinuation criteria are met. In total, approximately 150 pts (50 pts/arm) are planned for enrollment globally. Clinical trial information: NCT06632951 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), AbbVie (United States) (US), Highlands Oncology Group (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US), Hirosaki University Hospital (JP), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
AbbVie
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.