The Vanguard study: An NCI cancer screening research network multi-cancer detection feasibility study.

e22522 Background: Multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests are promising; however, large-scale trials are needed to establish their harms, benefits, and clinical utility. The NCI has established the Cancer Screening Research Network (CSRN) to evaluate novel screening technologies. The first study of CSRN, the Vanguard study, is designed to establish the feasibility of recruiting individuals from diverse backgrounds into randomized cancer screening trials and to evaluate trial design and diagnostic evaluation processes. Methods: The Vanguard study is a randomized, three-arm trial of two novel MCD assays and a usual care group (n = 24,000). Adults ages 45-75 without cancer in the last 5 years will be eligible. The primary outcomes are feasibility and equitable recruitment. Recruitment sites include nine US Hubs (“ACCESS Hubs”) selected for ability to recruit racially, ethnically, geographically and socioeconomically diverse participants. Participants randomized to an intervention arm will receive an MCD test at baseline and year 1 follow-up. MCD platforms selected for investigation demonstrate ability to screen for lung, breast, colorectal, prostate, bladder, ovarian, pancreatic, esophageal, liver and gastric cancers. All participants will provide blood samples and complete questionnaires centered around demographics, social determinants of health, cancer risk and screening history, anxiety, and cancer worry, at baseline and year 1. Year 2 will include the same questionnaires without a blood sample. All participants will be encouraged to participate in standard-of-care (SOC) cancer screenings. Those with abnormal MCD results will undergo a cancer site-specific, protocol-guided diagnostic evaluation. will be followed for SOC screening behavior, cancer incidence, mortality, and quality of life. Results: The Vanguard study protocol, developed in partnership between the CSRN Communications and Coordinating Center, Statistics and Data Management Center, ACCESS Hubs, and the NCI, will be launched in 2025. ACCESS Hubs will accrue participants over a two-year period. Several unique design elements have been integrated into this study: 1) Facilitation of recruitment and retention of underrepresented and rural populations using features such as remote consenting, remote blood collection, electronic surveys. 2) Results of a positive MCD will always be returned to participants but participants in 4 Hubs will be blinded to whether they have undergone testing with an MCD. 3) Results of MCD testing will identify a likely tissue of origin (e.g., ovary or pancreas) to guide diagnostic workup. Conclusions: The Vanguard study is a critical step to ensure rigorous design and implementation of future large RCTs evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of MCDs. Results from this study will inform a larger RCT to evaluate whether MCDs are beneficial in detecting cancer early, and any potential harms of the tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e22522
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Vanguard study: An NCI cancer screening research network multi-cancer detection feasibility study.

Marie Wood, Rebecca Davidson Kaltman, Quyen Ngo‐Metzger, Katherine A. Guthrie et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
1.61
article

The Vanguard study: An NCI cancer screening research network multi-cancer detection feasibility study.

Marie Wood, Rebecca Davidson Kaltman, Quyen Ngo‐Metzger, Katherine A. Guthrie, Yikyung Park, Carrie B. Lee, Joseph C. Liao, Benjamin A. Rybicki, Scott David Ramsey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

e22522 Background: Multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests are promising; however, large-scale trials are needed to establish their harms, benefits, and clinical utility. The NCI has established the Cancer Screening Research Network (CSRN) to evaluate novel screening technologies. The first study of CSRN, the Vanguard study, is designed to establish the feasibility of recruiting individuals from diverse backgrounds into randomized cancer screening trials and to evaluate trial design and diagnostic evaluation processes. Methods: The Vanguard study is a randomized, three-arm trial of two novel MCD assays and a usual care group (n = 24,000). Adults ages 45-75 without cancer in the last 5 years will be eligible. The primary outcomes are feasibility and equitable recruitment. Recruitment sites include nine US Hubs (“ACCESS Hubs”) selected for ability to recruit racially, ethnically, geographically and socioeconomically diverse participants. Participants randomized to an intervention arm will receive an MCD test at baseline and year 1 follow-up. MCD platforms selected for investigation demonstrate ability to screen for lung, breast, colorectal, prostate, bladder, ovarian, pancreatic, esophageal, liver and gastric cancers. All participants will provide blood samples and complete questionnaires centered around demographics, social determinants of health, cancer risk and screening history, anxiety, and cancer worry, at baseline and year 1. Year 2 will include the same questionnaires without a blood sample. All participants will be encouraged to participate in standard-of-care (SOC) cancer screenings. Those with abnormal MCD results will undergo a cancer site-specific, protocol-guided diagnostic evaluation. will be followed for SOC screening behavior, cancer incidence, mortality, and quality of life. Results: The Vanguard study protocol, developed in partnership between the CSRN Communications and Coordinating Center, Statistics and Data Management Center, ACCESS Hubs, and the NCI, will be launched in 2025. ACCESS Hubs will accrue participants over a two-year period. Several unique design elements have been integrated into this study: 1) Facilitation of recruitment and retention of underrepresented and rural populations using features such as remote consenting, remote blood collection, electronic surveys. 2) Results of a positive MCD will always be returned to participants but participants in 4 Hubs will be blinded to whether they have undergone testing with an MCD. 3) Results of MCD testing will identify a likely tissue of origin (e.g., ovary or pancreas) to guide diagnostic workup. Conclusions: The Vanguard study is a critical step to ensure rigorous design and implementation of future large RCTs evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of MCDs. Results from this study will inform a larger RCT to evaluate whether MCDs are beneficial in detecting cancer early, and any potential harms of the tests.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Henry Ford Health System (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Virginia Cancer Institute (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.