A case-based learning program in medical oncology: A trainee-led feasibility study.

e21012 Background: Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for trainees across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in Medical Oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are frequently limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology department at a major cancer center in Australia. Methods: All eligible participants (4 fellows, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs) and 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Feasibility was assessed using 5 of Bowen's key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, and integration. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic and conversation analyses on qualitative data. Results: Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran as planned. Attendance rate was 66%, most absences being secondary to leave. Sessions averaged 61.4 minutes, with mean preparation time of 24.2 minutes per session. Perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with specialist attendance (9.7 vs 8.8, p=0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). The CBL program more than doubled the number of dedicated educational opportunities for participants. In addition, CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than other concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs 8.1, p<0.001). Coding of qualitative data identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a specialist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided practical learning opportunities. Conversation analysis supports that CBL is a positive, supportive, and collaborative way of learning that participants found valuable and enjoyable. Conclusions: A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in Medical Oncology can be feasible, well received, and an efficient educational model. It offers a promising complement to traditional specialist-led teaching in a rapidly evolving field where availability of specialist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centers, to the benefit of rural trainees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e21012
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A case-based learning program in medical oncology: A trainee-led feasibility study.

Fiona Day, Jonathon Vundum
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

A case-based learning program in medical oncology: A trainee-led feasibility study.

Fiona Day, Jonathon Vundum
article en

Abstract

e21012 Background: Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for trainees across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in Medical Oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are frequently limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology department at a major cancer center in Australia. Methods: All eligible participants (4 fellows, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs) and 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Feasibility was assessed using 5 of Bowen's key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, and integration. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic and conversation analyses on qualitative data. Results: Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran as planned. Attendance rate was 66%, most absences being secondary to leave. Sessions averaged 61.4 minutes, with mean preparation time of 24.2 minutes per session. Perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with specialist attendance (9.7 vs 8.8, p=0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). The CBL program more than doubled the number of dedicated educational opportunities for participants. In addition, CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than other concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs 8.1, p<0.001). Coding of qualitative data identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a specialist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided practical learning opportunities. Conversation analysis supports that CBL is a positive, supportive, and collaborative way of learning that participants found valuable and enjoyable. Conclusions: A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in Medical Oncology can be feasible, well received, and an efficient educational model. It offers a promising complement to traditional specialist-led teaching in a rapidly evolving field where availability of specialist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centers, to the benefit of rural trainees.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.