Leveraging stimulated Raman histology-based cellularity for random forest prediction of glioblastoma recurrence.

2010 Background: Glioblastoma is a universally fatal diagnosis with extent of resection being one of the most significant predictors of overall and progression-free survival. Most patients eventually experience recurrence, with sixty percent recurring along the resection cavity. Recent work leveraging Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) and artificial intelligence (AI) has approximated glioma cellularity within the infiltrative margins. It remains unknown if these estimates of glioma burden at the infiltrative margins influence glioblastoma recurrence. This study aims to evaluate a predictive model of focal recurrence in patients with glioblastoma using SRH and AI-generated cellularity scores from tissue samples taken at the resection cavity margins. Methods: A multi-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with glioblastoma who underwent resection followed by spatial annotated tissues acquired from the resection cavity margins. Tissues were analyzed using SRH optical imaging, and histopathology analysis was performed using confocal microscopy. Tissue cellularity was measured histologically and by optical imaging. Results: Over 400 patients and 2,200 specimens were analyzed, of which a nested subset of 60 patients were selected based on selection criteria. Using preoperative and postoperative imaging, margin samples were determined to be in an area of recurrence (n=58) or nonrecurrence (n=220). Cellularity was significantly higher in the recurrent margin sample group when compared to the nonrecurrent group (p = 0.026), which was further confirmed by a pathologist-determined cellularity score (0-3) that demonstrated similar findings (p = 0.026). Results were validated across three medical centers. Six classifiers were then trained for recurrence prediction. Using nineteen of the most predictive variables, random forests (RF) performed best with an AUC of 0.848. RF screening for the minimum practical number of variables demonstrated an AUC of 0.805 using only FastGlioma, age and extent of resection as variables. Conclusions: AI-generated cellularity scores have the potential to predict focal recurrence of glioblastoma, allowing for more tailored approaches to surgical resection and radiotherapy to increase progression-free survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.2010
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging stimulated Raman histology-based cellularity for random forest prediction of glioblastoma recurrence.

Akhil Kondepudi, Katie Scotford, Albert H. Kim, Thiébaud Picart et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
article

Leveraging stimulated Raman histology-based cellularity for random forest prediction of glioblastoma recurrence.

Akhil Kondepudi, Katie Scotford, Albert H. Kim, Thiébaud Picart, Shawn L. Hervey‐Jumper, Sanjeev Herr, Todd Charles Hollon, Melike Pekmezci, Jasleen Kaur, Vardhaan Sai Ambati, Youssef Sibih, Niels Olshausen, Anna-Katharina Meißner
article en

Abstract

2010 Background: Glioblastoma is a universally fatal diagnosis with extent of resection being one of the most significant predictors of overall and progression-free survival. Most patients eventually experience recurrence, with sixty percent recurring along the resection cavity. Recent work leveraging Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) and artificial intelligence (AI) has approximated glioma cellularity within the infiltrative margins. It remains unknown if these estimates of glioma burden at the infiltrative margins influence glioblastoma recurrence. This study aims to evaluate a predictive model of focal recurrence in patients with glioblastoma using SRH and AI-generated cellularity scores from tissue samples taken at the resection cavity margins. Methods: A multi-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with glioblastoma who underwent resection followed by spatial annotated tissues acquired from the resection cavity margins. Tissues were analyzed using SRH optical imaging, and histopathology analysis was performed using confocal microscopy. Tissue cellularity was measured histologically and by optical imaging. Results: Over 400 patients and 2,200 specimens were analyzed, of which a nested subset of 60 patients were selected based on selection criteria. Using preoperative and postoperative imaging, margin samples were determined to be in an area of recurrence (n=58) or nonrecurrence (n=220). Cellularity was significantly higher in the recurrent margin sample group when compared to the nonrecurrent group (p = 0.026), which was further confirmed by a pathologist-determined cellularity score (0-3) that demonstrated similar findings (p = 0.026). Results were validated across three medical centers. Six classifiers were then trained for recurrence prediction. Using nineteen of the most predictive variables, random forests (RF) performed best with an AUC of 0.848. RF screening for the minimum practical number of variables demonstrated an AUC of 0.805 using only FastGlioma, age and extent of resection as variables. Conclusions: AI-generated cellularity scores have the potential to predict focal recurrence of glioblastoma, allowing for more tailored approaches to surgical resection and radiotherapy to increase progression-free survival.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Cologne (DE), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Michigan (US), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.