Real-world outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations as first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

e16510 Background: The management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has evolved significantly with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, limited real-world data exist comparing the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N/I) with ICI plus TKI (IO/TKI) combinations. This study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and other efficacy parameters for these regimens in patients with mccRCC treated at tertiary care centers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with mccRCC treated with first-line N/I or IO/TKI between 2018 and 2022. Eligible patients had confirmed clear cell histology, were treatment-naïve, and received first-line ICIs. Patient demographics, IMDC risk groups, treatment regimens, and efficacy outcomes were analyzed. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors affecting outcomes. Results: A total of 99 patients were included, with 33 receiving N/I and 66 receiving IO/TKI. Patients in the IO/TKI group had a higher proportion of Furhman grade 3–4 tumors (47% vs. 30%) and prior nephrectomy (53% vs. 39%), while more patients in the N/I group presented with N1 disease (33% vs. 17%) and de novo metastatic disease (82% vs. 68%). Median PFS for the overall cohort was 16 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.4); PFS was significantly longer in the IO/TKI group (21.36 months, 95% CI: 13.08–29.63) compared to the N/I group (10.49 months, 95% CI: 1.60–19.29; p = 0.03). OS was not reached in either group, with 3-year OS rates of 57% (95% CI: 34–74%) for N/I and 67% (95% CI: 19–77%) for IO/TKI (p = 0.2). Multivariate analysis showed that IO/TKI use (p = 0.03) and lymphocyte-to-platelet (L/P) ratio > 6.14 (p = 0.003) were independently associated with improved PFS, while pure clear cell histology (p = 0.04), L/P ratio > 6.14 (p = 0.006), and absence of bone metastasis (p = 0.02) were associated with improved OS. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, IO/TKI combinations demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared to N/I, with comparable OS outcomes. The findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment selection based on patient characteristics, including disease presentation, risk stratification, and tumor features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16510
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations as first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Mohamed Aseafan, Mubarak M. Al-Mansour, Shouki Bazarbashi, Ali Mustafa Sheikh et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Real-world outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations as first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Mohamed Aseafan, Mubarak M. Al-Mansour, Shouki Bazarbashi, Ali Mustafa Sheikh, Tusneem Elhassan, Bassam Basulaiman, Mahmoud Abdelsatar Elshenawy, Faisal Azam
article en

Abstract

e16510 Background: The management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has evolved significantly with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, limited real-world data exist comparing the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N/I) with ICI plus TKI (IO/TKI) combinations. This study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and other efficacy parameters for these regimens in patients with mccRCC treated at tertiary care centers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with mccRCC treated with first-line N/I or IO/TKI between 2018 and 2022. Eligible patients had confirmed clear cell histology, were treatment-naïve, and received first-line ICIs. Patient demographics, IMDC risk groups, treatment regimens, and efficacy outcomes were analyzed. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors affecting outcomes. Results: A total of 99 patients were included, with 33 receiving N/I and 66 receiving IO/TKI. Patients in the IO/TKI group had a higher proportion of Furhman grade 3–4 tumors (47% vs. 30%) and prior nephrectomy (53% vs. 39%), while more patients in the N/I group presented with N1 disease (33% vs. 17%) and de novo metastatic disease (82% vs. 68%). Median PFS for the overall cohort was 16 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.4); PFS was significantly longer in the IO/TKI group (21.36 months, 95% CI: 13.08–29.63) compared to the N/I group (10.49 months, 95% CI: 1.60–19.29; p = 0.03). OS was not reached in either group, with 3-year OS rates of 57% (95% CI: 34–74%) for N/I and 67% (95% CI: 19–77%) for IO/TKI (p = 0.2). Multivariate analysis showed that IO/TKI use (p = 0.03) and lymphocyte-to-platelet (L/P) ratio > 6.14 (p = 0.003) were independently associated with improved PFS, while pure clear cell histology (p = 0.04), L/P ratio > 6.14 (p = 0.006), and absence of bone metastasis (p = 0.02) were associated with improved OS. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, IO/TKI combinations demonstrated significantly longer PFS compared to N/I, with comparable OS outcomes. The findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment selection based on patient characteristics, including disease presentation, risk stratification, and tumor features.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Alfaisal University (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Fahd Medical City (SA), King Fahad Specialist Hospital (SA), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), Security Forces Hospital (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.