Recurrence-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in resectable esophageal cancer: An individual patient data analysis of phase III RCTs.

4068 Background: Overall survival (OS) is regarded as the gold standard efficacy endpoint but requires long follow-up. This study aimed to determine the validity of recurrence-free survival (RFS) as a surrogate endpoint for OS in resectable esophageal cancer. Methods: A systematic review of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing perioperative treatments for resectable advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer was conducted. Individual patient data (IPD) were requested from all included trials. Surrogacy between RFS and OS was assessed at the individual level using the Kendall rank correlation coefficient ( τ ) and at the trial level using the coefficient of determination ( R² ) from a meta-regression model. A τ of 0.8 and an R² of 0.65 were considered thresholds indicative of a good surrogate endpoint. Results: Twenty-two eligible trials were identified by the systematic review, and IPD were available from 10 RCTs (JCOG1109, JCOG9907, JCOG9204, FFCD9901, FFCD9102, SAKK75/08, CROSS, KOK, NeoRes2 and CMISG1701), including 2,145 patients who underwent R0 resection (cStage IV, cT1N0 and cT4b excluded). Of these, 1563 patients had squamous cell carcinoma, and 575 patients had adenocarcinoma. The 5-year OS and RFS rates were 53.2% and 46.2%, respectively, with a median OS of 6.2 years and a median RFS of 3.6 years. For individual-level surrogacy, Kendall’s τ was 0.823 (95% CI: 0.807–0.839). Subgroup analysis based on treatment modality revealed τ values of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.800–0.861) for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC; n = 586), 0.827 (95% CI: 0.803–0.850) for those receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT; n = 982), 0.770 (95% CI: 0.713–0.828) for the surgery-alone group (n = 320), and 0.861 (95% CI: 0.824–0.898) for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (n = 257). Trial-level surrogacy analysis across all 22 trials demonstrated an R 2 of 0.735 (95% CI: 0.512–0.939). The surrogate threshold effect was 0.929, indicating the minimum RFS treatment effect required to predict a nonzero effect on OS. Conclusions: This study demonstrated strong individual-level and trial-level surrogacy between RFS and OS in surgically resectable esophageal cancer across all perioperative treatment modalities. These findings hold promise for expediting the development of novel perioperative treatment by shortening the follow-up of clinical trials on esophageal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4068
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recurrence-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in resectable esophageal cancer: An individual patient data analysis of phase III RCTs.

Thomas Ruhstaller, Yuko Kitagawa, Yasunori Sato, Guillaume Piessen et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Recurrence-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in resectable esophageal cancer: An individual patient data analysis of phase III RCTs.

Thomas Ruhstaller, Yuko Kitagawa, Yasunori Sato, Guillaume Piessen, Bianca Mostert, Kengo Nagashima, Charlène J. van der Zijden, Hiroya Takeuchi, Shaoyuan Zhang, Thomas Aparicio, Jun Okui, Fredrik Klevebro, Satoru Matsuda, Peter Thuss‐Patience, Lijie Tan, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Takahiro Tsushima, Magnus Nilsson, Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, Ken Kato
article en

Abstract

4068 Background: Overall survival (OS) is regarded as the gold standard efficacy endpoint but requires long follow-up. This study aimed to determine the validity of recurrence-free survival (RFS) as a surrogate endpoint for OS in resectable esophageal cancer. Methods: A systematic review of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing perioperative treatments for resectable advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer was conducted. Individual patient data (IPD) were requested from all included trials. Surrogacy between RFS and OS was assessed at the individual level using the Kendall rank correlation coefficient ( τ ) and at the trial level using the coefficient of determination ( R² ) from a meta-regression model. A τ of 0.8 and an R² of 0.65 were considered thresholds indicative of a good surrogate endpoint. Results: Twenty-two eligible trials were identified by the systematic review, and IPD were available from 10 RCTs (JCOG1109, JCOG9907, JCOG9204, FFCD9901, FFCD9102, SAKK75/08, CROSS, KOK, NeoRes2 and CMISG1701), including 2,145 patients who underwent R0 resection (cStage IV, cT1N0 and cT4b excluded). Of these, 1563 patients had squamous cell carcinoma, and 575 patients had adenocarcinoma. The 5-year OS and RFS rates were 53.2% and 46.2%, respectively, with a median OS of 6.2 years and a median RFS of 3.6 years. For individual-level surrogacy, Kendall’s τ was 0.823 (95% CI: 0.807–0.839). Subgroup analysis based on treatment modality revealed τ values of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.800–0.861) for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC; n = 586), 0.827 (95% CI: 0.803–0.850) for those receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT; n = 982), 0.770 (95% CI: 0.713–0.828) for the surgery-alone group (n = 320), and 0.861 (95% CI: 0.824–0.898) for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (n = 257). Trial-level surrogacy analysis across all 22 trials demonstrated an R 2 of 0.735 (95% CI: 0.512–0.939). The surrogate threshold effect was 0.929, indicating the minimum RFS treatment effect required to predict a nonzero effect on OS. Conclusions: This study demonstrated strong individual-level and trial-level surrogacy between RFS and OS in surgically resectable esophageal cancer across all perioperative treatment modalities. These findings hold promise for expediting the development of novel perioperative treatment by shortening the follow-up of clinical trials on esophageal cancer.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Inserm (FR), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Keio University (JP), Université de Lille (FR), Fudan University (CN), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Keio University Hospital (JP), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Swiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research (CH), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), CANTHER - Hétérogénéité, Plasticité et Résistance aux Thérapies des Cancers (FR), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.