Evaluating the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis.

e16475 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, primarily driven by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Imatinib has transformed GIST treatment; however, resistance typically emerges within 20–24 months, necessitating effective second-line therapies such as sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, and masitinib. Methods: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 17 studies including 2,422 patients evaluated the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and other targeted therapies for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in imatinib-resistant GIST. Mean differences (MDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated, and treatments were ranked using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values. Control was used as the reference in all comparisons. Results: For PFS, masitinib showed the most significant improvement (MD: 11.78 months, 95% CrI: 0.29–23.49; SUCRA: 86.52%), followed by regorafenib (MD: 9.33 months, 95% CrI: 4.15–14.88; SUCRA: 79.7%) and sunitinib (MD: 8.68 months, 95% CrI: 3.47–14.13; SUCRA: 74.71%). In OS, masitinib ranked highest (MD: 34.09 months, 95% CrI: -20.64 to 90.13; SUCRA: 83.56%), followed by regorafenib (MD: 27.35 months, 95% CrI: -35.13 to 90.22; SUCRA: 76.96%) and sunitinib (MD: 17.16 months, 95% CrI: -9.66 to 44.89; SUCRA: 69.96%). Regorafenib led in ORR (RR: 8.23, 95% CrI: 0.68–97.04; SUCRA: 76.36%), followed by ripretinib (RR: 5.53, 95% CrI: 0.42–104.01; SUCRA: 63.91%) and sunitinib (RR: 4.56, 95% CrI: 0.66–40.67; SUCRA: 58.12%). Conclusions: Masitinib and regorafenib demonstrate the most promising efficacy for improving survival and treatment response in imatinib-resistant GIST patients. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored therapeutic strategies for advanced GIST management. Outcome Treatment Mean Difference / Relative Risk (95% CrI) SUCRA (%) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Months) Control Reference 26.00 Masitinib 11.78 (0.29 to 23.49) 86.52 Regorafenib 9.33 (4.15 to 14.88) 79.70 Sunitinib 8.68 (3.47 to 14.13) 74.71 Ripretinib 7.72 (0.04 to 15.50) 68.65 Sorafenib 3.10 (-8.19 to 13.73) 44.13 Pimitespib 2.33 (-7.75 to 12.46) 40.13 Overall Survival (OS) (Months) Control Reference 38.51 Masitinib 34.09 (-20.64 to 90.13) 83.56 Regorafenib 27.35 (-35.13 to 90.22) 76.96 Sunitinib 17.16 (-9.66 to 44.89) 69.96 Ripretinib 6.65 (-35.54 to 49.47) 50.83 Objective Response Rate (Relative Risk) Control Reference 15.94 Regorafenib 8.23 (0.68 to 97.04) 76.36 Ripretinib 5.53 (0.42 to 104.01) 63.91 Sunitinib 4.56 (0.66 to 40.67) 58.12 Sorafenib</jats:

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16475
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Debabrata Biswas, Anil A. Joy, Md. Imran Hossain, Umme Kulsum et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Evaluating the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Debabrata Biswas, Anil A. Joy, Md. Imran Hossain, Umme Kulsum, Sajjad Ghanim Al‐Badri, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md Abu Sayed, Manisha Das, Mansur Habib, Durjoy Acharjee, Ibrahim Khalil, Shaila Saaki, Sakabe Tarannum, Irfat Islam Eva, Sunjida Amin Promi
article en

Abstract

e16475 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, primarily driven by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Imatinib has transformed GIST treatment; however, resistance typically emerges within 20–24 months, necessitating effective second-line therapies such as sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, and masitinib. Methods: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 17 studies including 2,422 patients evaluated the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and other targeted therapies for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in imatinib-resistant GIST. Mean differences (MDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated, and treatments were ranked using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values. Control was used as the reference in all comparisons. Results: For PFS, masitinib showed the most significant improvement (MD: 11.78 months, 95% CrI: 0.29–23.49; SUCRA: 86.52%), followed by regorafenib (MD: 9.33 months, 95% CrI: 4.15–14.88; SUCRA: 79.7%) and sunitinib (MD: 8.68 months, 95% CrI: 3.47–14.13; SUCRA: 74.71%). In OS, masitinib ranked highest (MD: 34.09 months, 95% CrI: -20.64 to 90.13; SUCRA: 83.56%), followed by regorafenib (MD: 27.35 months, 95% CrI: -35.13 to 90.22; SUCRA: 76.96%) and sunitinib (MD: 17.16 months, 95% CrI: -9.66 to 44.89; SUCRA: 69.96%). Regorafenib led in ORR (RR: 8.23, 95% CrI: 0.68–97.04; SUCRA: 76.36%), followed by ripretinib (RR: 5.53, 95% CrI: 0.42–104.01; SUCRA: 63.91%) and sunitinib (RR: 4.56, 95% CrI: 0.66–40.67; SUCRA: 58.12%). Conclusions: Masitinib and regorafenib demonstrate the most promising efficacy for improving survival and treatment response in imatinib-resistant GIST patients. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored therapeutic strategies for advanced GIST management. Outcome Treatment Mean Difference / Relative Risk (95% CrI) SUCRA (%) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Months) Control Reference 26.00 Masitinib 11.78 (0.29 to 23.49) 86.52 Regorafenib 9.33 (4.15 to 14.88) 79.70 Sunitinib 8.68 (3.47 to 14.13) 74.71 Ripretinib 7.72 (0.04 to 15.50) 68.65 Sorafenib 3.10 (-8.19 to 13.73) 44.13 Pimitespib 2.33 (-7.75 to 12.46) 40.13 Overall Survival (OS) (Months) Control Reference 38.51 Masitinib 34.09 (-20.64 to 90.13) 83.56 Regorafenib 27.35 (-35.13 to 90.22) 76.96 Sunitinib 17.16 (-9.66 to 44.89) 69.96 Ripretinib 6.65 (-35.54 to 49.47) 50.83 Objective Response Rate (Relative Risk) Control Reference 15.94 Regorafenib 8.23 (0.68 to 97.04) 76.36 Ripretinib 5.53 (0.42 to 104.01) 63.91 Sunitinib 4.56 (0.66 to 40.67) 58.12 Sorafenib</jats:

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Baghdad (IQ), Chittagong Medical College (BD), Comilla Medical College (BD), Dinajpur Medical College (BD), Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College (BD), Rangpur Medical College, Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.