Comparison outcome of transarterial chemoembolization combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

4141 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a promising first-line treatment option. Methods: We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and adverse events between the TACE-ICI-Len group (n=160) and the TACE-ICI-Bev group (n=216) as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to minimize bias. Efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Results: The TACE-ICI-Bev group demonstrated significantly improved OS and PFS compared to the TACE-ICI-Len group, especially across BCLC-B and BCLC-C stages (Total: mOS 22.8 vs. 15.4 months, p&lt;0.001; mPFS 12.4 vs. 8.3 months, p&lt;0.001; BCLC-B: mOS 23.3 vs. 16.6 months, p=0.005; mPFS 14.0 vs. 8.2 months, p&lt;0.0001; BCLC-C: mOS 22.3 vs. 15.1 months, p=0.002; mPFS 11.0 vs. 8.0 months, p&lt;0.001). Within the TACE-Bev-Ate subgroup, OS and PFS were further enhanced (Total: mOS 26.3 months; mPFS 13.8 months; BCLC-B: mOS 27.7 months; mPFS 16.7 months; BCLC-C: mOS 24.2 months; mPFS 12.6 months). The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) was significantly higher in the TACE-ICI-Bev group compared to the TACE-ICI-Len group (13.8% vs. 6.2%, p&lt;0.001). Notably, GB was significantly more frequent in patients with portal hypertension (PHT) compared to those without, in both the TACE-ICI-Bev group (30.9% vs. 6.6%, p&lt;0.001) and the TACE-ICI-Len group (20.2% vs. 0%, p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: TACE-ICI-Bev demonstrated superior OS and PFS compared to TACE-ICI-Len as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, with an acceptable safety. Management of PHT in patients with advanced HCC is critical to optimizing patient outcomes. Patient baseline characteristics before and after applying IPTW. Before IPTW After IPTW Variable TACE-ICI-Bev TACE-ICI-Len p TACE-ICI-Bev TACE-ICI-Len p n N=216 N=160 N=223.64 N=153.48 Age (mean (SD)) 59.21 (9.81) 57.19 (10.81) 0.059 57.59 (10.00) 57.23 (10.42) 0.780 Sex (%) 0.358 0.784 Female 37 (17.1) 21 (13.1) 33.1 (14.8) 24.6 (16.0) Male 179 (82.9) 139 (86.9) 190.6 (85.2) 128.9 (84.0) Hypertension (%) 0.46 0.928 No 152 (70.4) 106 (66.2) 150.8 (67.4) 104.3 (67.9) Yes 64 (29.6) 54 (33.8) 72.9 (32.6) 49.2 (32.1) DM (%) 0.176 0.981 <j

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.4141
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison outcome of transarterial chemoembolization combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ming Luo, Shuwen Zhang, Yawei Du, Yuexi Yu et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Comparison outcome of transarterial chemoembolization combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ming Luo, Shuwen Zhang, Yawei Du, Yuexi Yu, Ningning Zhang, Wei Zhang, Qiang Wu, Kaipeng Liu, Xuanchen Liu, Jihui Hao, Wei Bai, Yu Hao
article en

Abstract

4141 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a promising first-line treatment option. Methods: We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and adverse events between the TACE-ICI-Len group (n=160) and the TACE-ICI-Bev group (n=216) as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to minimize bias. Efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Results: The TACE-ICI-Bev group demonstrated significantly improved OS and PFS compared to the TACE-ICI-Len group, especially across BCLC-B and BCLC-C stages (Total: mOS 22.8 vs. 15.4 months, p&lt;0.001; mPFS 12.4 vs. 8.3 months, p&lt;0.001; BCLC-B: mOS 23.3 vs. 16.6 months, p=0.005; mPFS 14.0 vs. 8.2 months, p&lt;0.0001; BCLC-C: mOS 22.3 vs. 15.1 months, p=0.002; mPFS 11.0 vs. 8.0 months, p&lt;0.001). Within the TACE-Bev-Ate subgroup, OS and PFS were further enhanced (Total: mOS 26.3 months; mPFS 13.8 months; BCLC-B: mOS 27.7 months; mPFS 16.7 months; BCLC-C: mOS 24.2 months; mPFS 12.6 months). The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) was significantly higher in the TACE-ICI-Bev group compared to the TACE-ICI-Len group (13.8% vs. 6.2%, p&lt;0.001). Notably, GB was significantly more frequent in patients with portal hypertension (PHT) compared to those without, in both the TACE-ICI-Bev group (30.9% vs. 6.6%, p&lt;0.001) and the TACE-ICI-Len group (20.2% vs. 0%, p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: TACE-ICI-Bev demonstrated superior OS and PFS compared to TACE-ICI-Len as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, with an acceptable safety. Management of PHT in patients with advanced HCC is critical to optimizing patient outcomes. Patient baseline characteristics before and after applying IPTW. Before IPTW After IPTW Variable TACE-ICI-Bev TACE-ICI-Len p TACE-ICI-Bev TACE-ICI-Len p n N=216 N=160 N=223.64 N=153.48 Age (mean (SD)) 59.21 (9.81) 57.19 (10.81) 0.059 57.59 (10.00) 57.23 (10.42) 0.780 Sex (%) 0.358 0.784 Female 37 (17.1) 21 (13.1) 33.1 (14.8) 24.6 (16.0) Male 179 (82.9) 139 (86.9) 190.6 (85.2) 128.9 (84.0) Hypertension (%) 0.46 0.928 No 152 (70.4) 106 (66.2) 150.8 (67.4) 104.3 (67.9) Yes 64 (29.6) 54 (33.8) 72.9 (32.6) 49.2 (32.1) DM (%) 0.176 0.981 <j

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Xijing Hospital (CN), Air Force Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.