An experiment on earthquake size distribution estimations reveals unexpected large epistemic uncertainty across methods

SUMMARY The earthquake size distribution is well described by the Gutenberg Richter Law, controlled by the b-value parameter. In recent decades, a great variety of methods for estimating the b-value have been proposed by the scientific community, despite the simplicity of this relationship. All these methods underlie the different views of individual modellers and, therefore, often generate inconsistent results. In this study, we perform a seismological experiment in which we compare different, commonly adopted, methodologies, to estimate the completeness magnitude and the b-value, for seismicity in Central Italy. The intermethod differences are on average equal to 0.4 and 0.3, for Mc and b, respectively, but reach much larger values, especially during more intense seismic activity. This shows that epistemic uncertainty in the b-value plays a more crucial role than intramethod uncertainties, opening new perspectives in the interpretation of discrepant, single studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf193
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An experiment on earthquake size distribution estimations reveals unexpected large epistemic uncertainty across methods

Anna Maria Lombardi, Vincenzo Convertito, Caterina Montuori, Barbara Lolli et al.
Geophysical Journal International
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

An experiment on earthquake size distribution estimations reveals unexpected large epistemic uncertainty across methods

Anna Maria Lombardi, Vincenzo Convertito, Caterina Montuori, Barbara Lolli, Rodolfo Console, Licia Faenza, Giuseppe Falcone, Maura Murru, Francesco Pio Lucente, C. Godano, Pasquale De Gori, Ilaria Spassiani, Gianfranco Vannucci, Matteo Taroni, Laura Sandri, Paolo Gasperini, Emanuele Biondini, Anna Tramelli, Laura Gulia, Alexander García-Aristizábal
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY The earthquake size distribution is well described by the Gutenberg Richter Law, controlled by the b-value parameter. In recent decades, a great variety of methods for estimating the b-value have been proposed by the scientific community, despite the simplicity of this relationship. All these methods underlie the different views of individual modellers and, therefore, often generate inconsistent results. In this study, we perform a seismological experiment in which we compare different, commonly adopted, methodologies, to estimate the completeness magnitude and the b-value, for seismicity in Central Italy. The intermethod differences are on average equal to 0.4 and 0.3, for Mc and b, respectively, but reach much larger values, especially during more intense seismic activity. This shows that epistemic uncertainty in the b-value plays a more crucial role than intramethod uncertainties, opening new perspectives in the interpretation of discrepant, single studies.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 242(2)
Mediterranean University (ME), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Institute of Seismology (KZ), Swiss Finance Institute (CH), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.