The potential of disitamab vedotin in bladder preservation during neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer: A comparative analysis with the GC regimen.

e16585 Background: The goal of neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer is to improve pathological outcomes and provide patients with the opportunity to preserve the bladder. Disitamab Vedotin, a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has shown significant efficacy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. This study aims to evaluate the potential of Disitamab Vedotin in promoting bladder preservation during neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 44 bladder cancer patients was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (Disitamab Vedotin monotherapy or combined with immunotherapy, n = 21) and Group B (GC regimen, n = 23). The primary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, bladder preservation rate, and adverse events. Results: The CR rate in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B (76.2% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.017). The bladder preservation rate was also higher in Group A (66.7% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.069). Group A had a lower incidence of hematologic toxicities, including leukopenia (38.1% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.032) and neutropenia (19.0% vs. 52.2%, P = 0.031). Other adverse events, such as hepatotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy, showed no significant differences between the two groups. Severe adverse events (Grade 3–4) were rare, indicating good tolerability for both regimens. Conclusions: The Disitamab Vedotin regimen demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared to the GC regimen in neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer. Its higher CR rate and potential for bladder preservation make it a promising option for organ-sparing treatment. However, given the small sample size and the retrospective nature of this study, further validation through large-scale, multicenter prospective studies is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16585
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The potential of disitamab vedotin in bladder preservation during neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer: A comparative analysis with the GC regimen.

Kaikai Chen, Haibo Shen, Shenggen Yu, Jing Li et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

The potential of disitamab vedotin in bladder preservation during neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer: A comparative analysis with the GC regimen.

Kaikai Chen, Haibo Shen, Shenggen Yu, Jing Li, Shun Zhang, Yu Shen, Ding Xu, Hailong Liu, Zhiwei Chen
article en

Abstract

e16585 Background: The goal of neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer is to improve pathological outcomes and provide patients with the opportunity to preserve the bladder. Disitamab Vedotin, a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has shown significant efficacy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. This study aims to evaluate the potential of Disitamab Vedotin in promoting bladder preservation during neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 44 bladder cancer patients was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (Disitamab Vedotin monotherapy or combined with immunotherapy, n = 21) and Group B (GC regimen, n = 23). The primary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, bladder preservation rate, and adverse events. Results: The CR rate in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B (76.2% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.017). The bladder preservation rate was also higher in Group A (66.7% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.069). Group A had a lower incidence of hematologic toxicities, including leukopenia (38.1% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.032) and neutropenia (19.0% vs. 52.2%, P = 0.031). Other adverse events, such as hepatotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy, showed no significant differences between the two groups. Severe adverse events (Grade 3–4) were rare, indicating good tolerability for both regimens. Conclusions: The Disitamab Vedotin regimen demonstrated better efficacy and safety compared to the GC regimen in neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer. Its higher CR rate and potential for bladder preservation make it a promising option for organ-sparing treatment. However, given the small sample size and the retrospective nature of this study, further validation through large-scale, multicenter prospective studies is required.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), XinHua Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.