Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis of red, processed, and total meat intake.

e22508 Background: Red and processed meats have long been implicated as dietary risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, limited attention has been given to the distinct effects of different meat types, including red, processed, and total meat, on the risk of CRC and its subtypes, colon and rectal cancers. This gap in knowledge underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the relationship between meat consumption and cancer risk. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies was conducted to evaluate the association between red, processed, and total meat consumption and risks of colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers. Studies published from 1990 to November 1, 2024, were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted for each study and pooled using a random-effects model to account for variability among studies. Statistical evaluation was executed using the online platform MetaAnalysisOnline.com. Results: Data from 71 cohorts on red meat, 55 cohorts on processed meat, and 48 cohorts on total meat consumption were analyzed. For red meat consumption, the hazard ratios (HR) were 1.22 (95% CI: 1.15–1.30) for colon cancer, 1.15 (95% CI: 1.10–1.21) for colorectal cancer, and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07–1.39) for rectal cancer. For processed meat consumption, the HRs were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.07–1.20) for colon cancer, 1.21 (95% CI: 1.14–1.28) for colorectal cancer, and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.05–1.30) for rectal cancer. Similarly, total meat consumption was associated with HRs of 1.22 (95% CI: 1.11–1.35) for colon cancer, 1.17 (95% CI: 1.12–1.22) for colorectal cancer, and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.10–1.48) for rectal cancer. Moderate heterogeneity (I² ≤ 33%) was observed across studies. Conclusions: Different types of meat, including red, processed, and total meat, significantly increase the risks of colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers. These findings emphasize the common carcinogenic effects of various meat types and support dietary recommendations to limit meat consumption for cancer prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e22508
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis of red, processed, and total meat intake.

János Tibor Fekete, Balázs Győrffy, Mónika Fekete, Otília Menyhárt et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis of red, processed, and total meat intake.

János Tibor Fekete, Balázs Győrffy, Mónika Fekete, Otília Menyhárt, Gyöngyi Munkácsy, Andrea Lehoczki
article en

Abstract

e22508 Background: Red and processed meats have long been implicated as dietary risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, limited attention has been given to the distinct effects of different meat types, including red, processed, and total meat, on the risk of CRC and its subtypes, colon and rectal cancers. This gap in knowledge underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the relationship between meat consumption and cancer risk. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies was conducted to evaluate the association between red, processed, and total meat consumption and risks of colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers. Studies published from 1990 to November 1, 2024, were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted for each study and pooled using a random-effects model to account for variability among studies. Statistical evaluation was executed using the online platform MetaAnalysisOnline.com. Results: Data from 71 cohorts on red meat, 55 cohorts on processed meat, and 48 cohorts on total meat consumption were analyzed. For red meat consumption, the hazard ratios (HR) were 1.22 (95% CI: 1.15–1.30) for colon cancer, 1.15 (95% CI: 1.10–1.21) for colorectal cancer, and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07–1.39) for rectal cancer. For processed meat consumption, the HRs were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.07–1.20) for colon cancer, 1.21 (95% CI: 1.14–1.28) for colorectal cancer, and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.05–1.30) for rectal cancer. Similarly, total meat consumption was associated with HRs of 1.22 (95% CI: 1.11–1.35) for colon cancer, 1.17 (95% CI: 1.12–1.22) for colorectal cancer, and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.10–1.48) for rectal cancer. Moderate heterogeneity (I² ≤ 33%) was observed across studies. Conclusions: Different types of meat, including red, processed, and total meat, significantly increase the risks of colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers. These findings emphasize the common carcinogenic effects of various meat types and support dietary recommendations to limit meat consumption for cancer prevention.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Semmelweis University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.