Impact of COVID-19 infection on CAR-T therapy outcomes.

e23329 Background: CAR T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies, offering a highly effective immunotherapy option. However, CAR T-cell recipients are immunocompromised, which may increase their susceptibility to severe outcomes from COVID-19. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 in this population is crucial for optimizing clinical management. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes between CAR T-cell patients with and without COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a real-world global database to identify all patients who received CAR T-cell therapy over the past 10 years. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on COVID-19 status and propensity score matched (1:1) for age, race, and comorbidities. Outcomes, including mortality, cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, secondary malignancies, and hospital readmission rates, were assessed over a 30-day follow-up period. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare outcomes between cohorts. Results: Our study included a total of 3,141 patients, divided into 2,545 CP and 596 CN CAR T-cell therapy recipients. After PSM, 594 patients from each group were compared. The mean age of the CP group was 35.5 ± 20.5 years, significantly younger than the CN group at 49.5 ± 9.3 years (p = 0.065). BMI was nearly identical between the groups (27.9 ± 6.5 vs. 27.9 ± 6.1, p = 0.991). Both cohorts had similar rates of essential hypertension (43.8%), diabetes mellitus (17.0%), and malnutrition (~18%). In terms of outcomes, mortality was higher in the CP group (RR = 1.5, 95% CI: -0.008 to 0.02) compared to the CN group, though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.31). Readmission rates were comparable between the groups (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.02, p = 0.75). Significant findings included higher rates of cardiac arrest (1.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.001), new heart failure (RR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.10-4.25, p = 0.021), and acute kidney injury (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.95-2.23, p = 0.084) in CP patients. These results emphasize the increased burden of complications in CP CAR T-cell recipients, underscoring the need for close monitoring and tailored management in this high-risk population. Conclusions: COVID-positive patients experienced higher rates of cardiac arrest, new heart failure, acute kidney injury, and mortality compared to COVID-negative patients, despite similar baseline characteristics. These findings underscore the need for vigilant monitoring, preventive strategies, and tailored care to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 in this vulnerable population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e23329
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of COVID-19 infection on CAR-T therapy outcomes.

Abid Nawaz Khan Adil, Imran Mahmood Khan, Muhammad Atif Khan, Faiza Humayun Khan et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Impact of COVID-19 infection on CAR-T therapy outcomes.

Abid Nawaz Khan Adil, Imran Mahmood Khan, Muhammad Atif Khan, Faiza Humayun Khan, Abat Khan, Muhammad Ishaq, Abdul Wali Khan
article en

Abstract

e23329 Background: CAR T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies, offering a highly effective immunotherapy option. However, CAR T-cell recipients are immunocompromised, which may increase their susceptibility to severe outcomes from COVID-19. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 in this population is crucial for optimizing clinical management. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes between CAR T-cell patients with and without COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a real-world global database to identify all patients who received CAR T-cell therapy over the past 10 years. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on COVID-19 status and propensity score matched (1:1) for age, race, and comorbidities. Outcomes, including mortality, cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, secondary malignancies, and hospital readmission rates, were assessed over a 30-day follow-up period. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare outcomes between cohorts. Results: Our study included a total of 3,141 patients, divided into 2,545 CP and 596 CN CAR T-cell therapy recipients. After PSM, 594 patients from each group were compared. The mean age of the CP group was 35.5 ± 20.5 years, significantly younger than the CN group at 49.5 ± 9.3 years (p = 0.065). BMI was nearly identical between the groups (27.9 ± 6.5 vs. 27.9 ± 6.1, p = 0.991). Both cohorts had similar rates of essential hypertension (43.8%), diabetes mellitus (17.0%), and malnutrition (~18%). In terms of outcomes, mortality was higher in the CP group (RR = 1.5, 95% CI: -0.008 to 0.02) compared to the CN group, though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.31). Readmission rates were comparable between the groups (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.02, p = 0.75). Significant findings included higher rates of cardiac arrest (1.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.001), new heart failure (RR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.10-4.25, p = 0.021), and acute kidney injury (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.95-2.23, p = 0.084) in CP patients. These results emphasize the increased burden of complications in CP CAR T-cell recipients, underscoring the need for close monitoring and tailored management in this high-risk population. Conclusions: COVID-positive patients experienced higher rates of cardiac arrest, new heart failure, acute kidney injury, and mortality compared to COVID-negative patients, despite similar baseline characteristics. These findings underscore the need for vigilant monitoring, preventive strategies, and tailored care to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 in this vulnerable population.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Woodhull Medical and Mental Health Center (US), Community Regional Medical Center (US), Unity Health System (US), Memorial Healthcare System (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Unity Hospital (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.