Post-hoc analysis evaluating selinexor maintenance therapy in patients with <i>TP53</i> wt endometrial cancer: Progression-free survival by clinical factors in the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study.

5608 Background: At primary analysis of the phase 3 study of selinexor (SEL) maintenance treatment in patients (pts) with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC), improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) for the intent-to-treat population was not clinically meaningful. However, a promising efficacy signal was seen in a pre-specified exploratory analysis of TP53 wt EC. We present further exploratory PFS analyses of long-term follow-up data in TP53 wt EC. Methods: ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO (NCT03555422) was a double-blind randomized (2:1) study evaluating SEL vs placebo as maintenance treatment in pts with advanced/recurrent EC following response to prior systemic therapy. Post-hoc exploratory subgroup analyses include response to prior systemic chemotherapy, disease at time of prior systemic therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, histopathological subtype at initial diagnosis, and duration of last systemic therapy. Additional subgroups will be reported at the time of presentation. Results: Of 263 pts in the study, 113 (43.0%) had TP53 wt EC (SEL, n = 77; placebo, n = 36). At data cut-off (April 1, 2024), PFS subgroup analyses generally showed benefit for SEL compared with placebo in the TP53 wt subgroup regardless of clinical factor (table). Adverse events (AEs) were generally manageable and reversible. The most common AEs (overall/Grade ≥3) with SEL were nausea (89.5%/13.2%), vomiting (60.5%/2.6%), and diarrhea (44.7%/3.9%). Dual anti-emetics were not mandated. No meaningful differences in AEs were observed across subgroups. 17.1% of pts discontinued SEL due to AEs; 1 death occurred in the placebo group. Conclusions: A strong PFS signal was observed in the TP53 wt subgroup across a range of key clinical factors at long-term follow-up. Efficacy and safety of SEL maintenance therapy were generally comparable across subgroups. A phase 3 trial is ongoing to further investigate SEL as maintenance therapy in pts with advanced/recurrent TP53 wt EC (ENGOT-EN20/GOG-3083/Xport-EC-042, NCT05611931). Clinical trial information: NCT03555422 . Placebo, e/n(N = 36) SEL, e/n(N = 77) PFS, HR vs placebo (95% CI) Response to prior therapy: PR 18/20 31/46 0.50 (0.27, 0.92) CR 9/16 7/31 0.24 (0.09, 0.67) Disease at time of prior therapy: Primary Advanced 12/17 18/34 0.58 (0.28, 1.21) Recurrent 15/18 18/41 0.29 (0.14, 0.61) ECOG: 0 16/22 20/43 0.24 (0.11, 0.53) 1 or 2 11/14 18/34 0.50 (0.20, 1.26) Histopathological subtype: Endometrioid 22/29 33/65 0.45 (0.25, 0.79) Non-endometroid 5/7 5/12 0.31 (0.07, 1.34) Duration of last systemic therapy: 12 to &lt;24 weeks 20/27 28/60 0.45 (0.25, 0.81) ≥24 weeks 7/9 10/17 0.66 (0.25, 1.74) CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; e/n, patients with events/(patients with events + patients censored); HR, hazard ratio; PR, partial response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.5608
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-hoc analysis evaluating selinexor maintenance therapy in patients with TP53 wt endometrial cancer: Progression-free survival by clinical factors in the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study.

Jalid Sehouli, Erika Hamilton, Ora Rosengarten, Iwona Podzielinski et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Post-hoc analysis evaluating selinexor maintenance therapy in patients with TP53 wt endometrial cancer: Progression-free survival by clinical factors in the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study.

Jalid Sehouli, Erika Hamilton, Ora Rosengarten, Iwona Podzielinski, Isabelle Cadron, Ignace Vergote, Klaudia Reginacova, Alice Bergamini, José Alejandro Pérez Fidalgo, Lucy Gilbert, Michael Teneriello, Vicky Makker, Giorgio Valabrega, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Alfred Guirguis, Toon Van Gorp, Dirk Bauerschlag, Pratheek Kalyanapu, Jerónimo Martínez-García, Eva Guerra
article en

Abstract

5608 Background: At primary analysis of the phase 3 study of selinexor (SEL) maintenance treatment in patients (pts) with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC), improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) for the intent-to-treat population was not clinically meaningful. However, a promising efficacy signal was seen in a pre-specified exploratory analysis of TP53 wt EC. We present further exploratory PFS analyses of long-term follow-up data in TP53 wt EC. Methods: ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO (NCT03555422) was a double-blind randomized (2:1) study evaluating SEL vs placebo as maintenance treatment in pts with advanced/recurrent EC following response to prior systemic therapy. Post-hoc exploratory subgroup analyses include response to prior systemic chemotherapy, disease at time of prior systemic therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, histopathological subtype at initial diagnosis, and duration of last systemic therapy. Additional subgroups will be reported at the time of presentation. Results: Of 263 pts in the study, 113 (43.0%) had TP53 wt EC (SEL, n = 77; placebo, n = 36). At data cut-off (April 1, 2024), PFS subgroup analyses generally showed benefit for SEL compared with placebo in the TP53 wt subgroup regardless of clinical factor (table). Adverse events (AEs) were generally manageable and reversible. The most common AEs (overall/Grade ≥3) with SEL were nausea (89.5%/13.2%), vomiting (60.5%/2.6%), and diarrhea (44.7%/3.9%). Dual anti-emetics were not mandated. No meaningful differences in AEs were observed across subgroups. 17.1% of pts discontinued SEL due to AEs; 1 death occurred in the placebo group. Conclusions: A strong PFS signal was observed in the TP53 wt subgroup across a range of key clinical factors at long-term follow-up. Efficacy and safety of SEL maintenance therapy were generally comparable across subgroups. A phase 3 trial is ongoing to further investigate SEL as maintenance therapy in pts with advanced/recurrent TP53 wt EC (ENGOT-EN20/GOG-3083/Xport-EC-042, NCT05611931). Clinical trial information: NCT03555422 . Placebo, e/n(N = 36) SEL, e/n(N = 77) PFS, HR vs placebo (95% CI) Response to prior therapy: PR 18/20 31/46 0.50 (0.27, 0.92) CR 9/16 7/31 0.24 (0.09, 0.67) Disease at time of prior therapy: Primary Advanced 12/17 18/34 0.58 (0.28, 1.21) Recurrent 15/18 18/41 0.29 (0.14, 0.61) ECOG: 0 16/22 20/43 0.24 (0.11, 0.53) 1 or 2 11/14 18/34 0.50 (0.20, 1.26) Histopathological subtype: Endometrioid 22/29 33/65 0.45 (0.25, 0.79) Non-endometroid 5/7 5/12 0.31 (0.07, 1.34) Duration of last systemic therapy: 12 to &lt;24 weeks 20/27 28/60 0.45 (0.25, 0.81) ≥24 weeks 7/9 10/17 0.66 (0.25, 1.74) CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; e/n, patients with events/(patients with events + patients censored); HR, hazard ratio; PR, partial response.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Gynecologic Oncology Group (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Texas Oncology (US), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES), Sarah Cannon (US), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), A. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino (IT), AZ Turnhout (BE), Parkview Health (US), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (ES), Karyopharm Therapeutics (United States) (US), University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady (CZ), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Lübeck (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
Karyopharm Therapeutics
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.