Response analysis for injected and non-injected lesions and of the safety and efficacy of superficial and deep/visceral RP1 injection in the registrational cohort of anti–PD-1–failed melanoma patients of the IGNYTE trial.

9537 Background: The IGNYTE trial (NCT03767348) primary analysis of RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) plusnivolumab (nivo) showed clinically meaningful durable efficacy (ORR, 32.9%; median DOR, 33.7 mos, by RECIST 1.1 and independent central review) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma, including deep responses in non-injected visceral lesions, demonstrating systemic efficacy. Here we present an analysis of efficacy in injected and non-injected lesions and safety and efficacy in pts receiving superficial and/or deep/visceral RP1 injections. Methods: Pts with confirmed progression during anti–PD-1 ± anti–CTLA-4 for ≥8 weeks were enrolled. RP1 (1×10 6 PFU/mL x1, then Q2W 1×10 7 PFU/mL x7, up to 10 mL) was injected into superficial and/or deep/visceral tumors using imaging guidance. Nivo was given (240 mg Q2W) from the 2 nd dose of RP1 through dose 8, then alone (240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W) for 2 yrs, with additional RP1 injections allowed if indicated. Results: For the 46 responding patients by RECIST 1.1 (of the 140 enrolled) 197 lesions were measured, 78 injected, 119 non-injected of which 98.7% and 96.6% had any reduction and 93.5% and 79.0% >30% reduction, respectively. For visceral lesions, 85.7% of injected and 96.2% of non-injected lesions had any reduction and 85.7% and 65.4% had >30% reduction, respectively. 104 patients had superficial only injections, and 36 had deep/visceral +/- superficial injections. Treatment-related adverse event (TRAEs) rates were comparable in patients who were injected superficially compared to patients who received deep/visceral injections, except for chills, influenza-like illness, and injection-site pain, which were numerically higher in the deep/visceral +/- superficial group. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 14.4% of pts by superficial injection and 8.3% by deep/visceral +/- superficial injection. Grade 1/2 pneumothorax occurred in 3/52 (5.8%) lung injections. No liver function abnormalities or significant bleeds were reported after liver injections. The ORR for pts with superficial injection only was 29.8%, and 41.7% for deep/visceral +/- superficial. Conclusions: Meaningful systemic responses were observed independent of the injection status of individual lesions or their anatomical site. Overall response was therefore driven by the response of both injected and non-injected lesions. The safety profile of deep/visceral injection was comparable to that of superficial injections, with efficacy also being similar. Clinical trial information: NCT03767348 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.9537
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response analysis for injected and non-injected lesions and of the safety and efficacy of superficial and deep/visceral RP1 injection in the registrational cohort of anti–PD-1–failed melanoma patients of the IGNYTE trial.

Gino K. In, Adel Samson, Célèste Lebbé, Dirk Schadendorf et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Response analysis for injected and non-injected lesions and of the safety and efficacy of superficial and deep/visceral RP1 injection in the registrational cohort of anti–PD-1–failed melanoma patients of the IGNYTE trial.

Gino K. In, Adel Samson, Célèste Lebbé, Dirk Schadendorf, Bartosz Chmielowski, Caroline Gaudy‐Marqueste, Jiaxin Niu, Georgia M. Beasley, Tawnya L. Bowles, Eva Muñoz‐Couselo, Trisha M. Wise‐Draper, Marcus Vinícius Canário Viana, Joseph J. Sacco, Katy K. Tsai, Mohammed Milhem, Caroline Robert, Michael K.K. Wong, Junhong Zhu, Jeannie W Hou
article en

Abstract

9537 Background: The IGNYTE trial (NCT03767348) primary analysis of RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) plusnivolumab (nivo) showed clinically meaningful durable efficacy (ORR, 32.9%; median DOR, 33.7 mos, by RECIST 1.1 and independent central review) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma, including deep responses in non-injected visceral lesions, demonstrating systemic efficacy. Here we present an analysis of efficacy in injected and non-injected lesions and safety and efficacy in pts receiving superficial and/or deep/visceral RP1 injections. Methods: Pts with confirmed progression during anti–PD-1 ± anti–CTLA-4 for ≥8 weeks were enrolled. RP1 (1×10 6 PFU/mL x1, then Q2W 1×10 7 PFU/mL x7, up to 10 mL) was injected into superficial and/or deep/visceral tumors using imaging guidance. Nivo was given (240 mg Q2W) from the 2 nd dose of RP1 through dose 8, then alone (240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W) for 2 yrs, with additional RP1 injections allowed if indicated. Results: For the 46 responding patients by RECIST 1.1 (of the 140 enrolled) 197 lesions were measured, 78 injected, 119 non-injected of which 98.7% and 96.6% had any reduction and 93.5% and 79.0% >30% reduction, respectively. For visceral lesions, 85.7% of injected and 96.2% of non-injected lesions had any reduction and 85.7% and 65.4% had >30% reduction, respectively. 104 patients had superficial only injections, and 36 had deep/visceral +/- superficial injections. Treatment-related adverse event (TRAEs) rates were comparable in patients who were injected superficially compared to patients who received deep/visceral injections, except for chills, influenza-like illness, and injection-site pain, which were numerically higher in the deep/visceral +/- superficial group. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 14.4% of pts by superficial injection and 8.3% by deep/visceral +/- superficial injection. Grade 1/2 pneumothorax occurred in 3/52 (5.8%) lung injections. No liver function abnormalities or significant bleeds were reported after liver injections. The ORR for pts with superficial injection only was 29.8%, and 41.7% for deep/visceral +/- superficial. Conclusions: Meaningful systemic responses were observed independent of the injection status of individual lesions or their anatomical site. Overall response was therefore driven by the response of both injected and non-injected lesions. The safety profile of deep/visceral injection was comparable to that of superficial injections, with efficacy also being similar. Clinical trial information: NCT03767348 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
University of Southern California (US), University of Iowa (US), Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Leeds (GB), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Liverpool (GB), Inserm (FR), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Université Paris Cité (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), St James's University Hospital (GB), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Intermountain Medical Center (US), Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Duke Medical Center (US), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (FR), UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.