Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a prevalent cardiovascular condition among elderly patients frequently treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Traditional hemodynamic monitoring during TAVI relies on invasive methods. The ClearSight<sup>®</sup> Finger Cuff system offers a non-invasive alternative for continuous hemodynamic monitoring. To compare the reliability and feasibility of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring with traditional invasive hemodynamic monitoring during TAVI procedures. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective observational study, patients undergoing elective TAVI were recruited from two tertiary hospitals between March and August 2023. Invasive hemodynamic measurements were obtained using arterial and pigtail catheters, with a subset undergoing right heart catheterization. Non-invasive measurements were captured using the ClearSight<sup>®</sup> system. Data on baseline characteristics, procedural details, and 30-day follow-up outcomes were collected. <b>Results:</b> The study cohort comprised 50 patients (median age 82 years (IQR 78.0, 85.8), 50% female). Non-invasive measurements of cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume (SV) were consistently lower than invasive measurements (CO: 4.1 vs. 4.8 L/min, <i>p</i> = 0.03; CI: 2.2 vs. 2.7 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.01, SV: 66 vs. 77 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.25). Non-invasive blood pressure readings were lower than invasive radial and aortic measurements before and after TAVI. Correlation of non- and invasive measurements was low but similar before and after TAVI (Mean percentage error of 52%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The ClearSight<sup>®</sup> system provided lower absolute values for all evaluated hemodynamic parameters as well as low correlation compared to traditional methods pre- as well as post-interventional.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113794
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Gregor Leibundgut, Thorald Stolte, Felix Mahfoud, Jakob Johannes Reichl et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Gregor Leibundgut, Thorald Stolte, Felix Mahfoud, Jakob Johannes Reichl, Thomas Nestelberger, Max Wagener, Jasper Boeddinghaus, David Wood, Janarthanan Sathananthan, Christoph Ado Kaiser, John Webb, Christian Schöpflin
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a prevalent cardiovascular condition among elderly patients frequently treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Traditional hemodynamic monitoring during TAVI relies on invasive methods. The ClearSight<sup>®</sup> Finger Cuff system offers a non-invasive alternative for continuous hemodynamic monitoring. To compare the reliability and feasibility of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring with traditional invasive hemodynamic monitoring during TAVI procedures. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective observational study, patients undergoing elective TAVI were recruited from two tertiary hospitals between March and August 2023. Invasive hemodynamic measurements were obtained using arterial and pigtail catheters, with a subset undergoing right heart catheterization. Non-invasive measurements were captured using the ClearSight<sup>®</sup> system. Data on baseline characteristics, procedural details, and 30-day follow-up outcomes were collected. <b>Results:</b> The study cohort comprised 50 patients (median age 82 years (IQR 78.0, 85.8), 50% female). Non-invasive measurements of cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume (SV) were consistently lower than invasive measurements (CO: 4.1 vs. 4.8 L/min, <i>p</i> = 0.03; CI: 2.2 vs. 2.7 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.01, SV: 66 vs. 77 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.25). Non-invasive blood pressure readings were lower than invasive radial and aortic measurements before and after TAVI. Correlation of non- and invasive measurements was low but similar before and after TAVI (Mean percentage error of 52%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The ClearSight<sup>®</sup> system provided lower absolute values for all evaluated hemodynamic parameters as well as low correlation compared to traditional methods pre- as well as post-interventional.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(11)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Basel (CH), St. Paul's Hospital (CA), University Hospital of Basel (CH), St. Paul's Hospital (CA)
National Science Foundation, Amgen, Edwards Lifesciences, Universität Basel, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, ReCor Medical, Universitätsspital Basel, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Universität des Saarlandes, Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung, Deutsche Herzstiftung, Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften, Medizinische Abteilung der Margarete und Walter Lichtenstein-Stiftung, Terumo, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie-Herz und Kreislaufforschung., Servier, Roche Diagnostics
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.