De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

e12612 Background: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard treatment for patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). While the ACOSOG Z0011 trial demonstrated that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone was non-inferior to ALND in patients with limited nodal disease undergoing upfront surgery, its safety and efficacy in NST settings remain unclear, particularly for clinically node-positive patients. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of de-escalating axillary surgery by comparing the oncologic outcomes of SLNB alone versus ALND in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes after NST. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with cT1-4N0-2M0 invasive breast cancer treated with NST (2015–2022) at Seoul National University Hospital. Patients had 1-2 tumor-positive sentinel nodes and underwent either SLNB alone or ALND after SLNB. Those with direct ALND without SLNB were excluded. Clinical and pathological characteristics, event-free survival (EFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. Results: Among 408 patients, 79 (19.3%) underwent SLNB alone, and 329 (80.7%) underwent ALND. The median age was 49.0 years, with a follow-up of 51.8 months. In the ALND group, 155 patients (47.1%) received lumpectomy, while in the SLNB alone group, 44 patients (55.7%) underwent lumpectomy. Postoperative radiation therapy was administered to 98.2% of patients. Clinical T stage and tumor subtype distributions were similar, but the ALND group had more clinical N2 patients (45.3% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.022). Pathologic N staging in the ALND group revealed pN1 in 83.3% and pN2 in 16.7%. There were no significant differences in EFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.18–1.17, p = 0.11), DMFS (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.15–1.20, p = 0.10), or OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.06–3.90, p = 0.50) in the SLNB alone group compared to the ALND group. Conclusions: SLNB alone, followed by appropriate adjuvant therapy, may be a feasible alternative to ALND in patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes after NST, reducing morbidity without compromising oncologic outcomes. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e12612
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Wonshik Han, Eunhye Kang, Jinyoung Byeon, Han‐Byoel Lee et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Wonshik Han, Eunhye Kang, Jinyoung Byeon, Han‐Byoel Lee, Ji-Jung Jung, Hong‐Kyu Kim, Hyeong‐Gon Moon
article en

Abstract

e12612 Background: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard treatment for patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). While the ACOSOG Z0011 trial demonstrated that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone was non-inferior to ALND in patients with limited nodal disease undergoing upfront surgery, its safety and efficacy in NST settings remain unclear, particularly for clinically node-positive patients. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of de-escalating axillary surgery by comparing the oncologic outcomes of SLNB alone versus ALND in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes after NST. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with cT1-4N0-2M0 invasive breast cancer treated with NST (2015–2022) at Seoul National University Hospital. Patients had 1-2 tumor-positive sentinel nodes and underwent either SLNB alone or ALND after SLNB. Those with direct ALND without SLNB were excluded. Clinical and pathological characteristics, event-free survival (EFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. Results: Among 408 patients, 79 (19.3%) underwent SLNB alone, and 329 (80.7%) underwent ALND. The median age was 49.0 years, with a follow-up of 51.8 months. In the ALND group, 155 patients (47.1%) received lumpectomy, while in the SLNB alone group, 44 patients (55.7%) underwent lumpectomy. Postoperative radiation therapy was administered to 98.2% of patients. Clinical T stage and tumor subtype distributions were similar, but the ALND group had more clinical N2 patients (45.3% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.022). Pathologic N staging in the ALND group revealed pN1 in 83.3% and pN2 in 16.7%. There were no significant differences in EFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.18–1.17, p = 0.11), DMFS (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.15–1.20, p = 0.10), or OS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.06–3.90, p = 0.50) in the SLNB alone group compared to the ALND group. Conclusions: SLNB alone, followed by appropriate adjuvant therapy, may be a feasible alternative to ALND in patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes after NST, reducing morbidity without compromising oncologic outcomes. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.