The future is participatory

The World Health Organisation develops and delivers a range of technical documents outlining best practice procedures with the aim of improving global health outcomes and with emphasis on supporting low- and middle-income countries. However, these guidelines and other normative standard setting products tend to have low uptake and implementation in the countries and communities they aim to reach due a range of system level barriers and decision-making processes. These barriers are compounded by a disconnect between the individuals who write and develop guidelines, typically in wealthy nations, and those who are expected to implement them at the country level, typically in middle- and low-income countries. In order to address this problem, we employ the Digital Tactile Tools co-design method as a means to understand the lived experience of implementing guidelines in country contexts. By drawing on participatory design, we show that alternative approaches to generating and testing, at scale, communication design processes is a viable and important means to developing more inclusive and responsive global health guidance. With this example we suggest that communication futures must consider the wider context and environmental factors in which information will be used and understood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visible Language
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34314/wn2vpn43
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The future is participatory

Leah Heiss, Troy McGee, Myra Thiessen, Gene Bawden et al.
Visible Language
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

The future is participatory

Leah Heiss, Troy McGee, Myra Thiessen, Gene Bawden, Kidist Bartolomeos
article en

Abstract

The World Health Organisation develops and delivers a range of technical documents outlining best practice procedures with the aim of improving global health outcomes and with emphasis on supporting low- and middle-income countries. However, these guidelines and other normative standard setting products tend to have low uptake and implementation in the countries and communities they aim to reach due a range of system level barriers and decision-making processes. These barriers are compounded by a disconnect between the individuals who write and develop guidelines, typically in wealthy nations, and those who are expected to implement them at the country level, typically in middle- and low-income countries. In order to address this problem, we employ the Digital Tactile Tools co-design method as a means to understand the lived experience of implementing guidelines in country contexts. By drawing on participatory design, we show that alternative approaches to generating and testing, at scale, communication design processes is a viable and important means to developing more inclusive and responsive global health guidance. With this example we suggest that communication futures must consider the wider context and environmental factors in which information will be used and understood.

Visible LanguageVol. 57(1)
World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The future is participatory — Leah Heiss, Troy McGee, et al. · Visible Language (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS