Adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study study.

e16152 Background : In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery (NICT+S) has shown good pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and prognosis. However, it is not known whether patients with ESCC who have received t also require adjuvant therapy. Methods: Data from 293 patients who received NICT+S between 2021 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. To compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), we produced Kaplan-Meier survival curves. To determine the parameters associated with disease-free survival and overall survival, Cox models were developed using hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Among 293 ESCC patients who received NICT+S, 258 cases were ultimately included in the research. The percentage of R0 resection was 99.6%. After NICT, 62 (24.0%) patients achieved pathological complete response. Adjuvant therapy (AT) was given to 193 (74.8%) patients following NICT+S, 145 (56.2%) patients received adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT), 48 (18.6%) patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without AT in terms of 2-year DFS (78.7% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.68) or 2-year OS (94.9% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.28). Similarly in the presence or absence of AIT (2-year DFS: 76.9% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.877; 2-year OS: 94.5% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.337) and ACRT( 2-year DFS: 84.7% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.321; 2-year OS: 95.8% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.256), there was no statistical difference in survival outcomes. Patients with ypT 0-1 (P < 0.001, HR:0.34), ypN- (P < 0.001, HR:3.31), with T downing stage (P = 0.006, HR:2.68), and without underlying disease (P = 0.0362, HR:1.91), achieved better DFS with AT. Conclusions: The presence of AT had no significant survival benefit for patients with NICT+S. Patients with ypT 0-1, ypN-, T downing stage, and no underlying disease may benefit from AT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e16152
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study study.

Yiming Mu, Jiandong Zhang, Yingying Zhang, Yan Zhang et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study study.

Yiming Mu, Jiandong Zhang, Yingying Zhang, Yan Zhang, Jian Xie, Ning Liang, Lili Qiao, Xinquan Liang, Xue Wu, Fangjie Chen, Pingping Hu, Fengxue Li, Guodong Deng, Fangjie Ding
article en

Abstract

e16152 Background : In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery (NICT+S) has shown good pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and prognosis. However, it is not known whether patients with ESCC who have received t also require adjuvant therapy. Methods: Data from 293 patients who received NICT+S between 2021 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. To compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), we produced Kaplan-Meier survival curves. To determine the parameters associated with disease-free survival and overall survival, Cox models were developed using hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Among 293 ESCC patients who received NICT+S, 258 cases were ultimately included in the research. The percentage of R0 resection was 99.6%. After NICT, 62 (24.0%) patients achieved pathological complete response. Adjuvant therapy (AT) was given to 193 (74.8%) patients following NICT+S, 145 (56.2%) patients received adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT), 48 (18.6%) patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without AT in terms of 2-year DFS (78.7% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.68) or 2-year OS (94.9% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.28). Similarly in the presence or absence of AIT (2-year DFS: 76.9% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.877; 2-year OS: 94.5% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.337) and ACRT( 2-year DFS: 84.7% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.321; 2-year OS: 95.8% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.256), there was no statistical difference in survival outcomes. Patients with ypT 0-1 (P < 0.001, HR:0.34), ypN- (P < 0.001, HR:3.31), with T downing stage (P = 0.006, HR:2.68), and without underlying disease (P = 0.0362, HR:1.91), achieved better DFS with AT. Conclusions: The presence of AT had no significant survival benefit for patients with NICT+S. Patients with ypT 0-1, ypN-, T downing stage, and no underlying disease may benefit from AT.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(16_suppl)
Shandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.