“You’ve got the door cracked enough that maybe they can’t quite get it closed again”: A qualitative study of trainers’ perceptions of the impacts of a two-day antiracism training

Diversity training is commonly used by organizations, but evidence of positive impacts is mixed. Antiracism training, which focuses on structural racism, is largely unexamined in the diversity training literature. The Racial Equity Institute (REI) offers a widely implemented antiracism training called Phase 1 which has never been formally evaluated. As a part of larger community-based participatory research partnership, the research team interviewed REI trainers to understand their perceptions of the impacts of the REI training. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews (n=15) with 58% of REI trainers who lead Phase 1 to understand their views on what participants gain from the workshop. We used thematic qualitative analysis to understand the changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors at the individual and organizational level that trainers hope to achieve, including the factors that influence the impact. The interviews revealed that REI trainers expected the training to change participants’ knowledge of and attitudes toward structural racism. Trainers anticipated specific but limited individual and collective behaviors to result from the training. The most important anticipated outcome was that participants learn to connect racial disparities to structural root causes. While the literature on diversity training suggests many possible individual, organization, and outcome-level impacts, REI trainers shared a more limited and consistent set of benefits for how individuals and organizations conceptualize and approach inequities. Investigating the perceptions of antiracism trainers about impacts is the first step in creating appropriate criteria for evaluating REI Phase 1 and building an evidence-base for antiracism training. • Documented the need for a typology of diversity trainings. • This typology should include expected impacts of each type of diversity training. • Antiracism trainers’ knowledge on impact of diversity training is undocumented • Expected impacts include knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and racial analysis. • Partnership with training organizations could address limitations of evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100571
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“You’ve got the door cracked enough that maybe they can’t quite get it closed again”: A qualitative study of trainers’ perceptions of the impacts of a two-day antiracism training

Dane Emmerling, Shelley Diane Golden, Derek M. Griffith, Bradley C. Love et al.
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

“You’ve got the door cracked enough that maybe they can’t quite get it closed again”: A qualitative study of trainers’ perceptions of the impacts of a two-day antiracism training

Dane Emmerling, Shelley Diane Golden, Derek M. Griffith, Bradley C. Love, Alex Lightfoot, Deena Hayes-Greene, Geni Eng
article en

Abstract

Diversity training is commonly used by organizations, but evidence of positive impacts is mixed. Antiracism training, which focuses on structural racism, is largely unexamined in the diversity training literature. The Racial Equity Institute (REI) offers a widely implemented antiracism training called Phase 1 which has never been formally evaluated. As a part of larger community-based participatory research partnership, the research team interviewed REI trainers to understand their perceptions of the impacts of the REI training. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews (n=15) with 58% of REI trainers who lead Phase 1 to understand their views on what participants gain from the workshop. We used thematic qualitative analysis to understand the changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors at the individual and organizational level that trainers hope to achieve, including the factors that influence the impact. The interviews revealed that REI trainers expected the training to change participants’ knowledge of and attitudes toward structural racism. Trainers anticipated specific but limited individual and collective behaviors to result from the training. The most important anticipated outcome was that participants learn to connect racial disparities to structural root causes. While the literature on diversity training suggests many possible individual, organization, and outcome-level impacts, REI trainers shared a more limited and consistent set of benefits for how individuals and organizations conceptualize and approach inequities. Investigating the perceptions of antiracism trainers about impacts is the first step in creating appropriate criteria for evaluating REI Phase 1 and building an evidence-base for antiracism training. • Documented the need for a typology of diversity trainings. • This typology should include expected impacts of each type of diversity training. • Antiracism trainers’ knowledge on impact of diversity training is undocumented • Expected impacts include knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and racial analysis. • Partnership with training organizations could address limitations of evidence.

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 8
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.